Obama Micro-Historian

Courtesy of Politico via NH Watchdog-apparently Mr. Obama is now blaming people for things that never happened in the past that he never even suggested.  In an interview with Politico, the president said: “I think it’s fair to say, if six months ago, before this spill had happened, I had gone up to Congress and … Read more

Another Obama Jobs Program

Obama has apparently banned deep water drilling in the Gulf. Well c’mon, what did you expect. Millions of barrels spewing into the water and oil went down in price? Who cares if thousands more people are now out of work. This is about the agenda damn it. Besides they are probably all a bunch of God fearing, gun clinging republicans anyway.

From Day One

The anti-terrorism strategy so far has been to bow and scrape, and admit faults, and hope nothing bad happens.  The product of that failed policy has been for our enemies to take advantage of us while continuing to hate us more than ever, with a jihadi gunman successfully killing at fort Hood while two Bombs that were … Read more

From Day One

"Let me be clear” may be giving way to “From Day one.”  “From Day One” is the new backstop in the absence of physical evidence.  "From day one," the Obama administration was working behind the scenes on a response to the BP oil rig explosion.  You’re damn right they were.

Day one began with the same meeting they have every time something happens; how can we blame Bush or Republicans, and if not them who?  No "national" response is possible until that narrative has been worked out, and a plan is in place to turn whatever it is into some political advantage, unless it fits an existing grievance narrative already in place like "racist!"   The Narrative seeps out, the media and the administration regurgitate it, add spin and stir. 

And if you look over the short list of possibilities, Fort Hood, The Panty Bomber, Bonus announcements, Voter intimidation case involving Black Panthers, Tea Party protesters, Illegal immigrants rioting, things said by republicans, things said by democrats, scandals involving democrats, body counts, comments about clean black men, the difference in response time and the actions taken—or not–reveal their actual priorities.  It’s not jobs or growth or cleaning up corruption or clean energy.  It’s all politics, power and payback, all the time.

AIG bonuses—the ink isn’t even dry and the entire left side of the congress along with the White house is barfing class warfare rhetoric from every media orifice they can find about how they need to reign in big "whatever," new legislation already in hand.  An al Qaida trained terrorist tries to blow up a plane and is thwarted by passengers….need a week before we can even comment.

Of course we know why they need more time.  We’ve seen what happens when they are forced to comment on something before the ritual three day minimum.  They put their collectivist feet in their collective mouths.  They really have no clue what they are doing, especially when someone else craps on America before they can and they have no narrative in place.

Read more

Your Renewable Future?

PSNH, New Hampshire’s largest supplier of electricitiy, is looking to adjust rates to compensate for lost revenue.  They lost the revenue because of decreased usage.  Usage has decreased because of the economy, but that presents us with a real world truth.  The implications of the liberal environmental movement do not match the facts. Enviro-weenies want you to reduce … Read more

No Lessons Learned

Representative Shea-Porter, when given a simple solution invariably chooses the more complex one because it does a better job of hiding the true costs and intentions of any given legislative endeavor.  Insurance reform is the fine example, but a more obvious choice is Cap and Trade.  A basic sin-tax on carbon, like those on tobacco, would … Read more

There Will Be No Drilling

  Mr. Obama tossed out a rhetorical bone to the pro-carbon energy crowd by granting indulgences to the oil industry.  He promised to take their money for mineral rights leases but this is a feint and should not be misconstrued as an admission of or desire to increase domestic oil production. First, he will not … Read more

Smart Meters courtesy of Big Bro’

In their 1975 album, “Wish You Were Here,” Pink Floyd sang of an all-knowing machine: “Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. Where have you been? It’s alright we know where you’ve been. You’ve been in the pipeline, filling in time…” More recently, the band Velvet Revolver (featuring Slash of Guns n Roses fame on … Read more

The Liberty Tree? Sorry. That’s not compliant.

Our friend Paul at PunSalad was the first to make us aware of government regulations contained within the Waxman/Markey cap and trade bill (that our Congresscritters didn’t bother to read) dictating rules fror planting a tree. That’s right… PLANTING A TREE! Writes Paul: [C]heck out Section 205, a Federal program to emit grants for tree-planting to … Read more

Cap and Trade ALERT: Call Your Senators NOW!

