GrokTALK! returns with a retrospective look at COVID-Era PCR Test fraud, then a leap forward: that test is still being used for things like Bird Flu in chickens, cows, and cattle, and it’s not meant for that either.
00:00 Introduction and Technical Difficulties
02:49 Tulsi Gabbard’s Revelations and COVID Lab Leak Theory
05:31 The Role of Media and Government in COVID Response
08:19 PCR Tests: Misleading Data and Government Control
10:43 The Impact of False Positives on Public Perception
13:38 The Broader Implications of PCR Testing in Agriculture
15:41 Scientific Misuse of PCR Testing and Public Health
18:17 Challenging the Narrative: The Importance of Inquiry
20:23 Conclusion and Call to Action
“Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire.” – Gustav Mahler
Watch on the ‘Grok Rumble Channel if the Embedded Video does not load.
Authors’ and Speakers’ opinions are their own and may not represent those of Grok Media, LLC, GraniteGrok.com, its sponsors, readers, authors, or advertisers.
Link(s):
- https://granitegrok.com/new-england/nh/2026/06/coming-july-1st-the-granitegrok-bare-minimum-books-collaboration
- https://granitegrokcom.creator-spring.com/listing/limited-edition-commorative-mu
- https://eve-healthcare.com/health-blog/bird-flu-pcr/
- https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-12-screenings-that-manufacture
ad
Edited transcript:
Welcome to another edition of Grok Talk brought to you by GranitGrok dot com and Grok Media L L C. Apologies for the two-week hiatus. Of course, one week I just took off, and the other one was unintentional. Turns out somebody turned off one of our firewalls, and somebody hacked us.
It wasn’t a serious hack. The website was back up pretty quickly, but nobody could get in to do anything. So all the scheduled content sat there, not posting, for about 36 hours. And then we had it fixed. Our dev people got it up and running again. We got back in, and everything got back to normal. But by the time that happened, it was too late for me to do anything about Grok Talk last week. This week we’re talking about, well, it’s an interesting subject.
Tulsi Gabbard dropped her Fauci IC community carpet bomb, five-inch binder, sixteen hundred pages redacted, but
Lots of stuff in there that was, I don’t know, unflattering about the possibility of a lab leak as not being some kind of tin foil hat conspiracy, which of course is what they made it out to be right away when people initially said, Hey, you know, this looks like it came from this lab where they were doing this research that would create this very thing that is now running rampant across every continent on the face of the earth.
Fauci, of course, had a fiscal and professional interest in hiding it, and he clearly influenced the intelligence community to hide the truth, not just hide the truth, but to sell a message that it was crazy tin foil hat conspiracy theories. We now know that’s not true. Of course, this is a problem that has plagued the entire response to COVID. And we can say happily, unlike most media, almost all media in our state and our region, and even in the country, and we are joined by a handful of websites just like us, regular news agencies that do actual reporting, who were on our side with this. They said, you know, there are questions, there are things that are suspicious, they don’t look right.
I mean, our first post suggesting that this was all bullshit came out less than a week after New Hampshire went into lockdown in March of 2020. And we were suspicious from that point on, and the data that the state was putting out proved we were right. Nobody reported it that way. And we would like to thank everybody who took the difficult path, who asked the tough questions, and paid the price. Big tech did a lot of damage to many websites, especially mine.
And we’ve been rebuilding ever since. So now we have this new stack of documents, this new bit of information that’s s saying, Well, look, here’s just another thing that you were beaten up over for no reason. In fact, you were right. So never forget, it can’t just apply to 9-11 and not just because the response to COVID killed a lot more people than 9-11, interestingly enough. Domestic terrorism, if you want to call it that, was far more devastating to the population.
So one of the problems, of course, is these industrial complexes, which really are oligarchies, which is amusing because you’ve got Bernie and Sandy flying around. That should be like a fifties beach blanket bingo thing. Bernie and Sandy. Anyway, the deep state that Democrats love, the industrial complexes are oligarchies. So when they say they fight the oligarchy, they’re full of shit. It’s all projection.
