In the last election, Hillary Badlander, using millions of dollars she received from mostly non-New Hampshire donors, did what most politicians flush with cash do: she ran a hip, slick, and cool campaign to sell not herself but an image.
Note: If you were unsure, Hillary Badlander is Maggie Goodlander.
In the last election, Hillary Badlander- utilizing millions of dollars that she received from mostly non-New Hampshire donors-did what most politicians flush with cash do: she put on a hip, slick, and cool campaign to sell not herself but an image. In her campaign ads, it was clear to me that she spent a great deal of money on hair stylists, makeup artists, and high paid media moguls(you know, like the ones who brought you all those ads showing how you could cure all diseases, turn your ugly fat self beautiful, ans make everybody love how you smell) who scripted a presentation to make us vote for something that she clearly is not.
Based on my prior experience in campaigns, I am almost certain that she hired a number of “experts” who know how to read the public, who identified the themes that the public would respond to, and then drafted her campaign to appeal to those themes.
Her/their presentation included the thought that she was not married to Jake Sullivan; was not a part of the auto pen oligarchy of Washington, DC; was a true native New Hampshire citizen who lived in New Hampshire and thrived on New Hampshire values. She even gilded the Lily by promoting herself as a female victim of birth issues.
She obviously was successful. Oops, cancel that- her puppet master was successful, and the good people of New Hampshire voted for something that she is not, but which their ads said she was.
So who is she?
First answer-I DON’T CARE.
WHY?
BECAUSE IT DON’T MATTER WHO SHE REALLY IS. SHE IS BEING ELECTED NOT FOR WHAT SHE IS BUT BECAUSE SHE HAS A PULSE AND A WILLINGNESS TO SUBMIT TO HER PUPPET MASTERS’ WILL.( Far cry from the fiercely independent women I grew up with who burnt their bras and challenged men for supremacy)
Over the next several articles, I will present a working hypothesis: Hillary Badlander is not a real person. She is simply a means by which those who own and control the Democratic Party own and control New Hampshire’s CD2.
She could be a cardboard cut out. T
They don’t look to her to think, function, analyze, or promote anything that is right, good, decent, or honorable for New Hampshire. In what many might think a dire moment for the cause of the women’s movement, the puppet masters pay no respect to who she is, and they don’t care. If she were Rosa Parks,they would simply tell her to go to the back of the bus, shut up, and don’t get uppity.
They use her to promote the Democrat agenda that has nothing to do with the needs of voters in CD2.
To support this working hypothesis, consider 2 relevant facts:
1st, if you look at the federal government’s website posting on money contributed to her campaign, you will see that very little money comes from New Hampshire residents. I’m not sure if she’s collected 2.9 million or 4.9 million, but it’s a lot of money. Much of it comes from places like Virginia, Washington DC, California, Massachusetts, New York- any place but New Hampshire.
Much of it comes from George Soros’s open society, “charitable” organizations like the Kellogg Foundation ( whose seemingly sole purpose is to provoke a communist takeover of the United States), and Act Blue (which is presently being investigated by the federal government for fraud and a variety of other charges, with allegations that they receive money from foreign countries. In a recent hearing, the head of Act Blue took the 5th amendment rather than answer questions.
To sit in front of Congress and to assert that answering basic questions like “where did all the money come?” from, will lead to a criminal prosecution of the witness may not be a good source of funds for a legitimate candidate).
Why would anybody- why would all of these organizations and big-moneyed non-New Hampshire interests- be pouring so much money into Hillary Badlander’s campaign? Is it because she has sponsored outstanding legislation that benefits New Hampshire voters? I’ve checked with several sources, and the number of bills that she has sponsored can be counted on fewer than 10 fingers. I’ve read each of them, and I find very little of significance and even less relevance for the needs of New Hampshire voters. What I did find, however, is that she votes for the Democrat agenda 95% of the time.
Hillary Badlander votes 95% of the time for the democratic agenda.
Secondly, Hillary Badlander exudes an extraordinary amount of energy to distance herself from the society that she thrives in: Jake Sullivan is her husband; Hillary Clinton is her mentor; Washington DC is her real home. If you look at her campaign, you won’t see her husband; you won’t see the wedding picture where Hillary Clinton is smiling her sardonic smile; and you won’t see the lavish lifestyle that she lives in Washington, DC.
No doubt her puppet masters determined that associating her with any of these would lead to her downfall and ruin her image as a native New Hampshire resident living a native New Hampshire life and loving native New Hampshire values.
Theory: that image of her New Hampshire values- none of it’s true. The image is not the reality, and the society for the prevention of cruelty to stupid people patiently asserts its core position: to avoid the effects of the cruelty to be imposed upon stupid people who vote for Hillary Badlander… who she really is must be made known.
SHE IS THE ONE WHO WILL BRING THE DOMOCRAT/SOCIALIST/PROGRESSIVE AGENDA TO NEW HAMPSHIRE.
What does that look like?
FIRST: THEY HATE US AND EVERYTHING NEW HAMPSHIRE.