Get your U.S. Senators’ phone numbers or web contact forms by clicking here… Call them and leave a message!! Vote "NO" on Waxman/Markey Cap-and-Trade. This is the contact information for Jeanne Shaheen. She needs to hear from ALL of us- NOW! (202) 224-2841 Web Form: shaheen.senate.gov/contact/ Tell her that after finding out what this legislation will do to … Read more

Guinta slams Shea-Porter on her vote for new energy taxes on NH citizens

D’uh. In a statement released today, Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta rightfully slams Carol Shea Porter for her vote on the Cap and Trade energy tax bill: Once again standing with Speaker Pelosi, not NH Hampshire residents:Carol Shea-Porter Votes for the Job Killing Waxman-Markey National Energy Tax Shea-Porter Casts Critical Vote that could Cost Constituents Millions … Read more

On the Cap and Trade energy tax bill

This lady is quickly becoming one of our favorite members of the present US House… Minnesota Republican Representative Michele Bachmann on Waxman/Markey energy tax bill: "We know this will result in a reduced standard of living for Americans."  

Watch Cap & Trade TAX Debate LIVE. Boehner is ON A ROLL!

Rush hour in China. After Cap & Trade, they’ll be the ones driving the SUVs & selling their bicycles to us. Watch the US House debate live by clicking here. Watch C-Span even if you don’t have cable. Pretty cool. Too bad the subject has such a horrible possible outcome. Boehner: "All pain for the … Read more

NH Groups call on Shaheen to oppose Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade energy tax…

refinery.oil rig
oil derrick….money fistoil

Concord, NH- Yesterday, the leaders of several New Hampshire organizations signed a joint letter to Senator Jeanne Shaheen calling on her to oppose the Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade energy tax legislation. The letter was signed by the leaders of the NH Advantage Coalition, The Coalition of NH Taxpayers, NH 9-12 Project, Cornerstone Policy Research Action, Citizens Leadership NH, Granite State Patriots, and the Seacoast Citizens in Action. [GraniteGrok was among the signers as well]

The letter requests Senator Shaheen to exercise “yankee common sense” and oppose cap and trade energy taxes by urging NH House members Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes to reconsider their support for it. The leaders ask Senator Shaheen to oppose this legislation that “sets inflexible caps on carbon emissions that benefit green market speculators more than our economy” pointing out that this legislation will drive up consumer’s energy taxes. The letter also points out the lack of transparency and continuance of pork barrel politics in the bill.

Former State Senator George Lovejoy, the Honorary Chairman of NH Advantage Coalition stated “although the pristine environment of the granite state is part of our NH Advantage, hammering each household for an extra $1,600 in taxes is not.” He continued “the Waxman-Markey energy taxes threaten to extend and intensify the current recession by increasing costs for New Hampshire families to the tune of an extra $1,600 in taxes of which we don’t have.  From business owners to college grads with loans, people are already struggling”. The letter will be sent to Senator Shaheen office and calls on her to oppose the bill that enjoys support by NH House members Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes.

Here is the letter with signers:

Read more

Senator Jeanne Shaheen needs to take the lead in stopping Waxman-Markey ‘Cap and Trade’ Bill!

Guest Post by former State Senator George Lovejoy…

New Hampshire Senators sent to Washington have long been respected for their traditional common sense.  It is a long cherished value of the Granite State and on many issues New Hampshire Senators have taken the lead in getting colleagues from both parties to apply this ideal on very critical issues of importance to most Americans.

Such an issue is Congressional motivation to pass Waxman-Markey Climate Change ‘Cap and Trade’ Bill, a proposal now being discussed by the US House, as well as most Americans.  The need for Senator Jeanne Shaheen to step up to take the lead in defeating this consumer costly strategy could not be greater!  This proposal sounds good in the beltway but fails the people miserably as it will increase energy costs to consumers, cost jobs, while doling out free permits to selected industries (see last week’s Wall Street Journal article “Waxman-Markey Bill: It’s Giveaway Time for Emissions Permits”).  With this equation it sounds like everyone is adversely affected by Waxman-Markey; energy producers, consumers and taxpayers, job creators, and the goals set out by the President.  I might not be a fan of President Obama, but what sense does it make to have a policy that is this highly ineffective to every sector of the economy?

