Really? Summer of Recovery?

To the Editor:

Now that President Obama’s “Summer of recovery” is over, we hear that the recession ended in June of 2009.  Well, bless me, I guess that makes everything just fine.

But, what about the nearly ten percent unemployed?  The additional ten percent underemployed or discouraged workforce drop-outs?  The record levels of Americans in poverty?  The miniscule economic growth rate?  The media described President Bush‘s five percent unemployment rate as a disaster.  The media describes President Obama’s numbers as the “new normal”.

Unfortunately, if President Obama’s policies are continued, these numbers, and the personal disasters they represent, may be the “new normal”.  Few businesses will invest and hire people when they cannot estimate their expenses because of the many unknown costs of President Obama’s agenda, e.g., Obamacare, cap and trade, card check, executive compensation limits, personnel policies, taxation, etc.  What business executives will take risks when the government can declare a business “too risky and too important” and just take over the business, dismiss the executives, and wipe out investors as it did with car company investors?   

As long as President Obama and the other liberals (or “progressives” as some prefer) smear business executives and investors, create a treacherous economic environment, and…

Read more

“The Lawyer Party”

A bit dated, but  I never thought about  it this  way.
 

The Lawyers’ Party

By Bruce  Walker

The Democratic Party has  become the Lawyers Party .   

  • Barack Obama is a  lawyer.
  • Michelle Obama is a  lawyer.
  • Hillary Clinton is a  lawyer.   Bill Clinton is a  lawyer.
  • John Edwards is a lawyer.   
  • Elizabeth Edwards is a  lawyer.
  • Every Democrat nominee  since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did  not graduate).
  • Every Democrat  vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for  Lloyd Bentsen, went to law  school.
  • Look at leaders of the  Democrat Party in Congress:   
  • Harry Reid is a lawyer.   
  • Nancy Pelosi is a  lawyer.

 
The  Republican Party is different.   

  • President Bush is a businessman.   
  • Vice President Cheney is a  businessman.
  • The leaders of the  Republican Revolution:  
  • Newt  Gingrich was a history  professor.
  • Tom Delay was an  exterminator. Dick Armey was an economist.   
  • House Minority Leader Boehner  was a plastic manufacturer.  
  • The  former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a  heart surgeon.
  • Who was the last  Republican president who was a lawyer?   Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago  and who barely won the Republican nomination as  a sitting president, running against Ronald  Reagan in 1976.   

The Republican  Party is made up of real people doing real work,  who are often the targets of  lawyers.
The Democrat Party is  made up of lawyers.  Democrats mock and  scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and  Cheney, or who heal the sick, like Frist, or who  immerse themselves in history, like  Gingrich.
 
The  Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who  provide goods and services that people want, as  the enemies of America .  And, so we have  seen the procession of official enemies, in the  eyes of the Lawyers Party,  grow.
 
Against  whom do…

Read more

Smaller, fiscally responsible government, the rule of law not men, and greater economic freedom – that’s extremist?

To the Editor:

The media and some political pundits describe Tea Party people as  “extremists” and “out of the mainstream”.  While each Tea Partier has his or her own views, most want smaller, fiscally responsible government, the rule of law not men, and greater economic freedom.  Does that sound extreme to you?  As a Tea Partier, I wonder which of my views, which I think are shared by most Tea Partiers, are so different from yours?

Both Republicans and Democrats have failed to keep their promises to the American people.  Both have over promised and overspent.  Both extended government services without ensuring adequate funding and too often into areas of questionable constitutionality.  Neither party has the courage to eliminate programs that don’t work, are counter-productive, or are not worth the cost, and both have put our country onto a collision path with bankruptcy and a dramatic loss in our standard of living.

The sad thing is that we, the people, allowed our politicians to do this to us, to our Country, and to subsequent generations when we accepted their promises of “free stuff“ (or more than we pay for).  Tea Partiers say…

Read more

“…Both parties accept deficit spending leaving painful debt obligations to people who don’t vote, children and future generations. This is immoral…”

To the Editor: 

When did Americans decide it is OK to live comfortably at the expense of their children and future generations?  Parents used to work multiple jobs and sacrifice for their children.  Now Americans make future generations sacrifice for us.    

Today’s national debt of $13.3 trillion saddles each new child with over $43,000 worth of our national debt and over $400,000 worth of promised, but un-funded future obligations.  Even at today’s low interest rates, interest payments already are one of the biggest federal budget items.  Projected budgets increase the debt by at least $1 trillion annually for the next ten years, increasing the tax burden on future generations and on ourselves.  Some economists believe this much debt could be more disastrous than the current housing / credit crisis.        

