While the FBI did near to nothing to intervene in the months of riots that took place last summer, one they did do was fly surveillance drones. Why?
Scott Hounsell writing at RedState, makes the necessary leap. The Rittenhouse trial continues, but a feature of the trial is video provided by the FBI to the prosecution. Drone video.
Why would the FBI be conducting this surveillance if they had no way of stopping or preventing what was happening, from occurring? Regardless of the legality of it, should we as citizens become comfortable with the idea that this is normal? Out of an abundance of generosity, let’s just say they were somehow justified with having a drone overhead, why this specific area? Kenosha riots covered several dozen square blocks of town, so if they were conducting surveillance, were they doing so with multiple drones? …
Why this one drone? Why this one area? And probably most importantly (and in my least Alex Jones-y voice I can muster), how did you end up directly over this shooting that night, despite all the other areas in the city where bad things were happening?
Why, indeed?
I’m sure the FBI has an answer, but I doubt it will be the right one. The Federal Bureau of Investigation was weaponized as a political tool years ago, but in more recent years, it has gotten worse. And while we don’t want to be all conspiratorial, the news did just break about how Hillary fed info to a Russian guy who fed it to a guy working for her campaign (paid through a third party) to create a dossier to smear a political opponent of Rusain collusion) for four years).
Something the FBI spent nearly 50 million dollars to “investigate” without ever uncovering these material facts.
And the department logo still includes the words Fidelity and integrity.