Resolve to Cut Spending in the New Year

by
Rob Roper

Vermont voters screamed that affordability is the number one issue we want the legislature to address in 2025. While lawmakers have little control over what we pay for eggs and hamburger, what they do have control over – total control over at the state level — is what we pay in taxes, fees, and regulatory costs. These are the costs they can – and must — cut.

Since 2019, the year before Covid, the state budget has grown from about $5.8 billion to $8.5 billion. That’s a $2.7 billion – or a nearly 50 percent!! – spending increase in just four years. That’s insane. So, don’t trot out the line that there’s no room to cut or, as House Ways and Means Committee chair, Emilee Kornheiser (D-Brattleboro) ludicrously declared, “Everything in the General Fund is underfunded.” Bull…oney.

No politician likes to cut spending, but here are just a few ideas for what should be easy places to start….

Repeal Act 18, the Clean Heat Standard. While politicians on both sides of the aisle are at least paying lip service to the obvious facts that program is unaffordable, logistically unworkable and politically toxic, a mere vote (or “pocket veto” of no vote) to not move forward with PUC rules implementing the program would still leave in place in perpetuity the bureaucracy Act 18 created to set up administer this program. With no program we do not need this bureaucracy, which costs taxpayers about $1.7 million. Cut it by repealing Act 18 entirely.

Eliminate the Office of Racial Equity. Not just because DEI has been largely debunked as a concept, leading to more racial friction than harmony among its many other problems (although that should be reason enough), but primarily because Vermont’s Office of Racial Equity doesn’t do anything. I mean ANYTHING. Last summer I wrote a piece titled Whither Goes the Office of Racial Equity exploring the fact that its director, Xusana Davis, has been MIA since 2023. The Office hasn’t posted any meetings, issued any press releases since then. This is still the case today. Yet Vermont taxpayers are forking over more than a half a million dollars a year in salaries each year to prop up this at best worthless and at worst harmful department. Get rid of it.

Eliminate the Vermont Climate Council. It’s now redundant and has always been a joke. Created under the Global Warming Solutions Act, this twenty-three-member, unelected body was supposed to come up with a plan for meeting the greenhouse gas reduction mandates of that law, and then adjust it as time goes by. They never really did this. Their original “plan” was nothing more than a spaghetti splatter on the wall of hundreds of policy suggestions with no priorities set, no cost estimates provided, no implementation schedule recommended…. In other words, not a plan.

But, while all of this mental masturbatory activity has produced exactly nothing of value, Vermont taxpayers are paying millions in per-diem payments to the “volunteer” council and subcommittee members and for ancillary services such as meeting facilitators and expert consultants. Moreover, as we just passed the January 1, 2025, first GWSA target date, and after four years of “planning” not a single one of those hundreds of spaghetti strand recommendations to the legislature has been put into law. This reality, coupled with the major election losses Democrats suffered last November, illustrates there is no political or public appetite for this absurd climate change agenda. Ergo, we do not need a Climate Council spitting out non-plans no politician intends to ever execute.

There is also the fact that we now have seven full-time employees of the state administering the Climate Action Office doing essentially the same thing. I would argue we don’t need either of these entities, but we certainly don’t need both. So, while lawmakers are in there making adjustments to the Global Warming Solutions Act (you said you were gonna!), take a minute to erase the Climate Council.

Stop Subsidizing Planned Parenthood. Whether you are pro-life or pro-abortion rights, there is no reason for Vermont taxpayers who are struggling to make ends meet to be handing over money to a private organization that, according to its 2022-23 annual report, has nearly $2.1 billion in income and over $2.5 billion in net assets. Every other state in New England has gotten wise to this wealthfare con game and stopped tapping their taxpayers’ wallets to fill Planned Parenthood’s tip jar. Vermont is the only sucker left on this deal team, and so PP is asking us to not only continue giving them our money, but more of our money to make up for the sound financial decisions of all of our neighbors. Um, no. Planned Parenthood is perfectly capable of raising a few million dollars to toss on top of its other $2.5 billion pile from private fundraising. Let them do that and leave VT taxpayers alone.

Stop Subsidizing Private Electric Vehicle Purchases. If folks want to buy an electric vehicle, good for them. Have at it. Pursue happiness as you see fit. But don’t ask the state to put a gun to your neighbors’ heads and force us to help pay for your swanky new ride. It’s not the role of government to do this under any circumstances, let alone when the state and its citizens are in dire financial straits. Beyond that it’s cruelly regressive. How do you justify forcing a single mother driving a used 2013 minivan to get her kids to school and herself to work to subsidize a lawyer’s or a financial advisor’s decision to get a new Prius. You can’t. So, stop.

End the Mandatory Universal School Meals Program. You should have done this last year to help bring down property taxes, but you didn’t. $25 to $30 million per year is a significant chunk of change. It was a Covid emergency program. The emergency has passed. End the program. Low-income students are still served by the free and reduced lunch program; all this did was force the taxpayers to cover the cost of the rich kids’ meals. This is not a justifiable expenditure under our current financial circumstances. Admit you made a financial mistake in shifting the cost of a temporary federal program permanently onto the shoulders of state taxpayers and repeal the mandate.

’m sure there are lots more ideas out there along these lines, and we’ll need them! Departments that aren’t doing what they are supposed to, or anything at all; private non-profits receiving grants or subsidies that should be privately funded, not at taxpayer expense; programs that might in other more flush times be considered but not now that we’re stretched beyond our means that can be done away with given a little careful analysis. Share your ideas in the comments below!

Our little state simply cannot afford the $8.5 billion in spending that was voted for last year. That’s the reality this legislature was elected to solve. Your New Year’s resolution needs to be a state fiscal diet and exercise. Unfortunately there’s no such thing as budgetary Ozempic. You’ve got to do the work.

Author

  • Rob Roper

    Rob Roper is a freelance writer covering the politics and policy of the Vermont State House. Rob has over twenty years of experience with Vermont politics, serving as president of the Ethan Allen Institute (2012-2022), as a past chairman of the Vermont Republican State Committee, True North Radio/Common Sense Radio on WDEV, as well as working on state statewide political campaigns and with grassroots policy organizations.

Share to...