This thing from Gabbard gives us an opportunity to open some of those old wounds and take a look ⁓ at the response, different parts of it. We’ve written a few articles about it, and to point out again that the media, of course, isn’t covering this, and they didn’t cover any of the truth when they had the opportunity, and they certainly haven’t apologized for that. And so we’re gonna keep pointing that out too because obviously people spend their time on these platforms reading newspapers, watching the local ⁓ media affiliate.
And this isn’t true just here in New Hampshire. It’s true all over New England, all over America, and all over the world. They’re ⁓ they’re all lying to you, and they’re fear-mongering you. And we have another recent example that ties to today’s topic, which is PCR tests. Now, we were covering them early on as suspicious and then clearly unable to do the job they were asked, and the results were misleading and deceptive. Outright lies, but they fed the fear mongering, and that was the point. The despots, the petty tyrants on both sides of the aisle, used the results, along with their own local public health industrial complex, to create a situation where they had maximum control and limited freedom. And so that’s a problem. This is America.
And as I was thinking about all of that, somebody sent me a link to a post called The 12 Screenings that manufacture the patients they claim to find. I will link that. I’m gonna cite a lot of different content in the next 20 minutes or so. And I’m not gonna link to all of it, but you can use those titles to search granitrGrok.com for that stuff. So I don’t think I need to do that. I am going to link to this. You should read it. It’s not anything that will surprise people who had their eyes opened by the whole response to COVID, but it might, you might be like, wow, it’s a lot worse than I thought it was. But ⁓ in every case, go do some research.
If you find something in there, or something we’ve said or published, we encourage you to do your own research. Don’t just look at the links we send you, either. It is very important for you to have a full picture. And of course, if it has anything to do with your health, that’s your situation and your business. You make those decisions yourself. The internet is wide open. There are tons of details out there. Don’t make a decision based on something we tell you, okay? Sort of a disclaimer.
Little bit to unpack, a lot to unpack. I don’t know. We’re gonna get to that in a second. First
It is America’s 250th birthday and GraniteGrok’s 20th birthday. And to commemorate that, we have, I don’t know how, all the focus is gonna be. Mugs. Commemorative mugs. You can buy them online. Limited edition. I don’t know how limited, it depends on how many we sell. It may only be fifty or a hundred, or it could be a thousand. What if it’s only like ten? That someday they might be worth nothing.
Or they might be worth something, you never know. Anyway, you can do that. We get a couple of bucks from every transaction, and you get a mug, which maybe you don’t need a mug. Put some pencils in it if you’re not gonna use it for coffee.
Also.
Coming July 1st, the GraniteGrok Bare Minimum Books Collaboration is on tap. We’ve been teasing this for a few weeks. Starting July 1st, for every $50 to GranitRock.com that you donate, supporters can choose one PDF edition from the entire Bare Minimum Books collection by Ian Underwood. In other words, if you give us $100, you can pick two. If you give us $200, you can pick four. If you give us $950 or more, we will send you all 19 editions as PDFs so that you can search.
Share them and enjoy them. That’s coming up in July. support independent thinkers, get independent thinking. All right, so the PCR thing. GraniteGrok has the benefit of being suspicious about government. Of course, we were rewarded.
by the Southern Poverty Law Center as anti-government, which of course is absurd. We believe in limited government, not no government. In fact, we oppose no government. So anti-government, well, who’s government really? I would say the one that’s growing and expanding is one we oppose. And the one that’s shrinking, costing us less, and lowering taxes would be the one we would be encouraged to support as long as that behavior continued. The one that restricts your rights, locks you down, tells you you have to wear a mask, insists that you get some kind of chemical injection that turned out to be poison that doesn’t do the job it said.
That’s government. Kind of in a nutshell.
