Bow-Dunbarton School Superintendent Ms. Marcy Kelley, fresh off polishing her jackboots on the reputation of one local dad who supports girls’ sports, has taken down another. Kyle Fellers got “the letter” with the School Administrative unit letterhead telling him, in essence, he’s not the sort of person they want around. He’s been banned from all school events and property until the end of the fall sports season.
His crime? Speech they didn’t like (it’s so damn trendy these days). I’m sure there has to be a conversation somewhere behind the velvet rope about misinformation or disinformation. The jackbooted super and her School Administrative Unit stormtroopers were outraged (can you believe those people) over a parent (or a few of them) wearing subjectively offensive wrist attire.
You know, Ms. Kelley sounds like the sort of intellectual who supports sex work (just guessing), so I can’t see how XX should offend her unless she thinks it’s short one character (XXX).
[Become ungovernable -You can buy the pink wristband here]
As for the parents, Kyle and Anthony wore pink wristbands with two Xs to a game to support girls and sports in their town. The district then interrupted the game to make a scene and an example of them—and toss them out. I’ve suggested they also wear pussyhats next time – who doesn’t love those? With the weather getting cooler, they keep your ears toasty warm.
Since they’ve been banned (the dads, not the pussyhats), someone will have to fill in. They can slip a piece of paper into the program like they do with Playbill’s on Broadway. Today’s supporters of girls’ sports will be played by (blank), and while we wait, let us consider what example exactly, Ms. Marcy Kelley hath made.
She knows how to get her district sued; I have it on good authority that this is imminent.
As Ann Marie pointed out yesterday, Marcy has (at the same time) contradicted her district’s documented High School Competencies. She did not engage positively with social and political challenges and she lacks the ability to work with others who have differing viewpoints. For thee and not me, I suppose.
Then there’s that bothersome bit of parchment signed 237 years and six days ago that denies her right to prohibit peaceful expression (protected speech), her being from the government, and all.
I know it took some time before the Constitution was formally ratified and the appropriate amendment added, but it’s been around long enough that she’s probably seen it or at least heard of it, the alleged educator thing and all. I can imagine it printed on the roll next to the bowl where she sits and contemplates social justice before wiping her backside with it (a gift from someone in her friend group in this theoretical).
By the way, Ms. Kelley’s LinkedIn profile appears to have gone missing, assuming she had one (don’t they all?). I did not do an extensive search, but there was no other readily identifiable social media presence, either. I’m sure it will turn up; our readers are good at ferreting out that sort of thing. And if not, why?
In the meantime, Frauline Kelley has doubled down on her unconstitutional tick and will, I suspect, find other ways to be bothersome to taxpayers whose municipal bond she has put at risk. It is a problem the lawyers will have to dance with while we wait for der Fuhrer to be forced to rescind the ban on any parents who’ve dared to rustle her Marxist post-modernist CRT DEI jimmies.
And, since there will be more school sports events in the coming weeks and months. Maybe the district would like to cut its losses and, instead of tolerating unconstitutional acts against taxpayers and voters, ban Ms. Kelley instead.
