In my essay Thought Splinters (Part I), I discussed the idea of short memes or questions that can be presented or used in a conversation to bypass The Narrative shields in peoples’ minds.
Creating small pockets of cognitive irritation, that more often than not compel the mind to turn and address them. At least in my own experience. Similarly, as I observed in my last Monday Memes, one way to get such things past peoples’ cognitive barriers is to wrap them in humor. Just as a “spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down,” so too will humor make thought-disrupting ideas go in and not be noticed until later. Like a combo lube/anesthetic gel on a poignard. You don’t notice the damage until later.
MORE ON DEPOPULATION
I have been on a quest to get people to do this in multiple countries after I saw this video:
I’ve seen a similar one for Ireland (thought I’d saved it but can’t find it on my phone). And a person on Telegram did this for me for their home in Argentina on their Alexa app:
Now we learn that scientists are working on a self-replicating and transmitting vaccine concept. Recall the Human Extinction Movement I mentioned in the first part? Here (link in original; bolding added):
Even worse, think of it in the context of bacteriological warfare, or even extremist ideology. What if a radical environmentalist, who believes it would be better for Earth if the human race were extinct, was able to develop a “vaccine” that caused sterility? What if one racial group were to develop a “vaccine” that sterilized one race, but not another – or all races except their own? (Don’t think that’s a pipe dream. There were serious efforts along those lines in South Africa under the apartheid government, back in the 1980’s, and I won’t be surprised to hear that similar research has been conducted elsewhere since then – Wuhan, perhaps, or similar laboratories?) If such “vaccines” could be circulated through mutual contagion, rather than direct application, think of the consequences.
The bolded part sounds like a heck of a sci-fi movie. Oh, wait. And while I can’t find the links specifically, I have read in multiple places that many nations – including the Chinese – are indeed working on race-specific pathogens.
For a true all-of-humanity culling, one could do worse than read The White Plague by Frank Herbert. Or perhaps the Elites have their own antidote all ready? I wouldn’t bet against it.
THE RULE OF THE ELITE
In Part One I had a video by Dr. Rima Laibow about the depopulation agenda. Something else of note was her citation of the term “Neo-Aristocrats,” as quoted by an unnamed female head of state in this video:
One of the things that struck me as reinforcement of this was this video excerpt – again, from the 2015 Conference on the New World Order (full video of the conference):
And now, not only does President Potato spill the beans, citing NWO but… here:
Thought Splinter: If there’s no grand conspiracy to implement a one-world (likely Socialist) government ruled by self-identified Elites, why do so many world “leaders” keep discussing it? Indeed, have whole conferences on it?
GLO-BULL WARMING
I’ve written before about the lack of curiosity of people who learn I used to be a climate alarmist but changed my mind. And my Thought Splinter, or at least the prime one, focused on the concealment of data and analytical methods – a prime no-no in actual science (underlining replaces italics):
Any censorship in a science, any concealing of data & methods, any refusal of independent checking, and any squelching of dissent & free debate from whatever the Orthodoxy may be are, in my book, automatically causes for distrust in whatever “the consensus” says.
Let alone open data fraud:
(Image source)
Lastly, there is the belief that this is the “perfect temperature” for earth, and that nothing ever happened before in the history of the planet to alter its temperature until man came along.
Three Thought Splinters:
- If the danger is so stark and clear, why is there so much effort put into hiding the data and analytical methods? Including preferring to lose a court case rather than reveal the data. The truth points to itself.
- If the case is so strong, why then the need to outright fake data?
- Why is there a denial of earth’s very varied climate past / CO2 history?
ONE CURRENTLY GNAWING AT ME…
I am an engineer. I can “see” stresses flowing through structures, an ability that has served me well through my professional life. One time, early in my career, I was shown a drawing for a failing component and – without any background on the reason I was in the room aside from a component failing, literally just the part print – I immediately pointed to where I instinctively understood the failure point to be and ask “So, it’s cracking here”?
