Project Veritas – well, James & crew have gotten some attention but from the wrong people?

Or is it the ANGRY people?  Like the people knocking on Grokster Mike’s door one night and and my picture fell out of a folder and threatened to arrest James O’Keefe if they could get their sticky fingers on them?  Yeah, these people:

NH AG conserve video to Project Veritas

(Click to embiggen)  The question is WHY and WHOM might they be investigating?  Remember, those of us on the Right, when we saw the videos last Primary Day and then this Primary Day was “how easy it is for drive by voting by the Dems – and how election officials were condoning / enabling it”.  It’s like the latter folks almost already had blinkers on.

But these folks, the NH Attorney General Elections folks, weren’t concerned with the enablers that are supposed to uphold the law – they went after James O’Keefe.  They said for Voter Fraud – we believe it was because “the Establishment” got embarrassed by some upstart now PIA.  So they decided a course of action: payback.

Guess who got the last laugh?  

Read more

Trust is fading that the US Senate Republicans will not cave to Obama on Supreme Court nominee

Tipping Point

And the incessant “asks” for money (with little to show for it in terms of the Conservative agenda being being implemented) have become tiresome and irritating.  A ‘Grok reader responds to yet another “ask” with a promise (emphasis mine):

Earlier today I received an email from Lauren Lofstrom, national finance director for Ted Cruz. My response to her is below. If you want to post it in Granite Grok, you have my permission to do so.

Lauren,

Unlike yourself, I am very sure of what else to say.

Since January 1st of this year I have received over 48 emails or physical letters from individuals such as yourself, or organizations such as the NRSC, RNC, Republican Liberty Caucus and others asking me to donate money. Seven of these just from the NRSC.

All saying that if I don’t help out with a sizeable donation, the wicked witch will end up in the White House, and our hope for tax cuts, balanced budgets and controlled immigration will vanish like snow in the spring thaw.

This is my tipping point.

Read more

Brought to you by an over-litiginous society

Guess  what product spawned this legal warning:

“WARNING: Cycling can be dangerous. Bicycle products should be installed and serviced by a professional mechanic. Never modify your bicycle or accessories. Read and follow all product instructions and warnings including information on the manufacturer’s website. Inspect your bicycle before every ride. Always wear a helmet and use lights at night. Failure to heed any of these warnings may result in serious injury or death.”

Read more

2016 Presidential Primary: the richest guy is now broke??

No, I’m not talking about the Donald – I AM talking about Bush III to be – John / Juan Ellis Bush.  He of what was an amazing amount of campaign cash in his own right from the Bush family donors and a fabulously monied SuperPAC – it was supposed to be the “shock and … Read more

Back to why we should support DC Republi…..crap, I just can’t even being to keep this up anymore

“To a large degree Republicans want the courts to be the final arbiter of the major political questions of our time. That way they don’t have to get their hands dirty.”

And then they wonder why we hate them – most of it is because they refuse to do their jobs the way they should.  Instead, they are simply LAZY and INDOLENT – and willing to take the criticism that comes with the job.  Just like the “old NH hand” that told me when I first became politically active:

Don’t make waves and be quiet. Go along and you’ll get along.

That was in 2006 – he lost his seat and the NH Rs lost big time.  Even worse in 2008.  My response is today is “Stand up for something or you will be put down”. And as you have seen, I have not taken his advice to heart – what, NOT fight for Principles?  The outcome is foreordained every time they take his advice and the Rs decide to be very pale pastel (and then shaft those of bold colors).  And in DC, they are about to follow suit on a VERY consequential situation; from Conservative Review, the sad tale of more DC Republicans caving into Obama’s nonsense that that they have to vote on a nominee (mostly on his say so.  All puff and no stuff for these spineless wonders self-assured incompetents (reformatted, emphasis mine):

The fight to block Obama from appointing a radical to the Supreme Court will be the GOP’s Waterloo. The outcome of this imbroglio will by itself determine whether there was any value in electing a GOP Senate in 2014 and whether there is any utility in continuing to invest political capital in this fledgling party.   Sadly, it appears that the tried and tested capitulation game has already begun.

The playbook is the same every time. Even in the face of less consequential political fights, Republicans start out talking tough. Then, leadership allows the weakest liberal members to begin dissenting from the party line and even trash talking the party to the media. Next, leadership says they have to embark on the legislative process to be fair but still oppose the initiative and will personally fight against it. Then, depending on how many votes it needs to pass, they decide whether to throw in with the liberal Republicans.

It’s gotten old and shopworn.  It is the reason why we consider them to be

Read more

BlogHeadline of the Day

Home Owner Talks His Way Out Of Home Invasion. Just Kidding. He Shot Him. (H/T: Bearing Arms)

This needs no further verbiage

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS: “Obama says he’s partly to blame for Washington’s very partisan environment because he could have reached out more to Republicans during his time in office, LA Times reports, citing interview.” —“Obama Says He Could Have Reached Out More to Republicans,” Bloomberg News, February 11th. Unable to resist … Read more

Notable Quote – Prof. Walter Williams

In 1950, female-headed households were 18 percent of the black population.  Today it’s close to 70 percent.  One study of 19th-century slave families found that in up to three-fourths of the families, all the children lived with the biological mother and father.  In 1925 New York City, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households. … Read more

Project Veritas – well, James & crew have gotten some attention!

Will more legislation come out or will the Progressives / Statists / Marxists continue to water things down such that this will continue (emphasis mine)?

New Hampshire Senate
News Release

For Immediate Release:

February 18, 2016

Media Contact:
Kate Giaquinto
kate.giaquinto@leg.state.nh.us
(603) 271-3043

Carson, Birdsell concerned by lack of protections against drive-by-voting

Concord, NH – In response to a video released depicting election workers providing inaccurate procedural information to voters, Senator Sharon Carson (R-Londonderry) and Senator Regina Birdsell (R-Hampstead) issued the following statements.

New Hampshire voters deserve to have confidence that their votes count in an election and that they are not diminished by drive-by or out of state voters who decide to cast a ballot in a New Hampshire election. The video depicts campaign workers who suggest using a friend’s in-state address in order for an out-of-state citizen to take part and vote in the New Hampshire primary, despite claiming residency in another state. I urge the Attorney General’s office, who we know has chosen not to place emphasis and deploy recourse on enforcing election laws, to take these claims seriously and engage in a full investigation,” said Senator Sharon Carson (R-Londonderry). “This video clearly indicates a need for tighter and clearer voter eligibility and residency laws in the state providing stronger protections to our voting population.”

Read more

Senator Ben Sasse: I will advise and here’s how you get my consent, President Obama

The Constitution states that the President is to nominate to the Supreme Court, the Senate is to advise and consent.  The two are completely separate and are dependent only in that the President must first nominate.  The Senate is to advise and Senator Sasse is about to do so:

“One sub-part of your job is that, when there’s a vacancy on the Supreme Court, you have the right to nominate someone to fill it. One sub-part of my job is that I’m supposed to provide advice and consent on who you might nominate. Mr. President, I’m here to provide you some advice on how you would get my consent. I recommend that you take your potential nominee and go and stand in the Rose Garden and have that nominee explicitly repudiate your ‘I have a pen and I have a phone’ theories of executive unilateralism.”

Laying down the gauntlet with a quiet shiv to the ribs at the same time – well done as there is nothing wrong with “strings attached for consent”!  Please also note that 

Read more

I like this new term for “Progressives”: Compassionate Totalitarians

It is clear that today’s progressives have the same constitutional contempt as their predecessors. I hope they do not share the racial vision. Black voters ought to demand, at a minimum, that progressives disavow their ugly racist past. They should re-label themselves to something other than progressives, maybe compassionate totalitarians.

If you listen to either Hillary or Bernie, they are out to give everything they can think of to those they believe are “oppressed” (even if they have “self-oppressed” for their status in society for, well, being lazy, underachievers, or just being a screw-up).  They see themselves as the ultimate in compassion – they want to provide anything to everyone and fulfilling the positive rights manifesto of FDR’s Second Bill of Rights in which Government must do things FOR you instead of the Founders vision of negative rights: what government CANNOT do TO you.  The former basically says Government will be responsible for you – the latter keeps Government taking over you.

