From the #DyingPaper, sometimes alternatively referred to as the Union Leader:
So what’s wrong with that, you ask, they get five picks and we get five picks. We don’t really get five picks is the problem.
The Democrat “leaders” are the most partisan of the partisan. The GOP “leaders,” in contrast, —because there are so many RINOs in the Party and because conservatives almost always splinter— are not. Indeed, “leaders” like Chuck Morse and Jeb Bradley are well to the left of the center in the Republican Party, and share many of the same positions as the Democrats. Further, where these GOP “leaders” do differ from the Democrats, they are quick to seek bipartisanship, which typically takes the form of abandoning some GOP principles.
The “bottom line” is that under this so-called “compromise,” conservatives effectively get no say on how the maps are drawn. The “independent redistricting commission” will be composed of members chosen exclusively by partisan Democrats and squishy Republicans who want more than anything else to be liked by partisan Democrats and their allies in the media.
In other words, just like the original so-called “Independent Redistricting Commission” of HB 706, this iteration is in reality a Democrat Redistricting Commission.