STEWARD: “If You’re Not Getting a Bailout…Chances Are, You’re Getting the Bill.”

Steward of Prosperity

 

Over the past week or so, I have been receiving emails from various friends and acquaintances making sure I got whatever the latest news happened to be from the new grassroots group STEWARD (Save The Economy Without Accumulationg Record Debt) , and reminding me about the May 21st Stimulus Debate the group will be hosting– led by Nashua businessman Fred Tausch. "Interesting," I thought. "The news of this fairly new group sure has gotten out quickly." And then I recalled the glossy mailer I got a short while back. I’ll bet my friends went to the website advertised and signed up. 

And then, this week, another one showed up in the mailbox. I’ll bet this one caught peoples’ eyes, because it sure caught mine, taking full advantage of the infamous Air Force One "photo op" during which the presidential plane buzzed New York City, unnanounced, at what would have been "treetop level" were there any. But, even worse for the Obama Administration than reminding folks of THAT, STEWARD points out that it is symbolic of the true problem at hand:

 

Air Force One over NYC

 

When Fred Tausch decided to create a movement to "fight reckless spending and massive deficits" and to "raise awareness of the problems with President Obama’s stimulus package" which has since become law, he wasn’t kidding. In addition to newpaper, radio, and a very respectable Internet presence, STEWARD is getting to the folks via the US Mail with these eye-catching, informative pieces.

What makes this story even more interesting is the fact that Fred Tausch– a citizen and concerned taxpayer from Nashua, NH– supported Barack Obama for President in 2008!

 

Read more

[Tea] Party on, dudes!

. Even though we’re more than a month past the April 15 Tea Party Day that saw events in every state in the Nation, there are signs that the sentiment of frustration with government expressed lives on. First of all, we know that smaller Tea Party actions, unaffiliated with any organized national-level groups, have popped up … Read more

Guest Post– An Open Letter to newly elected US Senator Jeanne Shaheen:

Senator Shaheen, As one of the coordinators of the recent tea party gathering in Manchester, I heard many comments about the price of gas and whether proposals in the president’s budget plan would cause fuel costs to increase.  I believe there is a good deal of concern among residents and small business owners in this … Read more

Saving America with Church, family, friends…

Growing up the oldest son of a Navy SEAL team instructor who served two tours of Viet Nam, I got a  unique perspective on toughness, family and patriotism. It was not an easy decision for me to move to NH from San Diego, but having spent 16 years in NH, I guess you can finally … Read more

Guinta’s message to our leaders: Stop Spending Our Money!

Given the recent news of his quest to unseat NH’s current 1st Congressional District Representative Carol Shea Porter, we figured readers would be interested in watching Manchester’s Mayor Frank Guinta as he spoke to the gathered Tea Party crowd in the Queen City April 15th. As you can see, his message was very well received … Read more

New ad asks Gov Lynch keep true to his word…

Today, CPR-Action in conjunction with the National Organization for Marriage launched the television ad, “Our Trust” aimed at  informing the viewer on where Governor Lynch has stood on the issue of same-sex ‘marriage’ throughout his tenure as Governor.  The ad shows a series of statements made by the Governor, including one from a debate in … Read more

Supreme Politics

by Ed Mosca Byron “Whizzer” White was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Kennedy in 1962.  By current standards, he would be considered a far-right conservative.  He dissented in both Miranda and Roe, calling the latter “an exercise in raw judicial power,” while he authored the majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick, which upheld … Read more

Alinksky’s Rules – Abridged

Most martial arts will stress one important point – use your opponent’s strength against them.  I did Tae Kwon Do for a number of years and learned that the surprise attack works well, when you have a "straight ahead" attacker use a more circular pattern.  Good puncher?  Switch to a lot more kicks and stay to the "outside".  Better kicker?  Do the opposite.  It all hinges on the pattern you can identify and know how to neutralize the advantage.  Always seem to work well (those many years and many pounds ago)..

Seems to work well in politics as well – have a plan for what is unfolding in front of you (or, if really caught by surprise, what’s going on behind you).  That, however, seems to have been the problem for conservatives lately – what IS that pattern, how do I know there IS a pattern, and if I even have an idea of what is going on, how to neutralize it.

We’ve all been hearing about Alinsky’s Rules for a while, and I finally found a really decent abridged version of them here (having not bought the book yet).  It is worthwhile reading and upon doing so, have found a number of them have been attempted to be used against Doug and I by various Progressive folks in the past ("…you’re not following your own FAQs by showing that lady…" – Rule #4 [it failed by the way – they hate being ignored. Better yet, they’re not used to having their enemies doubling back and going onto the offensive against them!]).

