Keith and Arlene Robinson own a canoe company in Atikokan, Ontario called Souris River Canoes. In a recent job posting, they note that they will not consider candidates who have received The Jab™.
“Please DO NOT apply if you have taken any vaccines for COVID-19,” read the job posting for watercraft retailer Souris River Canoes. “We will only be considering unvaccinated individuals.”
They are looking to fill three positions with the unvaccinated because “We stand against government and corporate bullying of people’s right to health freedom using vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.”
Good for them but how do you prove you’ve not been inoculated?
And what exactly is the difference?
If the goal is to fight discrimination based on vaccination status then all you’ve done is chosen to discriminate in the other direction.
Sure, this will stir up controversy, and probably get you a lot of page views and free press, and heightened name recognition, but wouldn’t it be true to the message if you simply said vaccine status does not matter?
Health freedom is not about getting or not getting a treatment it is about being free to decide what’s medically best for you or your family and not having to suffer for it in society.
The owners claim to “support the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Constitution and the Nuremberg Code.”
“You have a right to your judgemental attitudes and opinions, just as we have a right to make our own business hiring decisions.”
You do, but is this decision not judgemental and at the end of the day as likely to turn away qualified vaccinated applicants as not?
I support vaccine choice based on informed consent. Get vaccinated if you want. I also support health freedom. Don’t force me to get vaccinated if I make the choice to abstain, informed or not.
How is sifting applicants based on that any different than corporate bullying mandates?
If medical or health privacy matters they matter in both directions.