“Sammy Roth, LA Times staff writer, wrote: “What’s more important: Keeping the lights on 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, or solving the climate crisis?”
The answer depends on whether you think you’ll be one of the folks in the dark or have to travel to centralized cooling centers because you don’t get to have AC in your living space (note I did not use the word home).
We can assume the LA Times staff writer, working at an essential business, expects to have full-time access to the comforts of modern living so that they can “report” the “news” to the people because this is not actually a question, it is an answer.
We know what is more important to the political elite and their water carriers. The sentence that follows is not hypothetical; it is a warning. The planned policy will result in brownouts and blackouts. There will be power shortages. You must make yourself ready to embrace sacrifices heaped upon you to satisfy their political urges. Things they will not suffer because, in any two-class system, there have to be haves who travel )often on) private planes, drive large vehicles, eat from diverse menus, and live in comfortable homes. We wouldn’t want those responsible for your misery to be distracted from their duties.
They took affordable, abundant energy away, so it is incumbent on them to prepare you for the consequences they will never suffer.
It is another psy-op and it tells you something. The question yous should be asking? Why doesn’t CO2 align with any of the alledged doom? How is it that none of your predictions ever come true?
And the big one; would getting rid of politicians and media peddling these lies improve my quality of life while making it more comfortable and affordable?
Yes. Yes it would
HT | WUWT
