As promised in Monday Memes, I have an overflow. My meme cup runneth over. And yes there will be a Friday edition too.
Let the mayhem, mockery, and ridicule resume:
*** Warning, a few possibly off-color ones, in case tender eyes are about ***
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Reminds me of this:
Where are the DADS? More:
A group of middle school girls in West Virginia protested the fact that a biological male was allowed into their coemption.
In response, the board of education banned them from ever taking part in the competition again.
MHO of course. Board, tar, feathers. Some assembly required.
People DO NOT WANT to see the dark side of reality.
Many in my circles are exactly that.
No amnesty.
I’m still leery of Vivek in general, but that’s a great point!
Are Guns the Problem? – Walter E. Williams (walterewilliams.com)
I am very honored to have his picture, autographed to me, framed and on my wall at home. And, parenthetically, years ago I saw a correlation between the introduction of TVs widely in society and an uptick in violence. It wasn’t the programming per se; it was the mere fact of the “idiot box” in a majority of homes. And while correlation does not equal causation, the data looked compelling nonetheless.
A lot of people have no problem with panels 1-3; they somehow believe that being appointed or elected or hired into governmental jobs somehow erases human weaknesses. Same with having a MD or PhD after your name… suddenly they become transformed into beings made from finer, more noble clay.
Wow!
>>>>>=====<<<<<
PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA
I misplaced the text that goes with this, but basically it’s a chart of what percent of males & females loved their first intimate partner (not sure what language that is). Not only is it disturbing that the trend goes down… to the point where half the people are giving themselves physically to people they don’t love or that, at least in this latest data point instance, more women than men now don’t love their first partner, there are other implications:
Why Sexually Inexperienced Dating Couples Actually Go On to Have Stronger Marriages
Why, it’s almost as though Hashem’s wisdom of being chaste until marriage, and faithful within a marriage, works best. Hmmm. Related:
Understand this: There is a push for more and more casual sex hookups – the “hookup” culture – because the more partners you have, the less distinct each one becomes. I’m not saying that you, whether male or female, will forget individuals, but when early sexual life becomes a quest for the next one, the next thrill-of-the-new, then you get bored with the same-old, same-old. Marriage and the ruts you can get into become tiresome. And it sets up comparisons to prior partners. On “performance”. On fun, on height, on wealth, on various bodily attributes (male or female), on all sorts of things.
Stability, dull stability and sameness, create a burr to do something “fun” again in the minds who have had multiple partners, especially the thrilling casual encounters. And thus, marriages fall apart. Partners cheat, looking for that thrill of the new. The term is monkey branching – always reaching to the next thing. And not only marriages fall apart, but harm to the children ensues. They see, with their own eyes and feel, without a mature brain’s ability to handle it, the dissolution of their family – the one thing they should be able to count on. With the subsequent dissolution of a sense of stability and anchoring.
All deliberate. A strong nuclear family is one of the foundational elements of Western civilization. Of course it’s under attack. Just as is having a posterity. Consider, as a concluding thought, the tale of these two women:
Who, on their death bed, is going to look back and think they had a more fulfilling life? And who, on that same death bed, will have more people there… and more people who care when they’ve passed? Let alone, in ten years, people who still remember them?
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Links (some from me, some from my Jarhead friend):
Cancel culture works both ways, buttercup. How’s it taste?
—
Does The CIA Run America? | ZeroHedge
All credit to my brilliant father who speculated along these lines at the time. I was very young with only the vaguest clue about what was happening. But I recall very well that he was convinced that Richard Nixon was set up in a trap and unfairly hounded out of office not for the bad things he was doing but for standing up to the Deep State.
If my own father, not a particularly political person, knew this for certain at the time, this must have been a strong perception even then.
You hear the rap that these agencies—the CIA is one but there are many adjacent others—are not allowed by law to intervene in domestic politics. At this point and after so much experience, this comes across to me like something of a joke. We know from vast evidence and personal testimony that the CIA has been manipulating political figures, narratives, and outcomes for a very long time.
Frank Herbert, author of DUNE (one of the top five sci-fi books I’ve ever read), said:
“Absolute power does not corrupt absolutely, absolute power attracts the corruptible.”
—
Treason.
—
To paraphrase Andrew Breitbart, if you need T&A to sell your agitprop, your agitprop sucks.
—
Kids, who were at a functionally-zero risk of fatality from Covid, were injected with something with substantially more risk – not just to hearts, but potentially fertility, plus myriad other possible adverse reactions. Not to mention the incorporation of the mRNA gene sequence into their reproductive DNA.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Loving your nation is now being a Nazi?
Yoram Hazony | The Virtue of Nationalism
It’s not “just” a job. It’s not “just” following orders. In many – most – instances, it’s a chance to be bad while being told you’re good:
This is, IMHO, an incredible insight into human nature.
Yet another seemingly-accurate prophecy of when the end is near. From another culture.
But… but… but the Great Replacement is a myth. Our intellectual and moral superiors have assured us so.
No. Only with Israel, because everyone understands all these other places have zero care about what “the world” thinks.
Two things. First, when in the history of America has it been proposed to forbid questioning the official story on anything? And second, do these geniuses at the ADL and AIPAC not grasp that most people, including myself alas, will question the motivation… and, parenthetically wonder at Jews-behind-everything in that? Jewicidal Yidiots.
Here we go again.
Remember, pre-WWII the “Progressives” and the Fascists were kissing cousins.
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning
The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left
And that it was the KKK, founded by a DEMOCRAT, that attacked blacks.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Pick of the Post:
Do I believe this? Sadly, yes. And if I were nabbed by that, I’d tell everyone I could about that restaurant’s deed. But more broadly, this is an indictment on the general ethics and character of our society, that someone thinks this is a good idea to do. Apparently enough someones that it’s a noticed.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Palate cleansers:
—
—
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Come back on Friday for more memes. Same meme time. Same meme channel.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
For the entire sweep of my Jab-related cartoons, see here:
CARTOON: We Trusted the Science – Granite Grok
