A.I Says Entities Opposing NH's Parental Rights Bill Are All Supported by Your Tax Dollars - Granite Grok

A.I Says Entities Opposing NH’s Parental Rights Bill Are All Supported by Your Tax Dollars

Data Points PInterest

When I asked Bard – Google’s AI product now competing with ChatGPT AI (Artificial Intelligence) – who was against SB272, I got answers that were not surprising – using REPUBLICAN NH Representative Mike Bordes (R-Laconia) as my entree into the subject.

After all, he was the guy most responsible for gutting and then permanently tabling both the House and Senate versions of Parental Rights.

As far as I know, he has no children of his own, but it did take no small amount of Union money to fund his re-election campaign (what, Laconia, you can’t do better than this demonstrable RINO concerning his votes against you but with the Democrats?). So my question was: Why is NH State Rep Mike Bordes against NH SB272?  And remember, NH Gov Chris Sununu has Bordes firmly as his pet and in his pocket – and Sununu was the Republican that launched this attack on families by the Left by signing that infamous SB263 that enshrined transgenderism as a protected group (and continuing the shredding of “E pluribus unum” of the American population into tribal sects).

Bard answered:

New Hampshire State Rep. Mike Bordes is against SB272, a bill that would require all public schools in the state to teach about the history and contributions of LGBTQ+ people. Bordes has said that he believes the bill is unnecessary and that it would be better for schools to focus on teaching traditional history. He has also said that he is concerned that the bill would be too divisive and that it would lead to protests and disruptions in schools.

Here are some of the reasons why Bordes is against SB272:

  • He believes that the bill is unnecessary. He argues that schools are already teaching about the history of LGBTQ+ people, and that the bill would simply be redundant.
  • He believes that the bill would be better for schools to focus on teaching traditional history. He argues that students need to learn about the history of their country and its founding principles, and that the bill would take away from this important learning.
  • He is concerned that the bill would be too divisive. He argues that the bill would lead to protests and disruptions in schools, and that it would create a hostile environment for students and teachers.

What?? Er, WHO is actually doing the protests in the past couple of years up until now? Yeah, the LGBTXYZ/Alphabet Mafia. Not the Normal kids (although we are starting to see the blowback from having this immoral sexuality religion rammed down our student’s [virtual] throats.

It is important to note that Bordes is not the only person who is against SB272. There are many people who believe that the bill is unnecessary, divisive, and harmful. However, there are also many people who support the bill, and who believe that it is important for schools to teach about the history and contributions of LGBTQ+ people.

It’s clear to see the bias in this AI model, which is derived from the information being fed into it – Google is no right-leaning commercial entity.  So I asked the obvious follow-up question: Who else is against NH SB272?

And like I thought, having seen their tax money lobbyists speak against every individual.

In addition to New Hampshire State Rep. Mike Bordes, there are many other people who are against SB272, including:

  • NH School Board Association
  • The New Hampshire Association of School Principals
  • The New Hampshire Association of School Superintendents
  • The New Hampshire Association of School Business Officials
  • The New Hampshire Association of Teachers
  • The New Hampshire Human Rights Commission

Don’t believe me? Take a DEEP dive into your school district’s budget. In it, you will find the money spent for the above, gathered from your property taxes. They represent the teachers’ best interests, the School Principles, the Districts, the Superintendents, and the Teachers. All of which you are already paying for, and if you’ve been reading GraniteGrok regularly, you know that each of those organizations advocate for their members…

…and not the people, us, who fund them.  Sweet deal to have a double-barreled shotgun aimed at both your wallet…and your Rights as Parents. And the NH HRC is an NH governmental commission.

The rest of these organizations are also in the tank with respect to eliminating all semblance of Parental Rights in the Government School system:

  • The New Hampshire Parent-Teacher Association (PTA)
  • The New Hampshire American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
  • The New Hampshire League of Women Voters
  • The New Hampshire Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Community Health Center
  • The New Hampshire Transgender Resource Center
  • The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic Violence
  • The New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Bard continued:

These organizations and individuals believe that SB272 is unnecessary, divisive, and harmful. They argue that the bill would:

  • Prevent schools from teaching about the history and contributions of LGBTQ+ people
  • Create a hostile environment for LGBTQ+ students and teachers
  • Encourage discrimination and harassment against LGBTQ+ people
  • Undermine the rights of LGBTQ+ families

The opponents of SB272 are calling on the New Hampshire legislature to vote against the bill. They believe that the bill is harmful to LGBTQ+ people and to the state of New Hampshire as a whole.

See what’s missing (shouldn’t be hard as I emphasized WHICH families Bard is protecting)?  Or rather, whom? Yeah, all of the emphasis is on a singularly teeny minority (but with loud voices and lots of money behind them).

Yes, that would be Normal Parents – the VAST percentage of the population and those that put their children into the schools that are turning against them when it comes to this struggle of “Who is responsible for teaching my kids about morality and sexuality? WHOSE moral and sexual mores should reign supreme?”.

More and more, and with Mike Bordes’ blessing, it’s the school systems – the teachers, the principals, the superintendents, and their lobbying groups – that believe that parents are PROBLEMS.  Given that most of these folks are Democrats, should we be surprised as their Party would rather do away with Parents? Sure, they will protest these words but look at their POLICIES that tell another story.

The simplest one is their dogma that Parents should never have the Right to decide how their child is to be educated.  Your child is THEIRS and your money is THEIRS in accomplishing THEIR goals. Go ahead, change my mind (with data – not talking points). I dare you to try because I don’t think you have the intellectual heft to do so.

So, dear readers, in looking over Bard’s “words”, how do YOU think it tilts?  Us versus them?

Oh, and my next question was this: “Who is for NH SB272?”

That will be the next post and I can assure you, none of them were tax money supported.

 

 

>