The Climate Cult is in a constant state of panic over the weather and works diligently to lower your opinion to their level of ‘concern.’ The result is Chicken’s Little (like Attorney’s General) scampering about with every forecast. All for naught, but ever persistent.
They are also the first to step up when the weather isn’t going their way to say; you can’t judge by this one storm, event, whatever it is. Yeah, we know that. When are you going to learn?
Never. Well, they did learn to call every weather event proof of Global Warming Climate Change. And by that, they mean the political aspirations of Marxists, not that the weather is different now than yesterday.
Is God so powerful that he can make a rock so large that he himself can’t lift it?
Can you hear all the gender and feminazi twigs snapping? I gendered God as male. It’s one of the few times those groups will ever agree on anything.
That MacDonald guy is a bigot.
Is Climate so changed that it can’t change itself to …. I’m losing my grip on this metaphor. Or was it a simile?
Their goals are economic. The politics of climate is just a vehicle. And the declining dead tree media isn’t about to lead with headlines like precipitation just above the 120-year average. But that’s what happened in 2021.
What started as drought and fear – buttressed by our common-sense factual reporting (minus that little data problem I admitted to at one point – my fault; I was still correct) ended as predicted. Normal. Boring.
NOAA reports 45.96 inches of precipitation in NH in 2021, about 1.6 inches above the 120-year average. In other words, very average.
The 21st century has been wetter, but we’re only allowed to discuss that when “more” is less. Precipitation in 2021 was below the 20-year average (2001-2021) for example, so that can be spun as a sign of drought. Drought means the immediate imposition of centrally planned controls managed by the same sort of people who still believe they got COVID right.
Wrong.
For more than 100 years, New Hampshire has seen a steady increase in precipitation over many solar cycles, actual hot decades, and cooler ones. But no one is going to argue that increased CO2 is preventing a drought problem nor should they (unless it redistributes more wealth to the government because that’s all they care about.) It’s probably something else.
But if it starts to get “drier,” the reason is not you or your fossil-fueled lifestyle (or well-funded or underfunded government programs). Things like the Gleissberg period (70-90 years), Grand Solar Maximums and Minimums, Solar Intertial Motion (SIM), the Baseline Magnetic Field and the 350-400 year cycle of the double dynamo theory, explain scientifically what we’ve seen on earth for centuries.
These things show us why our weather looks the way it does. Why our climates change. It makes sense.
But all that science is rejected by the Climate Cult because it could lead to a different sort of drought. The one where money no longer rains on “researchers” whose results are less science and more amusements for the King who must be kept happy.
A drought in funding for the liars and their lies.
We could use one of those.
.