And I think that’s the key for conservatives lately – few have taken the time to read the Rules.  You should…and start using them yourselves!  After all, they’ve had much success with them – just think of it as political Akido – recognize the pattern, develop a plan ahead of time to neutralize the pattern, and execute the plan:

RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy
." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon." There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

Read more

Notable Quote: STEWARD whacks Buckley on Tea Party Comment…

Fred Tausch, the leader of the STEWARD of Prosperity grass roots movement– who happened to support Obama for president– took NH Democratic Party Chair Ray Buckley to task for his recent insults aimed at Tea Party attendees today while appearing on WGIR radio:     I just love this quote from Fred on how HE characterizes the Tea Partiers: … Read more

Pushing the Gay Agenda in NH: Blackmail, Big Bucks

gay men

Last week, in an exclusive story, Now!Hampshire.com revealed, to little surprise, that the out of state gay rights activist network applied the final pressure pushing the same-sex marriage vote over the top in the NH Senate.

Ray Buckley told Democratic state Senators during closed-door negotiations that the Democratic National Committee might revoke New Hampshire’s First-in-the-Nation primary status if they failed to legalize gay marriage, NowHampshire.com has learned.

The vote was 13-11 in favor of legalizing gay marriage. All but one Democratic Senator voted in favor.

According to Democratic State House sources, Buckley told undecided Democrats they had to support the gay marriage bill despite a legislative committee’s recommendation that they kill it because otherwise the DNC’s Rules Committee would punish the Granite State by revoking New Hampshire’s key primary slot.

The Rules Committee makes primary calendar recommendations to the entire DNC, which then votes to accept or reject the recommendations.

When some Senators objected that voting in favor of the legislation might jeopardize their reelection campaigns Buckley retorted that he would be able to deliver plenty of money to help them defend their seats.

Our sources tell NowHampshire.com that the Senators in attendance took Buckley’s remarks to mean he would be able to deliver out-of-state money from gay rights groups.

Buckley’s successful arm-twisting in the days and hours leading up to the final vote on Wednesday drew praise from the Human Rights Campaign, a prominent gay rights organization.

And now we have more evidence that the outside money is already here. HumanEvents.com posted a story Friday that discussed the ongoing battle over gay marriage in NH and provided more proof of what we have known for some time: that the money fueling the Democratic Party here in the Granite State is coming– at least in part– from wealthy out of state donors looking to advance the gay agenda. Writes the author A.W.R. Hawkins,

How are Democrats able to push their hyperliberal agenda in what otherwise appear to be conservative states such as Colorado and Iowa?  Who is behind the sudden rush of laws allowing same sex marriage?

According to Focus on the Family (FOTF), the answer is Tim Gill, a gay multi-millionaire in Denver who has dedicated his time and fortune to filling state legislature after state legislature with Democrats who support same sex marriage. His latest target is New Hampshire

Admitted by none other than Party Chair Buckley himself:

 

Read more

KKK in New Hampshire!?

UPDATE:  Skip here:  I have taken a screen capture of Ms. Larsen’s blogsite and posted a JPG of it AFTER the jump to this post.  You can also click here (just search on "klan") and see the original HTML page as well.

KKK, eh?  Thanks for the compliment, President Larsen.  After all, if Alinksy’s Rule 13 says to demonize anyone that opposes you; just call them a "hater" to win the argument!

============================================================

klansman

Senate President Sylvia Larson compares Pro-marriage Defenders to Ku Klux Klan legacy!

As first reported at Now!Hampshire.com, On Friday, May 1, Senate President Sylvia Larsen wrote in her blog on the official State Senate website, remarks about the passage of same-sex ‘marriage’ and the defeat of the so-called ‘transgender rights’ bill.  Senator Larsen, in comparing the ‘marriage equality’ rights of gays and lesbians to the segregated south in the 1960’s, then wrote the following comments inferring pro-traditional marriage advocates are carrying on the legacy of the Ku Klux Klan:

 “Passing a law does not end discrimination by itself. One has only to look at the legacy of the Ku Klux Klan to see that. It takes fair laws and changing public attitudes…”

Larsen then continues the analogy while drawing on examples from the recent defeat of the transgender “bathroom” bill.

In a statement to the press, Kevin Smith, Executive Director of CPR-Action, reacted to the comments,

“Senator Larson has just heightened the rhetoric on this issue to an intolerable level with her hideous and offensive comments inferring that the thousands of traditional marriage supporters in this state are equivalent to the Ku Klux Klan.  Further, it is the height of hypocrisy for Senator Larson to demonize those who opposed the transgender bill when the Senator herself voted against it!”

Smith added,

“I call on Senator Larson, as President of the Senate, to apologize to the thousands of New Hampshire citizens, who support traditional marriage, for her irresponsible and reckless analogy.”

