Skip

Of course there is voter fraud – Ed Naile has been hunting those that would steal lawful votes for years.  And even though he has “binders of voters” and has submitted his evidence for years, the Fusion Party apparatchiks (aka, Democrat Progressives and Republican Establishment) in all the right places just gave him their collective condescending pat on the head – and ignored it.  That is, until the guy that’s making a lot of headlines made a bunch of them look rather silly and stupid (my, wasn’t that the greatest, seeing those pompous asses sputtering like a V8 running on only 2 cylinders).  So, does it exist?  Someone else totals up the votes (emphasis mine):

For years here in Virginia I have observed massive fraud – in the registration process, in the absentee ballot casting, in the battle to remove photo IDs, in the voting at the polls. Recent studies have shown thousands of illegal alien registrations in Virginia,

And then, the same problem we have here in NH:

Read more

Lifted from Instapundit – J. Christian Adams (emphasis mine):

Podesta’s right. Alien registration and voting is the next big battle for election integrity, because federal mandates created vulnerabilities in our election process.

Here’s how it works.

Under Motor Voter, registrants can get registered to vote while they get their driver’s license or “photo ID.” How? Well, getting registered to vote is as easy as marking “YES” to the question: “Are you a citizen of the United States?”

As Podesta notes, when you attest you are a citizen, you get registered. It’s automatic. It’s mandated under federal law.

The registrant then signs the form, stating under “penalty of perjury” that the answers are correct. It’s an honor system — but only four states engage in citizenship verification.

Read more

A study from Harvard’s Shorenstein Center of the four weeks encompassing and surrounding the two major-party political conventions makes this obvious. Trump’s news coverage during this period was 75 percent negative; the friendliest week Trump got from the media was the week of the convention itself — when it was “only” 55 percent negative.

Contrast that with the treatment Hillary Clinton received in the same period, which overall was 44 percent positive. Where no news outlet in the Shorenstein study managed to get to 40 percent positive coverage of Trump, all but one (Washington Times) had 40 percent or more positive coverage of Clinton. Four of the 11 media outlets offered better than 50 percent positive coverage to Clinton. While coverage of Trump’s qualifications only generated 22 percent positive coverage, 69 percent of the coverage of Clinton’s leadership qualities was positive.

(H/T: Hot Air)

Three months ago, an MRC Culture study determined that more than twenty TV shows had attacked Donald Trump. Now, with only three weeks until the election, the count has increased to nearly thirty.

Read more

We have had a widget on our right side based on an agreement with Newsmax.

Why was the CEO of Newsmax emailing Hillary’s current Campaign Chairman John Podesta about meetings with conservative leaders in DC? And is mega-Clinton Foundation Clinton Foundation donor, Christopher Ruddy using his website to encourage millions of Americans to walk away from Trump and vote for Hillary?

Christopher Ruddy, the CEO of the “conservative” cable TV and news website Newsmax became famous in the late 90’s for his conspiracy theory that the former Clinton White House aid Vince Foster was murdered and that he did not commit suicide. He actually wrote a bestseller book titled, “The Strange Death Of Vincent Foster.” In 1997 Ruddy said the suspicious death of Vince Foster made Watergate “look like child’s play.”

Fast-forward to February 2014, to find Ruddy curiously making a $1 MILLION donationto the Clinton Foundation.

In February 2015, Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy told the Wall Street Journal, “Hillary would make a great President.” In the latest Wikileaks email dump #9,

Read more

Incentivize: Motivate or encourage (someone) to do something; provide with an incentive.

We changed topics, in the comment section at  Treehugger’s Katherine Martinko mental midget meltdown (people are misbehaving and not living up to her standards about eating meat).  Since Jim Gordon didn’t want to come out and play with me anymore, another commenter decided to take his place but in a totally different direction – one can either take it as not understanding one’s own language or realizing “oops, I’m being called out on it”.  And of course, for me, one is never enough so I went after both at the same time.  After all, the key is just to use their language, challenge them on their DEFINITION (which they HATE) and how it differs from our common language. You know, like a meaty dog bone. So peted66616 stepped up to the plate and…

“it appears that the reason why people weren’t eating as much meat was because they couldn’t afford it, not because they were concerned about its environmental impact”

And this is surprising, how?

And then decided to let folks know that we have to be bribed in order to act the way “they” want us to.

Humans, including Americans, do all kinds of things that are harmful to the environment in some way. And, for the most part, humans will not change their habits unless economically incentivized to do so. The one thing that will reliably lead to reduced meat consumption is for meat production to internalize all of the currently-externalized costs.

Read more

Astroturf, anyone?  Thanks to the Wikileaks release of the John Podesta emails, we know that the Left routinely starts up groups, pays them, and then calls them “grassroots”.  That’s their model which also goes far to explain why they have ALWAYS called the TEA Party movement a creature of (get ready for it…..wait…..ok, now) the Koch brothers (er, still waiting for my check, sirs!).  They don’t grok that some of us do it for Principle only.  But that’s how they went about delegitimizing one of the most grassrootiest people oriented movements ever.  And then the GOP decided to get rid of them too, but I’ve already opined enough on that.

So, the value add of this video is that James O’Keefe and friends did another one of their “infiltration” investigative reports and this time, deep diving into the DNC / Astroturf / campaign / agitprop swamp that is the Democrat operational swamp to get to the people that assemble and pay those “troops”.  NOTICE: video after the jump contains course language, NSFW

“In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging.”

Read more