“How did you know”?
“It’s obvious.”
So I am trying to reconcile in my mind the on-video planes hitting the Twin Towers (second tower crash):
With the utterly flawless, all-at-one-time collapse of Building 7, which was not struck by a plane but only by falling debris:
Compare and contrast the above with the below of a controlled demolition:
And while there are explanations of why it collapsed so uniformly:
IMHO even if there was heat annealing and weakening of structural elements, that collapse looks suspiciously uniform. Note that in this simulation, whose accuracy I am assuming, we see a sequential collapse – and not something uniform:
Also watch the controlled demolition of a Las Vegas building again – sequential collapse. Understand this: This is a planned destruction of a building with explosives planted in multiple places, and even with all that it collapses in stages.
To me and my structural instinct, localized damage to the structure should definitely look like the immediately-above videos, the simulation and the Vegas building – sequential collapse – not a uniform pancaking of the entire building. Even a widespread fire should, IMHO, see a collapse start at a singular point and spread outward as one specific element failed and then that failure propogated outward. And then consider the failures of both towers’ corner structures – the last elements holding the tops up – with such close timing that there was no tipping of the tops as they fell but nearly perfect collapses into the footprints.
Now, am I a “911 Truther” thinking that the government planned the whole thing, flew guided planes into buildings wired with pre-planted explosives or some such? No. But a conversation with a friend – who was an eyewitness to 9-11 as they worked in NYC at the time – sparked this conversation. And I realized that to a committed Socialist, individuals don’t matter. Remember, Communists have murdered over 100 million civilians in their attempts to create paradise on earth.
What would stop them from intentionally liquidating several tens of thousands were that to give them the reins of power they want to start their project in earnest? Now understand, I don’t want to make this leap – I don’t want to believe this could be. But this Thought Splinter is gnawing at me. And while we have videos and eyewitnesses seeing planes hitting, and I’m not doubting that… could there be more?
Again, I don’t want to think there’s more. I don’t want to believe there’s more. But could there be more?
Thought Splinter: The utterly uniform collapse of Building 7 pointed out in a conversation with a friend. In parallel, the failures of the supports on both towers that lead to a “pure” vertical collapse.
AND LET ME THROW IN ONE MORE
At that same place where I worked with that failing component, all my reports needed to be reviewed by the department head before sending them out to the customer – I being a “green” engineer and all. My first report came back with massive red ink. I had used confident words like “solved” and “will fix” – no no no verboten words in such kinds of reports. I had to say “likely solved” and “should” and so on. Nothing definitive, ever. It was ruthlessly hammered into me – NEVER USE DEFINITIVE WORDS LIKE THIS. It was so hammered into me that I talk in these terms now, to the occasional annoyance of those seeing a hard commitment from me on something.
So when I heard that in 2017 Fausti had used definitive language in talking about the possibility of a pandemic, that set off my alarm bells.
This is a man whose entire career has been in bureaucracy. I’ve heard him use, over the last couple of years, all sorts of soft words in statements before and especially after Covid hit. That he said – bolding added – “… there is ‘no doubt’ Donald J. Trump will be confronted…” was a yuuuuuge red flag for me that he knew something was coming. (There was a statement he made in the last few months that was nothing but weasel words and conditionals and such… quite a contrast to the above.)
Thought Splinter: The use of definitive and concrete words by a man whose entire career & industry focus on avoiding them.
CONCLUDING
Of course these are selected samples of various Thought Splinters that have festered in my mind until I had to examine them. Some came in passively – i.e., things I just happened to see / hear / read / notice. Others in my life have been through discussions with others.
What Thought Splinters have you had in your life? And… how can you use them in conversations with others to slip something past their shields, to force them to eventually have to turn mentally and confront them? And what is key to all of these? Humility, as opposed to Vanity. For only through humility can we learn.
