But unfortunately, much of the time, we have not understood the importance of the responsibility of voters to maintain a supportive Congress that is compatible with the agenda of the president.
From the Concord Monitor comes this bit of stupidity by Philip R. Harvey of Hillsboro, NH in which we see yet another person wanting America to be something that it is not (full piece after the jump:). To wit, it is clear that he doesn’t like our political system of governance because stalemate! This is quite clear from the above quote when you shackle it with this (reformatted, emphasis mine):
Many constitutional democracies around the world operate under a parliamentary system. Normally, with that form of government, the people elect the members from parliamentary districts, and the political party having the majority of members selects the individual to lead the government. That individual serves only as long as the majority of members supports his or her position on issues before the parliament…in such a parliamentary system, the legislative and the executive branches of government are permanently intertwined. In other words, there is not a separation of power between the legislative and executive branches of government.
And then he goes on to describe our system. And Harvey seems to advocating for this notion of further breaking down the series of checks and balances that our Founders put into place? So he’s quite sure that such a situation that is far superior to our’s in that our government “can get something done”.
First off: seriously, eliminating the role of the various State legislatures wasn’t bad enough in selecting US Senators? But second, is the major function of government should be “to get things done”? I’ll circle back to the opening “statement of fact” in a little bit.





