DEI is simply the sublimation of anti-white racism. Individuals are simply a factor of their skin color, and whatever other identity factors the Democrat Party decides are oppressed and need protecting. That fill-in-the-blank is too white, too male, too Christian, too heterosexual. The idea is to get people to view each other and themselves not as individuals but as members of a group, as the oppressed and the oppressors. Rather than creating “inclusion,” DEI spawns … as it is intended to spawn … division based on race, sex, etc., etc., etc..
Fortunately, other States are banning DEI. A couple of recent examples:
BREAKING: UNC's board of trustees has voted unanimously to abolish the university's DEI department and transfer all funds to the campus police. It's not 2020 anymore. "Defund DEI, refund the police" is the winning slogan of the day.
Good work, UNC trustees!
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) May 13, 2024
NEW: The University of Wyoming has banned mandatory DEI statements and closed its DEI office:
President Seidel: “We will not allow units of UW to require job candidates to submit statements regarding diversity, equity and inclusion. We will not have a requirement for employees… pic.twitter.com/jID2XZMUbg
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) May 13, 2024
So … ask yourself: why not New Hampshire? Why are New Hampshire public schools paying huge salaries to “DEI officers,” etc., in order to divide our children into warring camps, to indoctrinate them into seeing their peers not as individuals but as mere factors of their skin color, ancestry, sex, etc., etc., etc..
And ask yourself: why isn’t banning DEI as other States have done and are doing a priority for the NHGOP. Why is legalizing pot a priority but not banning a noxious concept such as DEI? Why is banning single-family zoning a priority but not banning DEI?