Oh, and this isn’t the first time a NH Democrat has invoked the "those who oppose are like the KKK" mantra. Remember Manchester state representative Lily Mesa?  She ended up resigning. Should Ms. Larsen perhaps follow suit? At the very least, she needs to hear how outraged you are at her assertion. Call her at 271-2111 or email her at sylvia.larsen@leg.state.nh.us and demand she, at the very least, apologize. Then, for good measure, call Governor Lynch at 271-2121 and ask he renounce her comments.

Read more

Letter to Senator Shaheen on Cap & Trade

I mailed this yesterday… May 1, 2009US Senator Jeanne Shaheen520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen: In a March 12th article published on my website www.GraniteGrok.com, there were many points I am sure you have missed by former State Representative Mike Biundo (R-Manchester) on domestic energy strategy.  In taking this opportunity … Read more

The only way the economy will rebound

Inflation dangers ahead?

Washington keeps looking for quick and easy ways to get the economy back on its feet and return us back to the good old days. Some Americans think we can shop our way back to happiness. At least that’s what Washington would have us believe. As such, our national government is now spending like never before, forgetting that we are running up our collective credit cards to the limit and that the tab will ultimately have to be paid. But never mind they say, it feels good for now – and some would have us believe we need all this “stuff” are buying.

Between the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve, Washington has committed well over $12.8 Trillion in new spending. The Europeans warned President Obama during this last round of G20 meetings that this is a dangerous course to take. The head of the European Union, which is always worried about inflation, w arned that the spending of the U.S. Government is taking us down “the road to hell.”  The French and the Germans have made similar warnings and have pressed for a repair to the regulatory system. Unfortunately, the Democratic Administration has brushed past these requests. While acknowledging that their arguments have merit, the Democrats called for even more stimulus spending.

One of the dangers of all this historically unprecedented spending is that it will spark a very dangerous new round of inflation. Never mind the spenders argue, before inflation can get started, we will pull the money out of the system. This of course sounds very much like the drug user who says that he is not hooked and can quit anytime. Washington does not work that way and never has; real spending cuts have rarely been seen. A brief history of the size of government as a percent of GDP shows that government never shrinks. At best, it plateaus from time to time.

Were this a run of the mill recession, where there was a mere imbalance in asset supply and demand, government spending might do the trick. But this is a deeper financial sector crisis that will require major structural changes.  No amount of spending will fix the structural problems in the economy. We may very well pump up the economy into a short term sugar high. But there is an underlying illness that very much needs tending, lest we set ourselves up for a repeat of 2008. In some w ays, the experience of the crash of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) in 1998 was, in effect, a dress rehearsal for this crisis – from which we learned nothing.

First and foremost,…

Read more

Notable Quote[s]: Interview with Mark Levin

Most nights lately I’ve taken to listening to the talk radio program hosted "the Great One," Mark Levin, author of the important book sweeping the Nation: Liberty and Tyranny- A Conservative Manifesto. About halfway through, I can attest that I have not read anything quite like it with regards to his description of the ongoing … Read more

A commentary on “No government, no markets”

  "I can’t resist: without government, there would be no f*****g MARKET. What is it about contracts you don’t understand?"   -Michael Kitch   Skip asked me to comment on this ("Is Government NECESSARY for a marketplace to exist?"), as he knows that I am an economist. This is a very good but very complex question. … Read more

Welcome to the Gay State. It’s all up to…

What WILL he do? Now that the Democrat-controlled Senate has followed in their House comrades’ footsteps and passed gay marriage for New Hampshire, the hot potato lands in Gov. Do-Nuthin’s Lynch’s lap. The big question is whether he will remain true to his word and stop this garbage? The NHGOP Chair John H. Sununu puts … Read more

Sarah Palin blows opportunity to shine on national stage

Et tu, Sarah Barracuda? The Juneau Empire.com headline bore the news that pretty much capped an already sad political day for this Granite Stater: Palin to accept most stimulus funds, aide says Oh, great. The one bright spot for conservative Republicans joins the rest of the lemmings diving off the cliff of fiscal reality. Has … Read more

Washington’s Great Bait and Switch

Please note that Bob Bestani is now going to be a regular contributor to the ‘Grok – giving us a bit academic outlook than what Doug and I can.  We are thrilled to have him on board!

Washington’s Great Bait and Switch

In a period when the nation’s trust in government is at a low point, one would think that the new Administration and especially the Congress would at least make an effort at keeping their word. Sadly this was not to be in the largest and most important action they have taken to date – the economic stimulus package. They sold the stimulus package as one that was largely oriented towards the infrastructure and other important public works to rebuild the nation’s crumbling physical base. What emerged was anything but.

Analysts at the Engineering News-Record (ENR) have just finished sifting through the 1,000 page bill that was used to frame the $787 billion in stimulus package – something the House of Representatives neglected to do. What emerged from this careful analysis shows that the stimulus package just approved by the Congress contains merely 16.5% of spending for infrastructure projects.

