Jeanne Shaheen Wants to Ban Guns

by Steve MacDonald

Tragedy always attracts a parade of progressive mountebanks, anxious to peddle their faulty wares as cures for what ails us, and US Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D- Utopia) is no different.  In response to the heinous criminal acts perpetrated in Newtown, Connecticut she observed that

“We need a comprehensive approach that includes improving access to mental health services, better enforcement of our current laws, and we need to get deadly assault weapons off our streets.”

Whatever you do, do not ask Senator Shaheen to describe an ‘Assault weapon’ because I am reasonably certain her talking points palm card did not include that.

The term “Assault weapon” is a lot like the term ‘Social Justice.’   It gets tossed around all the time, flowing seamlessly and with conviction from the mouths of  progressives.  And utopia looks damn good through those talking points glasses as long as you don’t ask them to define “Social Justice” or “Assault Weapons” for you.

If Webster were to transcribe what follows, directly into the pages of the dictionary, there would be more than a few ‘uh’ ‘um’ ‘like’ ‘err’s’ cluttering up the column inches.  And that’s the way the agenda-driven flying narrative monkeys like it.  It’s all about feelings.  “I’ll know love when I find it” is a lot like “I’ll know an assault weapon when I hear it,” or more accurately–what they really mean is that they’ll ban as many as they can until they can ban more.  That’s just how they roll.

So when “No-Maching-Gun” Jeanne Shaheen says get deadly assault weapons off the streets, we know that what she is really after is all the guns because lets be honest…a criminal with any weapon who is engaging in assault is using an assault weapon, and when a deranged coward enters an elementary school intent on killing, almost any firearm will do the job if they are deranged enough and no one is permitted access to equal or greater force in defense of themselves or others.

Jeanne Shaheen can phrase it however she wants but what she wants is to ban guns.  We know she does, even coming from New Hampshire,  because she is all-in on every other left wing, ding-bat, tin-foil-hat idea the left has ever come up with (except corn-ethanol but that is only because she wants to redirect that subsidy-infused-political-power into Jeanne-Shaheen-Shazam-Isis-Power-Hour” BAM! look at all the federal money I got Y’all for wood-chip ethanol” subsidies instead) so we know she wants to get all the guns off the streets.

Who cares if these guns (used in Newtown) did not come from “the streets” (another clue about what Jeanne really wants).  And ‘assault weapons,’ like social justice, (or ‘streets) means whatever it needs to mean to accomplish whatever goal it is the speaker intends.

Here’s another not so secret truth.  A murderous lunatic, who wants to kill and is willing to steal firearms, can and will steal almost any firearm.  And they will then use that force advantage in a place where they are least likely to meet resistance.   You don’t need the word ‘assault’ to ruin the lives of families when the object of your rage is an elementary school.  Or a unarmed university campus.  One with a sign.

Yes, Liberals put up signs.  They advertise.  Hey–no guns allowed, which means people who abide by the law will not enter the area armed.  Murders, mass murders in particular, are not always as inclined to follow the law to begin with and hey, thanks for advertising the best places to exercise a lethal force advantage of legislated proportion.

So unless your goal is to disarm everyone, leaving the murderous lunatics with the overwhelming force advantage everywhere, and anywhere they choose to exercise it, with whatever weapons they can find–because law breakers don’t give a damn what you ban or why–nothing you say is either honest or beneficial to the society you claim to steward.  Such is the mystery that is Jeanne Shaheen, US Senator from New Hampshire.

New Hampshire.  Yes let’s talk about that for a moment.

New Hampshire is consistently one of the safest states in the nation.  We have a great quality of life, low crime, low poverty, very healthy citizens, and a large number of them are walking around armed with what Jeanne Shaheen might call assault weapons.  Concealed “assault weapons.” And that is why we are consistently one of the safest places to live in the nation.  At any given moment there may be one or dozens of law abiding citizens who are armed, trained, and prepared to defend life and property, even when it is not their own.

Despite that Jeanne Shaheen would like to use the power of the police state to limit self-defense everywhere her bony progressive hands can reach.  So it behooves us to inquire on such matters now that she has told us her intentions.   So ask the Senator, “what do you mean by assault weapons?”

What firearms would not be covered by your restriction, and therefore be deemed–by you–as more suitable for the public to defend themselves?”    (As an aside: Should this class of weapons from this day forward be referred to sub-shaheen guns?)

Or if you prefer… “Do you think law abiding citizens should be able to defend themselves with firearms at all, and if yes, which ones?”

If someone broke in and stole those ‘Senator Shaheen Approved’ weapons (the sub-shaheen Guns), then used them to commit a murder or mass murder, how would that reflect on your position, or your qualifications to make such judgements?  Would the next step be to ban sub-shaheen guns as well?”

And there are plenty more questions we could or should ask but I’ll end with this: ‘After you’ve disarmed us, if someone should happen to walk into a room and start illegally discharging an approved or unapproved fire-arm at the people there, what would you suggest we do before or until we are shot or killed?”


Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

Leave a Comment

  • Assault Weapons….Yeah DATELINE January 29, 1979…Schools had no buzzers…there was no such term as, “assault Weapons” and There was no 24-hour news cycle anywhere….Enter Brenda Ann Spencer….On that day in San Diego, 16-year-old Brenda Ann Spencer, perched in a window with a Ruger 10/22 and began “plinking” at kids across the street at Grover Cleveland Elementary School. She killed two people and wounded eight others….Question for Queen Jeanne Shaheen…is a Ruger 10/22 an assault weapon?

    • allen

      shaheen : “did the ruger have a shoulder thing that goes up?”

      • nhsteve


  • Tim from Nashua

    Excellent observation. For the leftist, words mean whatever THEY want them to mean. Control of the narrative is essential to the Left’s war on free people. Hence, to them conservative christians are always referred to as Extreme Right-Wing Fundamentalists.

    Jean Shaheen, Margaret Sanger Award Winner, advocate of murder within the womb, now advocating for ‘assault weapons’ ban. Just so as the abortionist’s tools are listed as assault weapons, Sen. Shaheen; because the most dangerous place for a child in America today is a woman’s womb.

    • nhsteve


      You got that right.

  • allen

    I actually told Shaheen to her face that if she was going to keep calling my liberty rifle an assault weapon, I will call my Volvo station wagon an Armored Personnel Carrier. both descriptions are equally wrong, but telling my nieces school to look for the blue APC in the parking lot is priceless.

  • Pingback: Jeanne Shaheen Wants to Ban Guns « Live Free or Die()

  • Don

    You missed an important point. In 1999 the Columbine Massacre occurred under the previous federally imposed “Assault Weapon Ban”. The idea that resurrecting that miserable failure of a law might have changed anything is in complete defiance of a place I refer to as reality. That place that Progressives mostly skirt the edges of rarely ever entering this realm.

  • Don in Meredith

    According to a researcher on Mark Levin’s show, since 195 there has been only ONE instance where more than 3 people were killed that was NOT in a “gun free zone”. I think we need to create a new name for a “gun free zone”, maybe “easy victim zone” or “easy way to fame zone” or “they can’t fight back zone”. Maybe we should have a contest to find the best term to properly define what has previously been known as a “gun free zone”.

  • Don in Meredith

    Oops, that was 1950 ….

  • The real truth

    Another load of sh*t from the folks who don’t give a damn about public safety, especially as it pertains to innocent children.

Previous post:

Next post: