What is going on in New Hampshire has just been exposed in California. All of you who have been victims of court corruption will relate to the article below, whether family courts, civil courts, or criminal courts. We have seen it over and over and over again.
It is RICO, and now, in California, it is being investigated as such. It must be investigated as such in New Hampshire.
Chuck Douglas wrote the Guide to Family Law. He is chair of the judicial selection committee. Start there. He’s on his 5th wife, I believe. His 4th wife allegedly found condom (receipts) in his wastebasket from having an (alleged) affair with his secretary in their law firm office. He was also representing the secretary at the time.
The judge in his divorce from his 4th wife, resigned in 2007 for financial fraud – hiding disbarred spouse’s assets. That says it all, really.
“Coffey reportedly said in her letter of resignation that she took issue with the high court’s opinion sanctioning her, asserting that the court was selective in its characterization of her actions in creating land trusts to protect her disbarred husband’s finances.”
Chuck Douglas’s sent a teenage rape victim back to YDC after she failed to name her abuser, and the state had paid for a secret abortion before he filed dozens of claims against the Diocese of Manchester, St. Paul’s School, and Dartmouth College for alleged victims, many of whom had been solicited and offered money if they became victims.
This is NH Courts for you. It is grotesque. They care not about real victims; they care not about children or families. Just check out Open Corporates for all the hidden companies, real estate, and shell organizations.
“I feel like all I did was become a victim of a violent crime, and now, all of a sudden, my life’s falling apart,” Gackle said.
But new information has come out that suggests Gackle wasn’t just the victim of a horrific assault; he was also the victim of a secretive, tight-knit circle of Santa Clara County Superior Court judges, lawyers, law enforcement officials, and reporters known as the Bench-Bar-Media-Police Committee (BBMP).
The history of the committee suggests that the government officials who organized and ran the group – and the “off-the-record” meetings – used it to influence local media and protect judges and law enforcement officials from scrutiny, scandal, and accountability.
Email edited (slightly) from the original