For all the reasons listed in previous articles by this author, this action is bo th tragic and misguided. At a time when the country’s infrastructure is in need of roughly $2 trillion in new spending, $130 billion is merely a token effort that we will long regret.

Here is how it breaks down according to ENR:
 
TRANSPORTATION [$49.3 billion]

  • Highways: $27.5 billion
  • Transit: $8.4 billion
  • New discretionary grant program: $1.5 billio n for highways, transit, rail, seaports, other projects. U.S. Dept. of Transportation will choose which projects will be funded.
  • Airport Improvement Program construction grants: $1.1 billion
  • Rail: $9.3 billion, including $1.3 billion for Amtrak, $8 billion for high-speed rail
  • Port, transit, rail security: $300 million
  • DHS/Transportation Security Administration: $1 billion to procure, install airport explosives-detection, baggage-scanning equipment
  • Coast Guard, bridge alterations: $142 million
  • Coast Guard, ac quisition, construction, improvements: $98 million

DEFENSE/VETERANS [$7.8 billion]

  • VA: $1.25 billion for hospital and other medical facility construction and upgrades
  • DOD: $4.24 billion for "facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization," includes energy-efficiency improvements, plus repair and modernization of DOD buildings, including medical facilities.
  • DOD: $2.33 billion for facilities projects, including housing, hospitals, child-care centers, other military "quality-of-life" projects.

HOUSING/HUD [$9. 6 billion]

  • HUD Public Housing Capital Fund: $4 billion
  • HUD redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes: $2 billion
  • HUD energy retrofits, "green" projects in HUD-assisted housing projects: $250 million
  • HUD Community Development Block Grants (housing, services, infrastructure): $1 billion
  • HOME investment partnerships: $2.25 billion
  • Lead-paint abatement: $100 million

Read more

Tea Partiers defined

tea party

Most polite "unhinged mob" ever?

Earlier this week New Hampshire Democratic Party chair Ray Buckley characterized the people that attended Tea Parties here in the Granite State and across the country as an “unhinged mob” that “didn’t even know what they were protesting.”   Further, he opined that they appeared to “have lost their minds.” 

Perhaps if Mr. Buckley had spent time actually attending one of the several taking place statewide at different times, or if he got some of his news from someplace other than WMUR or the Concord Monitor, he would have known that the truth was in fact completely opposite from what he claimed—That those in attendance are in fact among the most informed folks around. You know the type, because it’s many of you, my dear readers. And me. Regular people too grounded in reality to get lost in the razzle-dazzle and hoopla that is the Obama Administration as glosses over the spread of poisonous, anti-American ethics and ideas up and down the political food chain. People like you and me that have stopped for a moment and pondered some of the consequences of what we are presently doing. We know you can’t borrow your way out of debt or blindly spend your way into prosperity. Indeed, most of the Tea Party participants are well aware that we are taxed enough already and that there can be a better way.

But of course, Chairman Buckley and his comrades know all this. That’s why they are so fearful of the Tea Party movement growing beyond its respectable numbers demonstrated on April 15th, tax day.  You see, in America, at all levels of government, the power always has– and still does– lie with the people when we exercise our right to vote. We ultimately choose who will govern and wield delegated powers. Sadly, with apathy spread far and wide, too many people, for whatever reasons, choose to opt out. This allows for the political class to more easily work and manipulate the process, often times ending with special interests carrying the day with agendas that run contrary to the beliefs and wishes of most people.

And so it is today here in New Hampshire where, rather than actually grabbing the proverbial bull by the horns and trying to deal with the present economic realities in a frugal, intelligent way, the Democratic majority, with the help of a few of the “usual suspect” Republicans, spends its time restructuring our state’s laws in accordance with the wishes of the very powerful gay network. As the state teeters towards a broad based sales or income tax, our “leaders” down in Concord are making Granite State bathrooms a potential safe refuge for perverts and deviants. While reports indicate our Live Free or Die state checks in with a higher percentage of seat belt usage than our cousins in the Bay State featuring a system of government-mandates and fines, our overlords have decided to sell any free choice in the matter for a few million dollars of federal monies borrowed from the communist Chinese.

This is not what people had hoped for when they voted for change in the last election. Buckley and the Democrats know this. And they know that the people at the Tea Parties know this. What they don’t want is any MORE people coming to realize that what has been happening is very wrong, and could actually destroy everything we cherish. Unfortunately for them, while they might be able to propagandize to a certain degree, thanks in no small part to a compliant mainstream news media, there is only so much they can do to hide the growing amounts of money they are taxing away from peoples’ paychecks. More and more, people are realizing that they are, to use the acronym “TEA”— Taxed Enough Already. 

And that, in a nutshell is what the Tea Party movement is all about:

 

Read more

Share to...