Don’t take my word for it – if you are not familiar with the job cuts concern we have, please look at over a half dozen proposed amendments from US Reps in California and Colorado to this bill that calls for an exit clause from this policy that “Suspends the Act should [certain number of jobs lost occur].  There is no doubt that Waxman-Markey will cost American jobs at a critical time with record number unemployment figures from New Hampshire to California.

We urge you to bring common sense to our House members in Washington and demonstrate the common sense approach Granite Staters have come to expect.

The authors of the Cap and Trade bill called Waxman-Markey is an effort to slow what they perceive as climate change with inflexible caps on carbon emission have lost sight on the effect it will have on our personal income or national economy.  It provides no way to protect American consumers.

 

Read more

Guest Post– An Open Letter to newly elected US Senator Jeanne Shaheen:

Senator Shaheen, As one of the coordinators of the recent tea party gathering in Manchester, I heard many comments about the price of gas and whether proposals in the president’s budget plan would cause fuel costs to increase.  I believe there is a good deal of concern among residents and small business owners in this … Read more

Letter to Senator Shaheen on Cap & Trade

I mailed this yesterday… May 1, 2009US Senator Jeanne Shaheen520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen: In a March 12th article published on my website www.GraniteGrok.com, there were many points I am sure you have missed by former State Representative Mike Biundo (R-Manchester) on domestic energy strategy.  In taking this opportunity … Read more

On government motors and alternative energy. Bloggers weigh in…

In this week’s National Journal poll, prominent political bloggers were asked about Obama’s handling of GM and Chrysler and the changes–if any– we might see as a result of the ongoing energy debate. Q: Do you support the Obama administration’s handling of General Motors and Chrysler? The answer choices were simply yes or no. As … Read more

Democrats: “anti-energy, anti-growth, and anti-jobs.”

From the NHGOP: CONCORD – Today, former New Hampshire Governor and Republican State Committee Chairman John H. Sununu released the following statement on the Merrimack Station Power Plant:  “No matter how hard the Democrats try to sound like they have a constructive energy policy, their actions prove they are anti-energy, anti-growth and anti-jobs. The repeated … Read more

“That’s the point. Jeanne Shaheen has been a consistent opponent of nuclear power and oil drilling, where there is oil, for 25 years before her latest poll led to her switch of positions.”

Seabrook.oil platform

         Seabrook Station, no thanks to Jeanne…              Offshore drilling? No way!

Jeanne Shaheen

I’ll git you my little pretties… hehehe!

refinery. Seabrook protest

                      Refineries? Nope!                              Assault on Seabrook. May 1, 1977

Back in the 80’s, former NH House Speaker Marshall Cobleigh spent many a Sunday morning debating future Governor Jeanne Shaheen on a number of issues. At the time, the battle over the Seabrook Station nuclear power raged on, with the sides plainly split along partisan lines. Republicans favored the facility and Democrats opposed it. As reported in this post earlier this week, The NHGOP has released several YouTube videos showing Shaheen and Cobleigh going at it over the issue. At the time of the original airing, according to GOP state party chair Fergus Cullen,

she was organizing the radical anti-nuclear community in support of former Portsmouth Mayor Paul McEachern’s 1988 gubernatorial campaign. Shaheen served as the campaign manager and senior advisor to Paul McEachern, an extreme nuclear opponent, in both his 1986 and 1988 bids for the corner office.

[Mr. Cobleigh appeared on our radio program this past Saturday. Click here to download the podcast.]

Today he held a press conference to discuss the matter in response to what the Shaheen camp has had to say about the 1987 video:

STATEMENT OF FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER MARSHALL COBLEIGH
 AND NEW HAMPSHIRE ENERGY CHIEF 1973 – 1978
DELIVERED AT PRESS CONFERENCE
 MONDAY SEPTEMBER 22 AT THE LOB, CONCORD NH

I called this press conference because I was appalled at my long-time television adversary Jeanne Shaheen’s blatent attempt to rewrite and completely distort her record regarding the use of nuclear power and to point out Shaheen’s factual record as a long-time opponent of nuclear power, as well as her failed record as a big-taxing, big-spending governor who left office with a huge budget deficit of $300 million.  Just exactly the type of person we don’t need representing NH in the US Senate.

