This:
And this:
So, I don’t know if this guy provides “Paid Family Leave” to his employees.
If he does NOT, he wants to provide “Paid Family Leave” without bearing the full cost. Senate Bill 1 requires non-exempt businesses (businesses that do not provide the benefit themselves) to impose a payroll tax on their employees, which is pooled by the State to collectively fund the benefit. So Carlos wants other businesses’ employees to bear part of the cost of his employees’ “Paid Family Leave” so he can hang out in the Caribbean. Maybe, if “Paid Family Leave” is so important to you, Carlos, you don’t take that trip to the Virgin Islands and you use that money to provide “Paid Family Leave” to your employees?
If he does already provide “Paid Family Leave,” is he planning on dropping it in favor of participating in SB 1, and adding a European sojourn to his Caribbean junket with the money he’ll save when other businesses’ employees start subsidizing his employees’ time off?