Read more

They certainly are charities anymore.

WHAT SHOULD WE CALL NONPROFITS THAT GET 99 PERCENT OF THEIR FUNDING FROM GOVERNMENT? Government “tools?” How about government “extensions?” At the Environmental Protection Agency, they’re called “cheap labor sources.” Ethan Barton of the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has been digging into a massive database of more than 100,000 EPA grants compiled by Open The Books.

He found six non-profits that got 99 percent of their funding from federal grants to provide jobs for seniors doing EPA work, including retired engineers willing to work for the maximum starting pay of $12.27 per hour. Average salary for a full-time EPA engineer in the civil service is nearly $89,000 or $44 per hour.

Now for me, it isn’t about the EPA part of this (although it does concern me and it should for you as well).  As I have recounted before, this goes on all the time where organizations formerly known as charities (as they used to be known as when they were funded voluntarily by those in Civil Society) all pitch politicians (e.g., selectmen, budget committee) at the local level, commissioners at the county level, and at the State and Federal legislatures get pitched as well during budget seasons.

Oh, they come in with lots of stories –

Read more

Project Veritas: Bernie Sanders staffers committing Voter Fraud?

The Broken Windows of law enforcement (and voter fraud legislation)? Here’s a CLEAR evidential example of how NH isn’t bothering to do its required policing to keep our votes safe.

Really – DEMOCRATS conspiring to take advantage of the loopholes in our voting laws (that other Democrats put in) as well?  Whodda thunk it?  Well, it certainly seems like Hugo Palma, the regional field director for the Bernie Sanders campaign thought he’d give it the ole political college try, doesn’t it.  Listen to how openly speaks (“No, I voted here”)…

…and then clams up real quick.

It is clear that, once again, true investigative journalism is showing how easily NH’s voter laws can be mocked by those that have no regard for the letter or the spirit of the law.  It also shows the contempt in which we should all hold our politicians for doing such a crappy job in writing these laws and for those organizations, like the League of Women Voters and the ACLU, that work hard to undermine them as well with “drive by” lawsuits.

The Democrats are certainly changing the moral landscape – it once was that people had their internal sense of morality to do the right things (and in this case, I would say to vote absentee from where your real domicile is rather than the “one of convenience and platform to do wrong” but I guess Al Gore had it right for today’s Dems: No authorizing legal authority.  No law, no foul.  Strip away the internal sense of right and wrong – if there is no law to strictly prohibit something, who the heck cares?

Especially if it gives your side an advantage in a world 

Read more

“Take the money and run…”

With all due respect to the Steve Miller band (…take the money and run…), Carrier, is.  Yes, go for one of those seemingly “bottomless pit” grants after promising one thing – but just like Solyndra (the failed solar panel maker that Obama gave $500 million to and then ran away (albeit by going under)), we … Read more

Blog Question of the Day – who is it really up to?

The real issue here is not whether Scalia’s successor will abide by the Constitution. It’s whether we will. Consider: in a representative republic of 320 million people, we’re all now talking about how one appointment of one unelected lawyer can radically change the face of American law, rights, and freedoms. Anything wrong with this picture? Why … Read more

And here comes the “Strings Attached”!

grocery bag recylableNever fails: the ever burgeoning government that believes it is supposed to mitigate all bad consequences is at it again – to give to some it is going to require more from others.  And in this case, more regulations, more demands, and putting up a barrier to entry to others (or, forcing some out of business – reformatted, emphasis mine):

USDA: Retailers That Accept SNAP Must Expand ‘Healthy Food’ Choices; 168 Items Per Store

Ayup – here’s the “give”:

The U.S. Agriculture Department on Tuesday announced a proposed rule intended to give food stamp (SNAP) recipients increased access to healthy foods,…

And the “take away” (strings attached) by telling businesses how they will run their businesses:

Read more

Share to...