Not for the first time a researcher examining vials of Pfizer or Moderna’s COVID-19 pharmaceutical interventions has found “junk” DNA. Most health agencies identify some allowable limits (guidelines are for naked DNA fragments ≤200 bp and not for protected synthetic DNA inside lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). In this instance, the standard was from Australia, which allows 10ng per dose of junk DNA.
The tested vials produced junk DNA fragments 7 to 145 times higher than the allowed maximum, which is a problem. Why?
A 1999 study by David Dean et al7 showed that as few as 3 to 10 copies of DNA fragments with a 72bp SV40 enhancer injected cytoplasmicly (e.g. how the DNA fragments inside the LNPs in the COVID modRNA vaccines are inserted into the cells) in non-dividing cells, greatly increases their ability to be transported into the nucleus.
And?
only 3-10 copies of these spike DNA fragments containing the SV40 enhancer are needed to be inserted into a single cell for the risk of insertional mutagenesis to exist.
Mutagenesis is the formation or development of a mutation, and it is worth noting that the 10ng max does not account for multi-dose platforms or the accumulation of DNA fragments from multiple injections of the same product.
Every dose potentially (exponentially?) increases the odds that some random mutagenesis could occur, and we know from past reports that a lot of it is happening —another unfortunate win for conspiracy theorists, though it never ought to have been conspiratorial. The Pfizer docs are loaded with scientific proof that this and other issues were known. That the mRNA went to war against women’s reproductive freedom “rights” (that one is for the mutant lefties).
And new docs from a whistleblower in the US military also point the finger at another COVID murder med remdesivir.
A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing 601 deaths of military service members and a high rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials involving remdesivir, an antiviral commonly administered to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic.
According to “The Remdesivir Papers,” some clinical trials were improperly run. In the case of at least one study, results were never made public. The whistleblower also alleged a widespread lack of informed consent for trial participants. …
[A]ccording to the documents, the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 – months before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug.
The FDA approved that as well. FDA. Federal Death Agency? Facilitate the Death of Americans.
The mRNA junk DNA research motivated at least one government body to respond.
Councillors in Port Hedland, in Western Australia’s north-west, have called for the “immediate suspension” of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, challenging federal and state government policy.
The council cited a report by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher that “evidences excessive synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccine vials used for both adults and children.”
Where is the rest of the world while ‘experts’ continue to push these products on people despite the accumulation of knowledge and research showing how unsafe and ineffective they are? Not as far away as you might think.
Idaho’s Southwest District Health will no longer offer COVID-19 vaccines after its board voted 4-3 last week to pull the shots from the 30 locations where it provides healthcare services.
“It’s the first health agency in America to do that,” Laura Demaray, a Southwest Idaho resident and nurse who attended the Oct. 22 vote, told The Defender.
Miste Karlfeldt, executive director of Health Freedom Idaho, agreed that the board’s vote is historic. “It’s thrilling,” she told The Defender.
The board’s vote came after it received about 300 public comments urging the district, which encompasses six counties, to stop promoting the shots.
Board members noted that “if residents want, they can obtain the shots from other pharmacies and doctors’ offices,” Holland said. You can still choose to get them if you want, but that “— ‘these products are unsafe, and we do not promote them’ — and the board was within its authority to do this.”
Is it coming soon to someplace near you?