So we had, let me find it. I got a lot of things open here. Early on, the PCR test. The PCR test was the alleged gold standard for identifying whether or not you might have the COVID-19 infection. Of course, a lot of people were like, well, geez, it wasn’t ever designed for that. It’s not supposed to do that. It’s really easy to screw it up. And then so what? They just kept using it anyway.
July 20th, 2020, Granitegrok.com More than 50% of a recent batch of COVID-19 tests in southern Vermont produced false positives. As you will likely have learned by now, it was probably more like 100%. September 20th, 2020. Dancing to the tune of a test that could be wrong ninety percent of the time. Turns out it could be wrong 100% of the time. Who knew? Well, we learned as we went, didn’t we?
January twenty twenty-one. World Health Organization – a positive PCR test does not mean you have COVID-19. Yeah, we’d figured that out, but it was nice to see the headline. How many places did you see that reported in the regular media? That would probably be zero.
February 2021, excessive cycle times and PCR tests led to an untold number of false positive COVID cases in New Hampshire. So that’s, of course, another problem with the PCR test. And we’re going to read something from that article I cited in the introduction that’s going to make you go, ⁓ yeah, I think I knew that. And then we’re going to add a little bit more to it. May 2021. CDC just changed the testing rules to make positive COVID cases go away.
It reduced cycle counts from thirty-five to twenty-eight. It didn’t make false positives go away. It just reduced the number a little bit.
July twenty-seventh, twenty twenty one. CDC, no more PCR tests. They’d like tests that differentiate between COVID and the flu. It’s a nice headline in a story, but that’s not really how it worked out. They continue to use it, and it continues to be used today. And we’re gonna talk about that in a minute.
August 2021, FDA issues massive recall of PCR tests. Well, that sounded promising. Sadly, it was the opposite of what you would think. Quote,
Quidel were calling the Lyra SARS CoV2 assay M120 due to a significant risk of false negative results. November 17, 2021. False positive results from unreliable PCR tests are being used to manufacture a second wave based on new cases. They’re all related, aren’t they?
December 27th, 2021. Home COVID test kits, another bad idea as symptomless positives overwhelm ERs. So the entire time, the false positives had been the result of people who took a test they didn’t need to take because they didn’t have any symptoms, but they had been terrified by the politicians and the politics and the media into testing and testing and testing. Somebody made a lot of money on PCR tests. Your tax dollars were spent, probably billions of dollars, on tests that gave false positives, ensuring there was an umbrella of fear, and this reinforced the unconstitutional mandates that were being handed out by our tyrants and petty despots.
March twenty twenty-three, I jump ahead. There’s no link, just go to granitegrok.com and search for “PCR test” or “COVID”. You will get thousands of stories, lots of facts, and more truth than you will find anywhere else in our local media, certainly, and all over New England. Irony alert: Feds allege fraud over false COVID test results. I shared this one in particular because
False COVID test results were pretty much all we ever got. And a lot of those results were, of course, as you know, just regular flu, because PCR tests can’t tell the difference between anything and anything else. And of course, they can find anything even when it doesn’t exist. More on that in a few minutes.
An Illinois man has been indicted for allegedly cheating the US government out of millions of dollars for his pop-up COVID testing company and allegedly lied about test results.
Between February twenty-one and February 22, Alvy and others at his company allegedly devised a plan to seek reimbursement for tests under the government’s Health Resources and Services Administration, which covered the cost of COVID-19 testing for those without health insurance. These tests were either never performed, performed in such a way that the results were unreliable, or had already been paid for by patients, according to the indictment. They were
You couldn’t perform it right. There was no reliable result. Here is the best part of that report. It is absolutely reprehensible that the defendant would use a public health crisis to allegedly defraud taxpayers and further put public health at risk by providing fraudulent COVID-19 test results. This is from the Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul. Talk about defining the entire experience. Use a public health crisis to allegedly defraud taxpayers. There was no allegedly about it. The entire thing defrauded taxpayers. A PCR test is garbage.
