The Social Justice movement has penetrated your local schools. Like an invasive weed, its tendrils are climbing into the curriculum, establishing itself in the collective conscious. A dogma that turns on an anti-white, anti-male, anti-christian bias. Its true goals demand it.
And some parents in California have had enough.
Parents in Santa Barbara, California, are suing a leftist hate group called Just Communities and the local school board there to end the group’s taxpayer-funded so-called implicit bias training that has a powerful anti-white, anti-male, and anti-Christian slant.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles, was brought by Fair Education Santa Barbara, a nonprofit formed by parents of children enrolled in the Santa Barbara Unified School District (SBUSD).
The primary purpose of the suit is to end this deliberate institutionalized discrimination.
SBUSD, according to the complaint, is violating the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “as they discriminate on the basis of … race” by “intentionally supporting, promoting and implementing JCCC’s programming in SBUSD’s schools with knowledge of its racially discriminatory content and application, which has created a racially hostile educational environment for many teachers and students.”
Just Communities get paid a small fortune to use social justice to indoctrinate and normalize this hate among the student and teacher population. And yes, we’ve seen it here in New Hampshire.
“On November 28th the New Hampshire Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union shared news on Facebook about ACLU Community Organizer Daniel Pontoh’s presentation to Farmington High School students. The subject was social justice activism, and how they can create the change they wish to see in the world…”
Social Justice Seeks an End to the Constitutional Republic
A change that includes the rise in anti-white, anti-male, anti-religious bias. The entire movement is built on overcoming these “oppressors.” The folks who brought you the pillars of liberty in the form of a Constitutional Republic.
Social Justice exists to roll back the freedoms that this form of government protects.
And, ironically, this change leads to a place where once you have arrived, further “change” is impossible. The police state and one-party rule of the Democrat-Socialist oligarchy cannot permit it.
It will be interesting to see if the Title VI argument holds water. If not in California, then perhaps someplace else?
