Stanford Researchers wanted to know how the COVID-19 mRNA injections lead to myocarditis. This presumes some things that the medical establishment has been shy about admitting, and some that linger with the researchers and the reporting (link may be paywalled).
“As a cardiologist, we get asked all the time, ‘How exactly does [the vaccine cause myocarditis?]’” Dr. Joseph Wu, the study’s lead author and director of the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, told The Epoch Times. “We thought it was a very important scientific and clinical question to spend resources [on] and tackle.”
It would have been a bit more honest in my opinion if he’d said, as a Cardiologist who had to ask patients if they’d received a COVID vaccine and to recommend one if they had not (mine did it every visit, and I politely declined), how exactly does the vaccine cause myocarditis? Run-on grammatical tensions aside, at least they decided it was a) a real problem and b) that identifying any mechanism was a worthwhile medical pursuit (just in case there are young men with parents who still think they need one).
Follow ‘Grok on X – Get ‘Grok on Rumble – Follow ‘Grok on Facebook – YouTube – Signal – Telegram
How far we’ve come from name-calling if you dared to suggest the OCVID Jab was the cause (despite all those young male athletes dropping dead).
Answer.
When an mRNA vaccine is given, immune cells release a surge of cytokines called CXCL10 and IFN-gamma, which damage heart muscles and cause immune cells to enter the injury site.
…
When administering the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to human cells, the first immune cells to encounter the vaccine, called macrophages, release CXCL10 to recruit more immune cells to the area.
In the second phase, more specialized cells come to the area, releasing IFN-gamma in response, and it’s these two chemicals together that directly injure heart cells. This damage encourages more inflammatory cells to enter the heart, causing myocarditis.
The Sparks notes version: Yes, that mRNA vaccine can cause inflammation almost anywhere, which is bad, and myocarditis is but one of many ailments you were not warned about when they were lining to people to get shot. Sorry, the shot.
To quote Lord Farquaad, “Some of you may die, but it’s a sacrifice I am willing to make.”
There was more and then less.
“These two cytokines cause inflammation to the blood vessels. They could cause inflammation to the heart,” Wu said, adding that they can also cause inflammation in other areas like the muscles and joints, which may be why some people experience joint and muscle pains.
He said that myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccinations is rare and that the viral infection is of greater concern.
Not rare enough; it could have been much rarer.
Mice that were given genistein continued to release antiviral signals in their body when given the vaccine, which indicates that their immune system recognized the vaccine.
Genistein is anti-inflammatory and acts like estrogen inside the body. Since myocarditis primarily affects young men, Wu said that they thought estrogen, a female hormone, may be protective against myocarditis.
“But we can’t be giving estrogen to boys, right? So here we give genistein, which is a weak phytoestrogen—plant-based estrogen, very weak.”
Per the reporting, giving genistein—a natural plant compound from soybeans—prior to injection counteracted the inflammatory effect in mice (which, along with human cell testing, is how the researchers arrived at their conclusions, but that’s not why I included the quote). Dr. Wu should expect to get hate mail (male?) from the gender-bender division of the gaysatpo for saying you can’t be giving estrogen to boys. You can, against their will, and across state lines, with the parallel point that there was zero need to provide boys under 18 (or even men under the age of 25) the mRNA vaccines, which never seems to come up in the research or the reporting.
[But we saved millions of lives, says you, the lying liars of tests, and deaths, and safe, and effective.]
Just imagine, an entire demographic who needed neither the mRNA injection nor genistein prior to injection, assuming someone both knew and reported the risk of inflammation. We know they knew, and not just unspoken, but prefaced with a lie. They knew the spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles did not remain in the shoulder, and they knew of scores of potential side effects, including inflammation.
We knew long before the COVID-19 injection was “ready” that young men and boys had little to nothing to fear from the Chinese virus.
And yet here we are, asking if we can trust this research, and you all have yourselves to blame for that, and everything else that has followed.
You need to start owning it, admitting it, and being very clear about your complicity in pandering to the narrative and, in many cases, in prioritizing your paycheck over honesty, curiosity, true medical science, and your patients’ actual well-being.
I should add that not everyone bent over at the first sign of occupational risk, and that a few of them are now in charge of the National Public Health Industrial complex because we elected Donald Trump President.