And one of the things you need to know about the problem with the PCR test is that before I read for you the devastating indictment from the link that I mentioned. Bird flu, remember that? That became real popular during the Biden administration. They were really fear-mongering the crap out of bird flu. In fact, they used it to kill millions and millions of chickens. And that drove up the price of chicken and eggs. They went way up in price because they were killing the birds.
For no reason. Why were they killing the birds for no reason? Well, it’s important because this has translated into the bird flu discussion regarding meat and dairy. And they’re using PCR tests to test those birds and to test those cows and to test that meat.
The bird flu PCR test is a molecular diagnostic method used to detect the presence of the avian influenza virus in a patient. That’s the story. They are basically using the same flawed test to convince you that there’s this virus spreading in not just people who are.
Not symptomatic, but chickens and cows. Beef cattle. And you have to ask why. Well, they don’t want you eating beef. They certainly didn’t want you eating eggs. They don’t want you eating anything good for you. They want you to eat bugs. That seems to be what it is.
So from unbekoming, group D tests that measure nothing real PCR Kary Mullins won the nineteen ninety three Nobel Peace Prize in Chemistry for inventing the polymerase chain reaction. He spent much of the remainder of his career warning that PCR should not be used for diagnostic purposes.
PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something, Mullins said in 1997, it doesn’t tell you that you were sick or that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that. In another formulation, with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. This is from the Nobel Prize-winning chemist who invented the process. PCR doubles the targeted nucleotide sequence with each cycle. After twenty cycles, a millionfold amplification after thirty cycles a billion fold. At forty cycles, a trillion fold.
The MIQE guidelines, the internationally recognized standard for PCR methodology, state that CQ values higher than forty are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported. Harvard epidemiologist Michael Mina, quoted in the New York Times in August 2020, said he would set the threshold at thirty or less. The Corman-Drosten Protocol, which became the basis for COVID-19 testing worldwide, used 45.
The 2006 Dartmouth Hitchcock incident demonstrated the mechanism in miniature. Hospital staff developed a persistent cough. A rapid molecular test was developed. 142 staff members tested positive for pertussis. Nearly a thousand were taken off work. Thousands received antibiotics. Three thousand five hundred and ninety-nine doses of pertussis vaccine was administered. By year’s end, the established gold-standard culture result was returned. Not a single case of pertussis was confirmed. The outbreak had been manufactured by the test. In May 2020,
Tanzania’s president, John Magufuli, submitted samples from a papaya, a quail, and a goat to the National Laboratory under false names. The papaya and the goat tested positive for COVID-19. The 27 different PCR test manufacturers examined in Dutch court proceedings all carried the same product disclaimer, research use only, not for diagnostic purposes.
The WHO’s August twenty twenty case definition completed the circle. A person with laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 infection, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms, a person with no symptoms was a confirmed case of disease on the basis of a biochemical reaction in a laboratory. Almost all, we can assume, of the data in these state dashboards was bullshit.
Now, we were reporting that even with the results that were positive, The level of the pandemic as advertised did not match the data.
It was all an illusion.
So the whole thing was just nonsense. People got sick, people died, but nobody needed to quarantine except people who were actually ill, which is something you would do anyway. We didn’t need to lock down.
We didn’t need to remote learn. We did not need the COVID vaccine, which, of course, we’ve reported separately, was more dangerous than good, was not safe or effective, and continues to cause people harms five years later, probably for the rest of their life. So I bring all that up because once again, they are using this test. It is still in use. It is still a popular thing. Let me give you an example.
If you search your local media, knock yourself out, you’re gonna find all kinds of stories that are really happy and positive about the response to COVID, including the PCR test. One local newspaper here, the union leader, shared a Washington Post story about how the Biden administration had rebooted the government’s free PCR test program.
We also had a story in February twenty twenty-six in the Union Leader titled New Hampshire Medical PCR tests soared during COVID, and their uses are expanding. PCR testing soared during the pandemic is the go-to drive-thru quick turnaround way to discover if you had COVID. The story goes on to talk about how it’s being used in other applications, for which it is also, they don’t say this, not applicable.
