More on the meme – is the use of property taxes really charity? (earlier here and here). From the Laconia Citizen, 1/14: Rebuttal to Laura DiFonzo
By all means, all of the charities (which you call service organizations) you list do good work; no one on the Gilford Selectboard or Budget Committee have stated otherwise. What they have said, if I maybe so bold (as I am an elected Budget Committee member but do not speak for the Committee here), is that it is rightfully up to the citizens of Gilford to make that decision, via the ballot box, whether or not to use their tax money AND that of their neighbors’ to support them.
Personally, I am against the practice of sending tax monies and plan on voting no on these warrant articles. Why? I do not have the hubris to demand that my neighbor, or my fellow citizens in Gilford, to be forced to support any given charity no matter how good the intention even if I believe they should. At that point, it is no longer charity – it is forced giving. Charity is an act of individual kindness and responsibility; using tax monies is neither. Someone is declaring their disrespect for the property of others (i.e., their money) when they advocate someone else’s money should be used for a purpose that they might not otherwise support.
It should be up to the individuals of the town to make their own decisions whether or not to reach into their own wallets and no one else’s. Ms. DiFonzo asks the question of "what is a NH Citizen to do?" The answer is exactly what she is doing – as a United Way volunteer who works diligently to persuade individuals to be charitable and part with their money for her cause, she asks individuals as it should be.
Is she now advocating that people should no longer have a choice in how their money is to be spent? Does she believe that politicians should now be in charge of who receives charity – and who doesn’t? And by her Letter, is she signifying that all should be forced to give to those she supports?
In my estimation, these charities have lost their way and have become too professionalized as well as too dependent upon government monies. Perhaps, as the United Way does, they should return to the roots of charitable contributions – seeking funding from the actual public instead of from the individual town Public Treasuries.