Skip

Conservative Review has this summary of the Democrat Party in light of the Wikileaks email dumps and Project Veritas’s expose of Democrat operatives openly bragging about inciting violence during campaigns (gee, and I only thought that happened in Banana Republics):

1. Democrats have embraced violence as a campaign tactic. In fact, they have no problem with people being seriously hurt as long as their political goals are met. Free speech means nothing to the Democrats, and they will use violence to suppress any speech with which they disagree.
2. Democrats have embraced voter fraud by “bussing people in,” and have done so for decades. The integrity of elections are a big joke to Democrats.
3. Democrats will sell access to power for donations to their campaigns or foundations. Power to the people is a big joke to them. Power to those willing to pay them off is what really matters.
4. Democrats don’t believe in process. It’s a common misconception that the far-left wants a big, powerful government. They don’t. The Wikileaks emails show that the Democrats want a big, powerful government that serves their needs. The State Department, the FEC, the DOJ and other government agencies were all targets of the Clinton influence operation. The Clintons, in conjunction with their Democratic Party connections, are more than content to destroy anyone — employed by the government or not — who gets in their way.

Note that while EVERY Democrats keeps

Read more

I keep looking in wonderment at all the angst of the Left when Chris Wallace of Fox asked Trump if he’d accept the the result of November’s election and he wouldn’t answer.  My gosh, you’da thunk that he already hit the Big Red Button.  To quote Hillary, at least in 2.5 weeks from now, “What difference does it make now?”.

Sure, he can litigate it if there are rampant stories of voter fraud (which does exist) or other malfeasance and I think he should and I bet that’s what he meant.  But that’s not the point.  So what if The Donald boards Trump One, atweeting away at Flash speed?  So what if he continues to call into every radio show / TV show of record?

It won’t stop

Read more

Of course there is voter fraud – Ed Naile has been hunting those that would steal lawful votes for years.  And even though he has “binders of voters” and has submitted his evidence for years, the Fusion Party apparatchiks (aka, Democrat Progressives and Republican Establishment) in all the right places just gave him their collective condescending pat on the head – and ignored it.  That is, until the guy that’s making a lot of headlines made a bunch of them look rather silly and stupid (my, wasn’t that the greatest, seeing those pompous asses sputtering like a V8 running on only 2 cylinders).  So, does it exist?  Someone else totals up the votes (emphasis mine):

For years here in Virginia I have observed massive fraud – in the registration process, in the absentee ballot casting, in the battle to remove photo IDs, in the voting at the polls. Recent studies have shown thousands of illegal alien registrations in Virginia,

And then, the same problem we have here in NH:

Read more

Lifted from Instapundit – J. Christian Adams (emphasis mine):

Podesta’s right. Alien registration and voting is the next big battle for election integrity, because federal mandates created vulnerabilities in our election process.

Here’s how it works.

Under Motor Voter, registrants can get registered to vote while they get their driver’s license or “photo ID.” How? Well, getting registered to vote is as easy as marking “YES” to the question: “Are you a citizen of the United States?”

As Podesta notes, when you attest you are a citizen, you get registered. It’s automatic. It’s mandated under federal law.

The registrant then signs the form, stating under “penalty of perjury” that the answers are correct. It’s an honor system — but only four states engage in citizenship verification.

Read more

A study from Harvard’s Shorenstein Center of the four weeks encompassing and surrounding the two major-party political conventions makes this obvious. Trump’s news coverage during this period was 75 percent negative; the friendliest week Trump got from the media was the week of the convention itself — when it was “only” 55 percent negative.

Contrast that with the treatment Hillary Clinton received in the same period, which overall was 44 percent positive. Where no news outlet in the Shorenstein study managed to get to 40 percent positive coverage of Trump, all but one (Washington Times) had 40 percent or more positive coverage of Clinton. Four of the 11 media outlets offered better than 50 percent positive coverage to Clinton. While coverage of Trump’s qualifications only generated 22 percent positive coverage, 69 percent of the coverage of Clinton’s leadership qualities was positive.

(H/T: Hot Air)

Three months ago, an MRC Culture study determined that more than twenty TV shows had attacked Donald Trump. Now, with only three weeks until the election, the count has increased to nearly thirty.

Read more

We have had a widget on our right side based on an agreement with Newsmax.

Why was the CEO of Newsmax emailing Hillary’s current Campaign Chairman John Podesta about meetings with conservative leaders in DC? And is mega-Clinton Foundation Clinton Foundation donor, Christopher Ruddy using his website to encourage millions of Americans to walk away from Trump and vote for Hillary?

Christopher Ruddy, the CEO of the “conservative” cable TV and news website Newsmax became famous in the late 90’s for his conspiracy theory that the former Clinton White House aid Vince Foster was murdered and that he did not commit suicide. He actually wrote a bestseller book titled, “The Strange Death Of Vincent Foster.” In 1997 Ruddy said the suspicious death of Vince Foster made Watergate “look like child’s play.”

Fast-forward to February 2014, to find Ruddy curiously making a $1 MILLION donationto the Clinton Foundation.

In February 2015, Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy told the Wall Street Journal, “Hillary would make a great President.” In the latest Wikileaks email dump #9,

Read more