The Kansas Legislature has overridden the governor’s veto to pass the Women’s Bill of Rights (SB 180), the first law in the country that defines gender in state law as a person’s biological sex at birth.
Under it, a female is defined as “an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova.” A male is defined as “an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.”
It also defines gender words calling for “woman” and “girl” to be used to refer to human females and “man” and “boy” to refer to human males. It defines “mother” as a parent of the female sex and “father” as a parent of the male sex. …
The national women’s rights organization, which helped craft the legislation, wrote on its website, “This bill takes procedural steps to write into law common sense definitions that ensure the meaning of words like ‘woman’ and ‘mother’ aren’t corrupted by unelected bureaucrats intent on pushing gender ideology.”
The usual suspects are outraged, but they already were so same spectrum, different day. But that’s the Be You crowd—a constant contradiction. You can be you if it aligns with their idea of who you should be. If you happen to have any objection to the gender-bender-blender- agend-er, they try to isolate you until being you means being the way they expect you to be. It’s classical Marxism with a twist. It used to be that you could suffer in silence. Just keep your head down and any objection to yourself. These days silence is violence, so you can’t just quietly be you; you have to be them vocally.
Two words. F*** Off!
Back in the Real World
Adults in penguin suits who want to be referred to as ocelots are welcome to ask, but no one should be compelled to participate in anyone else’s fantasy against their will. The fact that this appears impossible means state and local governments need a law that defines what the words male, female, man, woman, and mother and father mean. A leap that any rational, intelligent culture (say, from some other world) would find fascinating and absurd. Why did you need to do this? What chaotic forces are so prevalent that you must define in law these universal things?
Chaos is the goal of cultural Marxism. If you unhinge even the most fundamental cultural concepts, the foundation of society collapses. The goal of Democrat Socialism is to burn it all down so their economically retarded dystopian phoenix can rise from the ashes.
Kansas just pushed back a tiny bit, but is it enough? Lawsuits will emerge to stay the law while they find a court with a judge like Ketanji Brown Jackson that will declare it unconstitutional (or something). The governor vetoed it, so we can’t expect the Kansas executive branch to defend it. And the legislators likely knew that and did it anyway.
Good for them. Now we wait to see what happens next.
