The Department of Homeland Security has published what it calls a “Domestic Violent Extremism Internal Review: Observations, Findings, and Recommendations. It’s the blueprint for the political cleansing of the department.
The Working Group found very few instances of the DHS workforce having been engaged in domestic violent extremism. However, the Working Group assessed that the Department has significant gaps that have impeded its ability to comprehensively prevent, detect, and respond to potential threats related to domestic violent extremism within DHS. These gaps, which the Department is working with urgency to close, may have impacted DHS officials’ ability to adequately identify and address related threats…
Some of the issues they discovered included unclear definitions of “domestic violent extremist.” How will DHS employees know what to look for if the marching orders are unclear?
Other issues include a lack of training or specialized training to identify DHS employees engaged in “violent extremist activity” and how to rat them out.
There’s also no adequate mechanism for managing what the rats uncover and- naturally – inadequate funding for such operations.
In other words, DHS wants more money to cleanse the department.
I keep saying cleanse the department, but what does that mean? The Working Group was kind enough to give us some guidelines regarding behavior classified as extremist activity.
[T]he Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Department of Justice, and DHS, noted that domestic violent extremists “who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021.”3 The assessment pointed to newer “sociopolitical developments such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence” that “will almost certainly spur some [domestic violent extremists] [sic] to try to engage in violence this year.”4
If you work at DHS and are concerned about election integrity or question the approved COVID19 narratives (maybe ask about why Pfizer’s Vax is still an issue after the latest doc dump), you might be tagged as a “domestic violent extremist.”
Observed at the very least.
But DHS is not organized, equipped, or able to identify, document, and track whatever it decides is domestic extremism in the department (odd, because isn’t part of what they do identify actual terrorists?), but they appear ready and willing to fix those problems and get to work.
This is scary stuff.
The Biden Administration uses whatever is at its disposal to find Federal Employees who might not be party purists and remove them from the bureaucratic gene pool.
Given what we’ve seen in recent years, it could result in interrogation, indefinite detention, and all the other fun things we hear about in third-world dictatorships (which ours has become).
And this is the entire Department of Homeland Security.
DHS is the third-largest Cabinet department, after the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs.[4] Homeland security policy is coordinated at the White House by the Homeland Security Council. Other agencies with significant homeland security responsibilities include the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, and Energy.
One final note, if you have seen stories that this report is about rooting out everyday Americans, that appears incorrect. But this is a far more dangerous step in the same direction. It outlines the framework for a purity test that will create an environment at DHS filled with ideological zealots who will then be tasked with projecting those tools and that attitude into the general public.
Not a good thing, that.