First of all, I want to address her campaign’s claim that the tapes now on U-tube that I lent to the Republican party “were taken out of context, and these clips are over 20 years old.”

The facts are that the tapes are from 1987 …. 21 years ago.

That’s the point.  Jeanne Shaheen has been a consistent opponent of nuclear power and oil drilling, where there is oil, for 25 years before her latest poll led to her switch of positions.

It is also a fact that nothing is taken out of context.  That is exactly what she said on the show and exactly what I said.  I challenge Jeanne Shaheen to demonstrate clearly what she claims is taken out of context.  We were on the weekly show for about 10 years.  The facts are that Jeanne Shaheen constantly harped about her distaste for nuclear power.  I know it.  And she knows it. 

I just don’t have the rest of the tapes to prove it.

I also challenge Jeanne Shaheen to put up or shut up.  I am willing to let any member of the press examine these tapes and verify that nothing is taken out of context.

The Shaheen spokesman also claims “what Jeanne Shaheen has CONSISTENTLY SAID …. that nuclear power is a part of our energy mix…. but we should not subsidize it, and WE SHOULD NOT EXPAND IT  until we have a safe way to deal with the waste.”

That is typical Jeanne Shaheen, trying to have it both ways.  She gives the appearance of changing her life-long position and at the same time appeasing her clamshall friends with the qualifier
about nuclear waste. 

I also challenge Jeanne Shaheen to provide to the press any documentation showing that she has “CONSISTENTLY SAID over the years that nuclear power should be a part of our energy mix.”

Most of you know that in the past 3 or 4 months Jeanne Shaheen has outlined a 6-point energy plan and 3 NH op-ed pieces THAT DO NOT MENTION her sudden feigned support for nuclear power.

The Shaheens are famous for political dirty tricks.  You will remember that Jeanne Shaheen’s husband Bill Shaheen was fired from Hillary Clinton’s campaign for his anything-goes campaign dirty tricks of raising the issue of Barack Obama’s drug use.

The facts are that Secretary of Energy James Schlessinger told the nation’s Energy Chiefs  20 years ago, “There are at least 20 ways to solve the nuclear waste for 20,000 years but the politicians won’t make the choice of which way to use.”  France, which gets 80% of its electricity from nuclear power, chose to recycle and reuse nuclear waste but the Democrat-controlled congress put a ban on that technique just as they also banned off-shore oil drilling beyond the Gulf of Mexico.  Today we store nuclear waste at Seabrook Station because the Democrat-controlled congress lacks the courage to choose which of the 20 safe ways to use.

The most astounding statement Jeanne Shaheen made on the few tapes I have, came after I said,

“…. and if we don’t have nuclear power in this country we are going to become more and more vulnerable to the Arabs in the mid east, and that’s why WE ARE IN DANGER OF WAR, because we are not taking care of our energy dependence.” 

To which Shaheen responded,

“that argument just doesn’t wash.” 

Jeanne Shaheen was dead wrong.

The facts are that my 1987 comments were prescient.  We did end up in a mid-east war caused by Jeanne Shaheen, and her fellow NIMBY (not in my back yard) and NOPE (no
t on planet earth) fellow travelers, along with their Democrat allies in congress.  To have the unmitigated gall to blame the war entirely on President Bush and try to tie all Republican candidates to President Bush’s unpopularity caused by the war is the height of chutzpah.

 I believe that Jeanne Shaheen is making these blatently-false statements to hide from her atrocious record on energy, spending, and taxation.

 I enclose a documentation of Jeanne Shaheen’s sorry record on energy, taxes, and spending, which I shall not read so that we have time for any questions from you folks

These attachments [below] of Jeanne Shaheen’s record clearly show that Shaheen shifts positions more often than a windmill in a hurricane:

 

Read more

Share to...