Much ado about nuthin’…

by Doug

Fred Thompson
"Dabgummit!"
.
That ought to be the new slogan for the Fred Thompson presidential campaign. While I basically agree with most of his stands on the issues, the position of president is much more than that. In fact, other than serious junkies like those of us here in the political blogosphere, my guess is that most ordinary voters pay little attention to details at all. Instead, they vote for broad themes, and those ever-so-hard to describe traits known as "likeability" and "leadership."
.
Apparently, NH Republicans found little to "like" about Fred Thompson when they went into the voting booths yesterday. Total votes cast for Fred Thompson: 2,628. Ouch! Compared to the rest of the field, this showing is best described as pathetic. (Ron Paul: 16,665; Rudy: 18,763; Huck: 24,363; Mitt: 69,132; McCain: 81,005~ *not yet final as of this posting)
.
There has to be some sort of burning rationale for a presidential run. When you look at Fred’s reasons, they are either (unfortunately) not ones cared enough about by ordinary people, or they are already accounted for by some of the other leading candidates. Try to name his theme. There really isn’t one– or one that isn’t fairly well covered by one of the others running for the nomination. The presidency is about leadership. Americans must be willing to trust in whoever the person is enough to want to follow. If we were going off on a hunt deep in the wilderness with nothing but guns, beer, and chewing tobacco, I would be the first to nominate Fred as the hunting party leader. As president? I’m not so sure. Oh, I like the guy, and believe he would make an excellent president as far as the issues go, I just don’t see him motivating Americans to do those things. After all, the first step is that you’ve got to inspire them to check your name in the voting booth. If you can’t do that, you’ll never get them to support market solutions to fix social security, no matter how good an idea that is…
.

Like it? Share it!

Leave a Comment

  • Randy

    People get the government they vote (or don’t vote) for. Sadly, we’re more concerned about how a person looks on television than how they stand on the issues and how they’d try to get government from interfering with our lives. Oh well, as long as the trains run on time….

  • http://www.granitegrok.com doug

    Randy, you’re right. TV is an important part of the contest. So is handling the new media with it’s intimate access, higher range of knowledge that the also-rans in the mainstream media, including the constant presence of video- recording ever minute of it all. It takes a tough, well-rounded person, who is capable of being sharp as a tack and “on-game” at all times. This will improve the quality of our candidates. No more Bob Dole- types will undoubtedly be the happy result of all this. Sorry Fred– you just didn’t make the cut!

  • Allen

    unfortunately, I don’t see a single candidate other than Fred who will be pro-2nd amendment. if he doesn’t win this will be proof positive that the republican party treats gun owners like the democrat party treats african-americans…taken for granted, because “where else you gonna go?”
    mitt and rudy have been solidly anti-2nd, and on that basis I think will give the republican party a difficult win…gun owners mostly a well informed bunch, and don’t like being called the names that rudy used, or being treated like elmer fudds like mitt did (did he ACTUALLY use the word “varmints”? does he know that small game like “varmints” requires a hunting license as well? does he know that the 2nd amendment isn’t about hunting?)
    if any of these candidates understood that treating the 2nd amendment like crap demonstrates how they will treat the other 9 amendments?
    probably not.

  • http://www.granitegrok.com doug

    You forgot McCain

Previous post:

Next post: