Right to try legislation was a big deal. Create a legal path for terminally ill patients to access unapproved drugs or treatments for their condition(s). But the idea faced some pushback in the day by some of the same folks demanding that the COVDID19 vaccine be required before you can return to a “normal” life.
ICYMI: NHPR: Is NH’s Vaccine Plan Racist? – Have You Asked Our Vaccinated White Members of Congress?
Donald Trump signed the Right to Try Act in May of 2018, which many Democrats opposed. The concern? That ‘patients’ would be exposed to greater harm than greater access.
Most of the treatments being blocked before passage were a result of big pharma refusing to release the good. Many objected because they felt that adding more government involvement might deter speedy access—all legitimate concerns. But the primary roadblock was the idea that these untested drugs could prove dangerous.
Meanwhile, at pandemic camp, we have all these untested, unapproved experimental COVID19 “vaccines.” They are unapproved drugs, handed out as fast as possible, with people lining up to get them.
Do they know that they are the clinical trial?
There is no data, and any results are speculative, much like this entire exercise.
The PCR test is notoriously inaccurate. None of the non-pharmacological remedies (masks and distancing) have demonstrable efficacy. The mortality rate for people who die from the flu, almost all of which is now attributed to COVID19, whether true or not, is a fraction of one percent.
If there’s any pandemic at all, it is the political response which includes the patriotic march to get experimental Jab™!
This is right to try without the right to NOT try.
Where pressure was previously applied to protect people from easier access to untested and unapproved treatments, the terminal condition now is “opposite day.”
Safe, reliable treatments like Hydroxychloroquine are banned or restricted, their access limited, highly controlled, and their use controversial. You can’t even openly discuss that. But the rapidly developed, untested mRNA experimental vaccine is darn near mandatory and the talk of every town.
There are pressure campaigns. It is a constant feature in the news. And you will be hard-pressed to find any office practice from your doctor to your dentist who doesn’t want you to line up and get it or who isn’t asking you if you got it.
When the answer is no, expect a byzantine admissions process before treatment from a scheduled cleaning to an annual checkup – for nonsymptomatic people who appear to be in otherwise perfect health.
Corporate America could require employees to expose themselves to this experimental vaccine while developing operating procedures and strategies to deal with anyone who dares not to try.
There are ad campaigns on both radio and television, a full-court press, to keep people both fearful and willing not of government or resistance to untested mandates but of a virus they have almost no chance of getting or dying from while openly accepting whatever the State claims to be the truth.
HB220 to the Rescue
There is no Federal movement to my knowledge to do what HB220 would do in New Hampshire.
Every person has the natural, essential, and inherent right to bodily integrity, free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention, including immunization. No person may be compelled to receive an unwanted medical intervention, including immunization.
The bill passed the NH House this week and is headed for the State Senate. It would also prevent businesses from creating requirements absent a direct threat as defined in State Statute. It also limits a Health Commissioners authority concerning treatments or to order quarantines.
Great bill, but I fear its chances are slim. The Senate, while Republican, is a Senate. They are not the most principled bodies, and ours is inclined to cover for the Governor, so veto doesn’t have to ax republican sponsored legislation.
We still need it. No one should be intimidated into accepting any treatment with which they are uncomfortable—informed consent or nothing at all.
Yes, you can still tell medical professionals not to revive you. Still, when it comes to the experimental covid juice, the pressure is on to accept it because they have also taken over control of what a normal life means, and that needs to change.
