Else he wouldn’t have said that he did on NPR. Does he not realize that Critical Race Theory has been specifically built, not to promote Free Speech, but to shut it down altogether? Yet, “So, Gov Chris Sununu Believes All Whites are RAAACISTS?”, he made it clear he will veto it. Even with that long list of posts on which we’ve opined at that post, it’s clear that both he AND his Inner Circle must be of the mindset that the 97% of the State that is White are RAAACISTS!
CRT holds that if you are White, you’re racist. And now it has morphed to if you are an “Anti-Racist”, you are even MORE of a racist. So Sununu, with his cluelessness, supports the philosophy that you are Guilty of racism from the day you are born, and any Free Speech to the contrary, you’re an even worse person. Glad to see that NH Governor Sununu agrees with that.
So tell me, would you vote for someone that blithely calls you a racist? Not me (and no, I won’t).
Frankly, he has NO clue as to what he’s talking. Listen to him during his time on NHNPR; the question about vetoing comes up at about 46:50 (fortunately you can scroll to it easily) and his answer starts at 48:02. Of COURSE, Laura Knoy sets him up with the issues of “system racism and sexism” WITHOUT getting into the real under belly of what is really posed in this White Guilt and Submission philosophy. His only “defense” of CRT and anti-HB455 is “Free Speech” – with no clue of realizing that the indoctrination of CRT is to REMOVE any note of Free Speech where ever it is taught. It’s purpose is to shut down any dissent or defense and mandate a particular race-baiting viewpoint.
Go listen to that clip!
That’s “Free Speech”, Chris? To aid in a movement that shuts it down? That’s totally bizarre!
Sorry, I am a Person of Pallor, and given I live in NH, 97% of our residents are as well. I am gobsmacked that the REPUBLICAN Governor of NH will just fall in like and declaring (with his support) that we are akin to the KKK. Does he not realize that the three Founders of the BLM are self-proclaimed Marxists? And that this is just another tool in the Marxist belt to create more division in Society?
So, choose one, Chris: BLM/CRT or MLK’s “content of character” – there is not both because they are polar opposites.
Oh, by the way, Chris? This is what some of the White parents at a very posh school in LA are saying about Critical Race Theory:
For most parents, the demonization of capitalism is the least of it. They say that their children tell them they’re afraid to speak up in class. Most of all, they worry that the school’s new plan to become an “anti-racist institution”—unveiled this July, in a 20-page document—is making their kids fixate on race and attach importance to it in ways that strike them as grotesque.
Or is that your intent, Chris – to shift us from a race-blind Society in which race is EVERYTHING? I’ll tell you, I’ve been watching this for years and this is not good.
You really want NH to be solely Race-based when it comes to EVERYTHING jot and tiddle in NH Society? It’s looking like it!
Oh, and one more thing – you’d be further forcing this kind of thinking into our Public School system – think of it as a VERY close kissing cousin:
Christopher Rufo is a national treasure. Someone leaked to him a draft of the new plan for the Ethnic Studies curriculum in California public schools. It will be voted on next week. What’s in the plan? According to Rufo:
R. Tolteka Cuauhtin, the original co-chair of the Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, developed much of the material regarding early American history. In his book Rethinking Ethnic Studies, which is cited throughout the curriculum, Cuauhtin argues that the United States was founded on “Eurocentric, white supremacist (racist, anti-Black, anti-Indigenous), capitalist (classist), patriarchal (sexist and misogynistic), heteropatriarchal (homophobic), and anthropocentric paradigm brought from Europe.” The document claims that whites began “grabbing the land,” “hatching hierarchies,” and “developing for Europe/whiteness,” which created “excess wealth” that “became the basis for the capitalist economy.” Whites established a “hegemony” that continues to the present day, in which minorities are subjected to “socialization, domestication, and ‘zombification.’”
The religious narrative is even more disturbing. Cuauhtin developed a related “mandala” claiming that white Christians committed “theocide” against indigenous tribes, killing their gods and replacing them with Christianity. White settlers thus established a regime of “coloniality, dehumanization, and genocide,” characterized by the “explicit erasure and replacement of holistic Indigeneity and humanity.” The solution, according to Cuauhtin and the ethnic studies curriculum, is to “name, speak to, resist, and transform the hegemonic Eurocentric neocolonial condition” in a posture of “transformational resistance.” The ultimate goal is to “decolonize” American society and establish a new regime of “countergenocide” and “counterhegemony,” which will displace white Christian culture and lead to the “regeneration of indigenous epistemic and cultural futurity.”
This religious concept is fleshed out in the model curriculum’s official “ethnic studies community chant.” The curriculum recommends that teachers lead their students in a series of indigenous songs, chants, and affirmations, including the “In Lak Ech Affirmation,” which appeals directly to the Aztec gods. Students first clap and chant to the god Tezkatlipoka—whom the Aztecs traditionally worshipped with human sacrifice and cannibalism—asking him for the power to be “warriors” for “social justice.” Next, the students chant to the gods Quetzalcoatl, Huitzilopochtli, and Xipe Totek, seeking “healing epistemologies” and “a revolutionary spirit.” Huitzilopochtli, in particular, is the Aztec deity of war and inspired hundreds of thousands of human sacrifices during Aztec rule. Finally, the chant comes to a climax with a request for “liberation, transformation, [and] decolonization,” after which students shout “Panche beh! Panche beh!” in pursuit of ultimate “critical consciousness.”
The chants have a clear implication: the displacement of the Christian god, which is said to be an extension of white supremacist oppression, and the restoration of the indigenous gods to their rightful place in the social justice cosmology. It is, in a philosophical sense, a revenge of the gods.
Hey Chris, let me in on a secret – it’s a SCAM!
“ANTIRACIST” DOESN’T GUARANTEE “SCAM,” BUT IT’S CLOSE: President of Taxpayer-Funded Antiracist Group Funneled Nearly $300K to Husband’s Law Firm. “Antiracism is a profitable industry for consultants and educators.”
Just turn NH inside out – that’ll be your ticket to the US Senate! You’ll leave and we’ll be stuck with the flaming wreckage as all of the needed underpinnings of America Society are shorn off, one by one.
How many bricks in the wall that is “Society” will be left, Chris? Not many, not many at all.
Make you pick up the ones that will have your name chiseled into them.