If these debts were incurred to save our country during a war, that would be one thing.  The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost $1-2 trillion, the rest of our $13.3 trillion debt was spent to make life easier for today’s Americans. 

How did this debt accumulate?  Did Americans decide to take advantage of  their children and future generations?  Or, did politicians take advantage of our trust and gullibility?          

Read more

Another message to US Senator from NH, Judd Gregg

Dear Senator , Please oppose the appointment of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court.   It is time for the Senate to re-consider the criteria for any Federal Judge and to consider if our country is to be ruled by the rule of law or the whims of a few men (and women) on the … Read more

Obamacare – built on lies

To the Editor:

While Bev Lapham may need to be reminded everyday about the evils of Obamacare, polls show that the majority of Americans don’t need reminders, they have consistently rejected it since last summer.  The problem as Anna DeRose so aptly put it is, “Does Washington ever listen to the American people … ?”   

On Sunday the leftists, the bribed, and the threatened voted to take over America’s healthcare system with legislation that threatens the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of every American.  The process used to get passage was the opposite of the open, ethical, and bi-partisanship promised by President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and Senator Reid.  Legislation and deals were made behind closed doors, advocates consistently lied about the bill’s provisions, costs, critics, and about keeping your health insurance (the CBO says 8 to 9 million Americans will lose their employer provided insurance and millions more will lose their Medicare Advantage coverage), and the only bi-partisanship on this bill was in opposition as republicans were joined by democrats who could not be threatened or bribed into ignoring the will of their constituents.         

The lives and quality of life of American seniors are threatened by the $500 plus billion cuts from Medicare, in fact 33 million Seniors will be at risk of losing access to medical care according to the Medicare Chief Actuary.  Seniors see Canada, Britain, California and other places where people have government insurance but cannot get a doctor or cannot get treated when needed, and they see this increasingly happen here.

Obamacare creates a bureaucracy which shields politicians when government denies medical care.  If they get sick, Seniors know they may be worth more dead than alive to a government which controls the healthcare they will receive by rewarding or punishing doctors based on their conformance to political and bureaucratic guidelines as happens today in other government controlled systems.  So some seniors will live in pain.  Other seniors will be denied lifesaving care and will die, not only saving medical costs but ending social security payments and perhaps filling government coffers with estate taxes.                     

Americans know proponents have lied about the financial viability of Obamacare.  They know that you can’t claim a deficit neutral system when you raise taxes and cut costs for ten years to pay for only six years of coverage.  They know there won’t be big savings from reducing fraud, how much additional fraud did the President cut last year?  (No extra authorization is/was needed to fight fraud.)  They know that other integral costs have been taken out of the bill and will be added later.  Also ignored are the increased taxpayer costs at the State level to support millions more Medicaid recipients.       

Americans have had a healthcare and health insurance system which satisfies the overwhelming majority of Americans, including millions who have been covered very well for expensive procedures.  Americans know that fixing this system’s relatively small problems (albeit sometimes individually devastating) are best done with small changes not a government takeover.
 
At President Obama’s health care summit, Americans learned that agreements could have been reached last year to fix those problems and start helping people last year.     

But, President Obama and today’s leftist Congress demand a government takeover of the whole healthcare and health insurance system.  They demand another costly new Federal bureaucracy to manage healthcare.  They will  restrict your health insurance choices to fit their objectives, not your needs.  Most people will see premium increases rather than President Obama’s promised $2500 decrease.  If Obamacare is so great, why do they need to hire 16,500 new IRS agents to enforce it and even threaten jail for non-compliance?  Is the IRS the new kinder, gentler face of the Obama government?   

Representative John Dingle just told us why it takes so long for the new heathcare “reforms” to roll out, “It takes a long time to set up the mechanisms to control 300 (million) people.”  Was Obamacare sold as being a way to “control” the American people?  Is that  what the American people want, to be controlled by government?   

Is Obamacare being done to help really poor people?  No.  The really poor people are…

Read more

Healthcare “reform”? Abandon it!

I have just sent this in for publication: To the Editor:  President Obama’s health care summit revealed that Republicans  support President Obama’s stated objectives of reducing health care costs, increasing affordability and expanding coverage.  Therefore, needy Americans could be receiving benefits today from Republican supported inter-state purchase of health insurance, decreased defensive medical costs from … Read more

Share to...