I get a lot of tips about geoengineering. I also get a lot of tips about how the Jews, despite having 4000 years to do it, are taking over the world. There’s only so much bandwidth available, so I have to skim, sideline, or ignore some things—not just those two. I look. I may even chase the source, but spending editorial time is a different matter.
I have no objection to sharing other people’s thoughts, their op-eds, and our authors are free to pursue any subject at their leisure or with the enthusiasm of a squirrel on Red Bull.
It is also worth noting that some people who want me to love and embrace their idea rather than write about it themselves are not exactly building confidence or support. I’m not excited about it; they are, but they want me to write about it and effectively take ownership.
Please feel free to write a piece about any subject we at the ‘Grok are not, in your opinion, paying nearly enough attention to. This is particularly true of candidates, issues, or legislation. Tell us what and why, and the community will debate it, either embracing it or beating you up rhetorically —probably both.
My disinterest doesn’t mean any topic lacks legitimacy, is not newsworthy, or is not worth someone’s attention, on some platform, somewhere; just not mine at the moment. I have to want to write about it, feel a need to do that, and then when it all lines up, I do.
Today, I want to write about this.
This particular story made the grade and, ironically, links both of the afore-mentioned subjects I don’t typically spend time on.
Israeli-U.S. geoengineering company Stardust Solutions has announced a $60 million fundraising round for its efforts to block the sun by spraying particles into the atmosphere.
Stardust says they have created a powder that they promise “wouldn’t accumulate in humans or ecosystems, and can’t harm the ozone layer or create acid rain like the sulfur-rich particles from volcanoes.”
I’m not sure what Jews gain by blocking the sun, but then I’m not sure what anyone gains by blocking the sun with anything but an umbrella, a visor, or their hand (so they can see how stupid this idea is). There is nothing about our current post-glacial warming period that warrants it. Human flourishing throughout history waits patiently for the cold to recede so that it can excel and expand. And even if man had an infinitesimally tiny impact, that warming would be beneficial to everyone and everything.
Climate change is an economic-political program that has nothing to do with the temperature. Dopes parting with their own millions just in case is no one’s business until it affects everyone, and this is that.
There are also two absolute truths about the climate cult. Their inability to tell us what will happen based on any set of parameters (and how they have been wrong about everything so far) . And that there is no proof that any of their solutions would make any positive difference (evidence to date is that doing nothing has better outcomes).
And it’s been a lot warmer. CO2 mitigation outside of spacecraft and submarines is a stupid idea. And blocking the sun is even dumber.
- Solar Panel Addicts Suggest Blocking Out the Sun
- Supervillain Bill Gates Wants to “Block-Out” the Sun (maybe not after last week)
- Conspiracy Theory No Longer: Unregulated US Climate Engineering Created Heat Waves In Europe
As with the computer models used by the climate cult, they have no Damn clue what might happen during testing and research to answer that question.
The startup will use the money to begin “controlled outdoor experiments” as soon as April, according to a POLITICO report that broke the news. “Those tests would release the company’s reflective particles inside a modified plane flying about 11 miles (18 kilometers) above sea level.”
Such technology is “thinly researched and mostly unregulated,” POLITICO notes.
It could even “disrupt global weather patterns and trigger geopolitical conflict.”
The investors were reportedly just “putting their trust in the concept,” instead of demanding proof that tampering in such a significant and dangerous way with sunlight won’t unleash irreversible atmospheric or geopolitical fallout.
When your lab is the entire atmosphere instead of some cloistered enclave in, say, Wuhan, China, well, different rules apply. No one affected is consenting to the potential side effects. It is literally why everyone on this train objects to it in the first place.
Inconvenient Truth
We already know that this has nothing to do with climate and everything to do with military applications, but isn’t this a little bit like the risk of nuclear war? Fallout, literally, is not confined to the target area. If we learned nothing from that bit of physics, it is that the weather will manage the output in ways we cannot predict, to the detriment of many souls, often at great distances, unconnected in any way to the action.
Blocking sunlight will cool the planet. We know this from history. Volcanic eruptions affect global temperature; therefore, any sum of similar particles will do the same. We don’t need to test the theory.
More than 590 climate scientists and governance scholars now support a worldwide moratorium on such experiments involving the sun, and have called for an ‘International Non-Use Agreement on Solar Geoengineering.’
Nevertheless, Stardust has now raised a total of $75 million for its sun-blocking scheme.
The fundraising haul was led by Wyoming-based climate technology firm Lowercarbon Capital.
Stardust is registered in Delaware but headquartered near Tel Aviv, Israel.
It has big plans and needs federal muscle to carry them out.
The company is looking to secure government contracts for “deploying its technology at a global scale,” according to POLITICO.
States have passed or considered legislation outlawing it, but it’s useless. You need specific federal or international laws, along with an enforcement mechanism. The globalists want this crazy so no chance there. And Nations have limited recourse, the same as states, unless you want to triple their tariffs if they don’t stop.
That might work.
