Zandra Rice-Hawkins attempts to Alinsky Susan and Kimberly - Granite Grok

Zandra Rice-Hawkins attempts to Alinsky Susan and Kimberly

“I’m disappointed that both the original posting and response violated the principles of GraniteGrok”

Zandra Rice-Hawkins wouldn’t know “principles” from Shinola if it bit her in the butt.  As I stated here:

That was my first interaction with Zandra Rice-Hawkins – she almost Alinsky’d me during McCain’s run for Prez when she was fronting for the Socialist-all-in union called the SEIU.  I took a picture of one of her “I’m a healthcare voter” voters – frankly a lard-ass holding two plates of food lumbering across the backyard and Zandra didn’t like it that I put her picture up even as I had blurred out her face.  Zandra attempted to use Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #4:

“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

And now she’s trying it again. She’s the Executive Director of Granite State Progress (funded by out-of-state billionaires trying to make New Hampshire to Massachusetts North (best case) to Micro-California (worst case))

She has no shame at all – this time using her “intern” as political bait.  And once she thought she had baited the hook, she tried to do to Groksters Susan and Kimberly what she tried to do to me back in 2011, right Zandra? I got wise to her – she didn’t like that or our subsequent interactions.  However, she set that table and now she has tried it again.

I noticed that Susan and Kimberly had left LOB Room 204 during a couple of anti-Gun bill (gun free school zone, vulnerable people having their firearms taken from them) and what I walked into as I followed them was that Zandra was deliberately baiting Kimberly and Susan with “well, you took pictures of my intern during her testimony – are you going to follow her and threaten her because of it?”.  Well, of course Kimberly and Susan had that real confused look on their faces – they have never done it to anyone else, why are they being accused of this now?  I listened to a bit of the back and forth and then realized Zandra was trying to do to them what she did to me back in 2007 – and I said exactly that.  Kimberly and Susan looked at me with blank looks – and then they caught what the con was.

Poor Zandra – I guess that she didn’t realize that I was there to out her and Susan and Kimberly got some upset.  And you all know what happens when that happens, don’t you? Defense to offense in a nanosecond.  You just don’t want to do what Zandra did. I ran back and got my little Zoom Q4 camera and then started recording – sorry that this is only a partial:

Now, WHY did Rice-Hawkins do this?  Dunno, although I have a few ideas.  The simple reason is that she could to just cause trouble (Like she did at a Frank Guinta campaign event back in 2011).

Sidenote: Sorry but it seems that with the two major upgrades to GraniteGrok since it  happened, we’ve lost the images, audio, and video on that.

Another? Trying a stunt to “take them off the board” in some manner.  You know – silence them?  Or make them look bad for some or future purpose?  Or a setup for something else? Both Kimberly and Susan are big time activists – R-H and those aligned with her would love to take them out politically.  They certainly have been great at tying up their opposition in the past – might there now be some concerted and organized effort to do this?

Pure speculation on my part but perhaps some parts of a puzzle are starting to fall into place.  After all, their “end” will use any means possible – even as they blame Susan and Kimberly for those kinds of actions that we know the Left, AND Rice-Hawkins, have employed in the past.

What a dumb twit.