COVID-Cultists love the World Health Organization. Except when they don’t. The same can be said of every medical journal or association. When the output matches the preferred narrative, it’s true love. If not, well, kicked to the curb; that’s fake news. So, what do we make of this?
Related: Social Distancing Theory a Product of 14-Year Old’s School Science Project
The World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19 urged world leaders this week to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method.”
“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr. David Nabarro said to The Spectator’s Andrew Neil. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Kudos, points, and a hat tip to the WHO for consistency on that point. The entire narrative at the beginning of all this nonsense was, we have to make sure the Hospitals didn’t get overrun, or so the story goes.
And the WHO special envoy is still holding to that logic (right or wrong), or at least he was back in October when he said it.
We already know lockdowns do not work. Nor does masking or distancing. And it’s fine to know a thing is true and another to convince the ‘rats’ who jumped ship when told to do so that the ‘boat’ is fine and they need to get their tails out of the damn water.
Related: Tom Woods Burns Lockdowns and Mask Mandates to the Ground
As we’ve been pointing out all summer, and they focus on this in the video, the response is doing more damage than the virus. Not just here but across the globe because we do it here.
Globalists wanted their economies connected for the good of all but don’t seem to give a damn about what happens when they lock one or dozens of them down for weeks at a time. They are punishing third-world nations, the poor, and the homeless in their own and other countries while expanding the numbers poor and homeless. Making a different problem exponentially worse for longer.
There is no obvious public good in restricting commerce or confining healthy people. Even the WHO agrees, but until there is a political advantage to not doing it, Democrats and the Republicans who help them will do what they think will make you think they are doing the right thing.
It would help if you told them they are not, in large numbers, or this never stops.
