FBI.gov Releases 2014's Ten Most Dangerous Cities - Granite Grok

FBI.gov Releases 2014’s Ten Most Dangerous Cities

“I’ll vote for whoever is the Democrat. That’s all I need to know.”  —Seth Rogen

Democrat-CorruptionAs with my previous posts on the topic, FBI.gov tracks crime statistics based on property and violent crimes. For 2013, the numbers are in. We have this year’s list of ten most violent cities in America. They are as follows:

  1. Camden, NJ
  2. Flint MI
  3. Detroit MI
  4. Oakland, CA
  5. St. Louis, MO
  6. Cleveland, OH
  7. Gary, IN
  8. Newark NJ
  9. Bridgeport, CT
  10. Birmingham, AL

There are…in order of most dangerous…meaning violence and property crimes. So now folks are wondering how others such as New York, DC or Chicago did not make the list? Well, that’s fairly easy.  Having made the list so often, the figures were reported by county or in the case of NY, by Borough. In the case of DC, crimes were delineated by occurrence in the Federal Enclaves from those outside.

But more importantly, Let us focus on the leadership running these cities. The first question that comes to mind is, who are the mayors? So, let us have a look.

  1. Camden, NJ —Mayor Dana Redd, Democrat
  2. Flint MI — Mayor Dayne Walling, Democrat
  3. Detroit MI — Mayor Dave Bing/Mike Duggan, Democrat(s)
  4. Oakland, CA — Mayor Jean Quan, Democrat
  5. St. Louis, MO — Mayor Francis Slay, Democrat
  6. Cleveland, OH — Mayor Frank Jackson, Democrat
  7. Gary, IN — Mayor Karen Freeman-Wilson, Democrat
  8. Newark NJ — Mayor Corey Booker/Luis Quintana, Democrat(s)
  9. Bridgeport, CT — Mayor Bill Finch, Democrat
  10. Birmingham, AL — Mayor William A. Bell, Democrat

debt -generational debt that isAll rated as dangerous cities, rife with violent crime. All run by Democrats, some in total fiscal ruin. Detroit and Flint are in receivership. So…While these democrats follow the cues of their fearless leader, Barack Obama to blame the economy and Republicans, Do you think it ever occurs to them that progressive spending and nanny state politics has anything to do with the sad states of these cities?

 

>