Remember when everyone who was anyone said the COVID-19 “vaccines” would prevent infection and spread? We needed them to return to normal, which – as it turns out meant making excuses for why they didn’t do that. And they have run out of excuses.
While the approved narrative on The Jab™ continues to include the words “prevents severe disease, hospitalization or death,” (another lie) outside forces continue to press the CDC to admit the error of their ways. Any error in any way.
The agency’s response? Redefine what a vaccine is or does. Nothing. Vaccines don’t have to do anything to get EUA approval.
Vaccines don’t have to prevent infection or transmission to be cleared in the United States, the country’s top regulatory agency said in a new document.
“It is important to note that FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission,” Dr. Peter Marks, a top official at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said in the document.
Is this a bad time to point out that the CDC’s full and proper name is The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?
Is it, not a good time to remind everyone that Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act only allows the issuing of an emergency use authorization if four criteria were met, one of which was that “There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative. Among other reasons, an alternative may be considered unavailable if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergent need or if the agent is or may become resistant to approved and available alternative products.”
If “vaccines” don’t need to prevent infection or transmission, neither the CDC nor the FDA can issue another EUA ever because there will always be innumerable alternatives that do nothing to prevent infection or transmission.
One ironic example; the Public Health Industrial Complex has insisted for years that neither Hydroxychloroquine nor Ivermectin is effective in preventing the transmission or spread of COVID. We know that’s not true but were COVID to start today, assuming their expert opinion was unchanged, they could not issue a legal EUA because we already have treatments that are ineffective against COVID so Section 564 prohibits emergency use authorization.
And then we have the more obvious problem. If flu vaccines don’t need to prevent infection or spread why does anyone need them, given that public health watchdogs already changed the definition of informed consent to lie, hide, obfuscate, redirect, and blamestorm?
The only things the CDC is trying to prevent are interruptions in kickback operations for green-lighting injections they reserve the power to mandate whose only benefit is kickbacks to “experts” working at the CDC.