I couldn’t find any stories questioning efficacy, accuracy, or evidence in any of our local media. Your homework assignment, if you choose to accept it, is to go to your local media websites and see if you can find anything about PCR tests that’s truthful or questioning, even. I don’t think you will. Please let us know if you do. But of course, the reason I bring this all up is because they’re using it as I mentioned earlier on chickens and now dairy cows. This is that bird flu fear-mongering thing that happened during the Biden administration, and they’re still working the story.
Quote, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Friday that the preliminary results of gold standard PCR tests show pasteurization killed the bird flu virus in milk. U.S. Department of Agriculture will analyze retail ground beef samples with PCR tests that indicate whether any viral particles are present and conduct two other safety studies. According to a statement, some dairy cows are processed into ground beef when they grow old.
The entire thing, just like COVID, is a scam. Now, I’m not saying they don’t have bird flu, and I’m not saying that that might not be a risk. I don’t know enough about it. I know that animal-to-human transmission is possible but rare, and usually only occurs in people who actually work directly with the animals.
Physical debilitation or death are even more rare, very rare. So here’s the question. This clearly adds a lot of cost, this testing. The level of testing that they could ultimately request could be significant and damaging.
Because the PCR test is useless for this. The creator of the test has made it clear. You can’t use it in these applications. That’s not what it’s for.
And I’m sure it’s gonna keep popping up. But it was made clear, I think, in the reporting that we did, that this is not an appropriate tool. And when you see it, when you hear about it, your job is to go out there and challenge it. Find resources, they don’t have to be ours, and say, look. ⁓ just select the link that I shared. This thing can’t tell you what they say it does.
You are being lied to. And then the bigger question: why? Who gains? What advantage? Politically, economically, whatever. Your job is to challenge these things because we can’t be in your town or your county or your state. You have to do that work.
You have to ask those questions. You can share your results with us, and if we have the time and the interest, we will gladly amplify them for you. But everything that happens happens locally. It starts with you guys. You have to go out and do the work. We’re happy to help when we can.
It’s certainly one of the things that we do. It’s why we’re here. But ultimately, if you don’t challenge the media, who covers it up? If you don’t challenge the politicians who believe it, and ask good questions as a reminder. Be polite.
Be decent. Just ask questions. And when they can’t answer them, say, I’ve looked into it. Here are my results. I think these have value. You are the ones responsible for protecting your freedom.
And that means every day, local level, town elections, state elections, federal elections, we are happy to share the information. We just hope that you pick it up and go off and do some research yourself and come to your own conclusions. If they happen to be ours, fantastic. If not, write am op-ed man. If you disagree with us, explain it. Our readers would like to know and they deserve to know. Because again,
I’m happy to bring it to you in whatever format you prefer so that everybody can consume it, go out and do some research, make some decisions,
Challenge ideas, theirs, ours. That’s what this is about. Independent media. It’s about the debate and the discussion. It’s about conversations that help us all arrive at a shared truth. And then being willing to let other people challenge it. So maybe you think the PCR test isn’t as bad as we’ve said. Maybe you think the PCR test actually had some benefits, that it could be useful.
That the person who won the Nobel Peace Prize for it misunderstands their own thing. It can happen. Scientists, of course, have to be open-minded. It’s up to them to be willing to allow others to challenge their conclusions. Otherwise, it’s not science. All right. Enough prattling for me. Don’t forget, commemorative mugs, click on the ad, go buy one, or just
Donate the money to GraniteGrok. And of course, the bare minimum books thing coming up in July, only for one month. Opportunity to help you support independent thinking. And your reward is to get some more of it. Thanks for watching. Hopefully, internet allowing, we’ll be back next week.
Get More Morning Update Here! – Or watch it where you hang out on Spotify, TikTok, Rumble, YouTube, Instagram/Reels, and Steve’s Substack.
Follow ‘Grok on X – Rumble – Facebook – YouTube – Signal – Telegram
WE ARE READER-FUNDED – PLEASE DONATE