We spent a good bit of energy focusing on the 2022 hurricane season in part becasue the experts said it would be above average. Regular readers will know they were wrong. It was below average. But now we know how far below.
Related: It’s Not Getting Warmer …
2022 had the lowest cumulative global cyclone energy in 42 years. Global, as in the whole planet. Forty-two years go so far back that it predates the political mythology of global warming itself and one of its many bold lies. That more CO2 in the atmosphere means more storms and more severe storms. But the pattern is cyclic and trending downward.
Now, if we were like the New York Times, we’d be obligated to present the facts like this.
Global Cyclone Energy Continues 7-year Collapse to Record Low!
It is accurate, but we’re not blaming rising CO2 for the trend, short as it is. The odds are excellent, given the history, that 2023 or 2024 will bounce back, giving the climate Karens something to write about. And while we’d be good with the audience of a New York Times, on our pages, most of the climate reporting is to make sport of how bad they are at predicting or reporting what the consensus insists, despite it never happening.
This circumstance is not wasted by a faction that yells louder and demands more of what won’t do what they claim to fix what’s not broken because the true goal is money and power – controlling the energy markets to control the population.
Somewhere up the fraud ladder, they know what their agenda will bring. It will require them to have that control. And keeping it means the truth must be hidden, warped to fit the narrative. And sure, everyone does that, I suppose. No one wants to admit they were that wrong about everything. Picking cherries might be the only true “pandemic” in the internet age, but the climate cult has put itself in a unique position.
It has to prove its predictions are still valid despite never getting one right and that its prescriptions even address the problem were it real.
Neither is true, but they control the message we refuse to repeat, so they label us deniers which is correct in one respect. We deny that there’s a problem or that your solutions could solve it if there were one.
