The nuance of this “WILL” is more of a command versus describing a level of future emotions to come. Sustainable Communities Initiative – the Federal Government’s way (e.g. HUD, EPA, DOT) to federalize local zoning ordinances to result in their idea for a more “efficient” society (remember, Progressives are all about “efficient” societies – planned from the top down, it is their version of a Utopia that never mentions “Freedom” or Liberty”). Once again, my favorite pincushion Treehugger has a post on how to make cities “better”. All they have to do is to have “Smart People” design it for us using a set of new principles called “Transit Oriented Development” (TOD):
-
WALK | Develop neighborhoods that promote walking
-
CYCLE | Prioritize non-motorized transport networks
-
CONNECT | Create dense networks of streets and paths
-
TRANSIT | Locate development near high-quality public transport
-
MIX | Plan for mixed use
-
DENSIFY | Optimize density and transit capacity
-
COMPACT | Create regions with short commutes
-
SHIFT | Increase mobility by regulating parking and road use
Once again, I dryly note: not designed around the idea of “people”? Or are they merely chess pieces that have no minds, attributes, or needs of their own? Now the author, Lloyd Alter and I have had some tiffs in the past (probably why I’m still banned from commenting) and he certainly is one that believes that we MUST live with less and we MUST live “urbanely” (he certainly loves the urban setting and doesn’t understand why the rest of us don’t – and I lived in one of the most walkable cities in the Nation: Boston). He keeps sneering at those of us who believe there is a “conspiracy” around Agenda 21. Yet, in this post he certainly lets the cat out of the bag with part of this post (emphasis mine):
Read more