Alleged experts at UNH and Dartmouth College will be spending a 2.5 million dollar grant (you paid for) to understand better the disability known as Long COVID™. “Utter exhaustion. Brain fog. Insomnia. Headaches. Heart palpitations. Shortness of breath. Anxiety. Depression.” I have questions.
The study is slated to occur over five years, but I’m curious about whether the researchers will ask any of these questions.
We know COVID was engineered in a lab through gain-of-function research. It leaked or was released to the general population. Was it created to precipitate what you call Long COVID™ in certain demographics of the “community?” I don’t think they’ll be asking that one.
How many of the “patients” experiencing Long COVID™ have received one or more doses of one or more of the alleged COVID vaccines? What is the prevalence of persistent symptoms related to the number of injections? Is there a correlation between extended symptoms and more doses?
My sense is these are not concerns that will appear in their research, but it is impossible to arrive at any sort of conclusion without addressing them.
If COVID was created, absent any polluting effects of alleged cures, to disable individuals with chronic heart, head, breathing, and anxiety issues, then you’ve got a decent foundation for a large class action lawsuit.
We already know the “vaccines” were released with a long list of likely side effects, including the symptoms attributed to what you have labeled as Long COVID™. If the majority of subjects were “vaccinated,” then you’ve got a decent foundation for a large class action lawsuit.
Social and mental health vectors must be considered – given the 24/7/365 terror campaign waged on the public during the “pandemic,” where people have been psychologically predisposed to symptoms or are victims of Munchausen by proxy.
Will the researchers embrace reality? We have a man-made virus, followed by a man-made global terror campaign, to get people to accept a man-made, untested, experimental cure that made people more susceptible to infection while – at the same time – being brainwashed into believing that was not true.
Perhaps we should take some of that money and research the researchers before we set them loose to arrive at conclusions that will likely not consider any of the points above.
HT | UL