New Hampshire voters are patriots who love America. The real Hillary Badlander- the one who votes for the democratic agenda 95% of the time-promotes an agenda that is at best labeled “I hate America; I am not proud of America; I will not wave the American flag on July 4th; I don’t care to celebrate Americas 250th BIRTHDAY BECAUSE I AM ASHAMED OF AMERICA (it is a racist, white colonial power that stole the land and oppresses its people).
In other words, the real Hillary Badlander will bring to the table everything that New Hampshire patriots and citizens don’t want.
Proof: CNN is arguably the most pro Democratic Party propaganda machine to be found on the Internet. I truly believe that if it’s on CNN, it’s not true… It’s a lie. The exception comes when they promote a story that inflicts a serious wound on their own causes. In other words, when they admit that they are idiots, morons, and vile, malicious people, I think there is some benefit to reading what they have to say.
In a recent article, CNN published a poll that they either commissioned, paid for, or believe in, that states clearly that 73% of those who self-identify as Democrats will NOT fly the American flag on July 4th. They further found that 71% of Democrats are NOT proud to be Americans. 71% will NOT celebrate July 4th.
Hillary Badlander votes for the democratic priorities 95% of the time. The democratic priorities are basically summarized: I am not a patriot and I will not celebrate my country’s 250th birthday. HILLARY BADLANDER votes for this policy 95% of the time.
Those who hate America will be telling her what to do… just by paying for her hair, nails, makeup, clothing, and creating her slick campaign agendas.
Simple thought: Hillary Badlander is merely a placeholder for the Democratic Party; The Democratic Party hates America; Hillary Badlander will follow the party line and vote for the democratic priorities, thus gutting what most New Hampshire patriots and citizens admire, respect, and desire.
HOW BAD WILL THAT BE TO ELECT SOMEONE WHO IS NOT PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN? Consider the recent decision of a federal court in Massachusetts. The judge in the case, the Honorable Angel Kelly, issued an injunction barring the federal government from removing certain exhibits from national parks.
Judge Angel Kelly was appointed on May 12th, 2021, by President Joe Biden, and, as far as I can tell by her ruling and background, is clearly one of the BIDEN progressives. (Hillary Badlander, if you can recall, worked in the Joe Biden White House, worked as a lawyer on the impeachment committee against President Trump, and probably had day-to-day contact with the auto pen).
At issue in the subject case was the erection of certain signs at national parks and national historical monuments that promoted a far-left political agenda. The National Park system decided to take them down and return to its mission of being nonpartisan, non-political national parks.
To use one example (and to make a point most relevant to citizens of New Hampshire), one of the signs, or a series of signs, that were taken down was at Bunker Hill in Boston. Go back and check: the patriots from New Hampshire marched to the double quick to Boston in a miracle of patriotic fervor. After marching, they did not sleep but worked through the night, erecting a fortified earthwork that would be critical to defeating the British the following day. (A British soldier who went to bed before the New Hampshire patriots began their work and awoke to a massive breastwork built on very short notice remarked” Oh shit.”)
In the town of Hollis, there is a monument to 83 farmers who immediately dropped what they were doing and marched from Southern New Hampshire to Boston to participate in this effort. I would suggest that anyone in New Hampshire who has any sense of our history and love of our country considers what they did that day to be commendable, worthy of admiration and respect.
The Democratic Party, however, is not counted amongst such folks. At the Bunker Hill monument, the Democratic Party under Joe Biden erected signs promoting the value of illegal immigration, the oppression of women, and the evils of slavery.
“We put our lives, our land, our freedom on the line that day,” those New Hampshire Patriots might say.
“Why can’t you just at least thank us?” they might ask.
“Because you are white, racist oppressors, and you built the country we are ashamed of,” is the response of the agenda Hillary Badlander votes for 95% of the time
The Judge, in her ruling, declared that the federal government had no right to take down the democratic party’s version of history. She declared that the president has no authority over the national parks, that they are a separate legal entity that operates outside the executive branch of government and is not subject to the executive branch’s control.
The United States Supreme Court has previously ruled that this is a VOID, empty, and useless analysis. The Democratic Party, however, continues to promote it, and even though the Supreme Court has told them that it is unconstitutional, they don’t care. They seem to have the attitude that they can continue to make rulings despite the Supreme Court’s decisions and enforce them with a devil-may-care attitude of “I did it, go to hell.”
Hillary Badlander votes for the Democratic Party policies and principles 95% of the time. What New Hampshire voter would vote for someone who would put a sign at the Bunker Hill monument promoting illegal immigration and detracting from the true history of Bunker Hill by talking about oppression of women that was corrected in the 1920s by a constitutional amendment?
Hillary Badlander votes for the democratic party’s policies and procedures 95% of the time. If you vote for her, you’re voting for people that hate America and enforce their hate by appointing judges that disregard the law and impose the far-left policies upon the good people of New Hampshire.
Today I speak of their hatred for the American flag and for our history as a country. Tomorrow, WHY DOES HILLARY BADLANDER TELL YOUR 13-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER SHE MUST DRESS AND UNDRESS IN FRONT OF 15-YEAR-OLD BOYS?
