The party that doesn’t know what a woman is happens to be the one that defends “mostly peaceful” protests. But that’s not what they’re protesting. No King’s Day attendees had signs that said “protesting is not illegal.”
No shit. Everyone knows this. It is a fundamental right, protected by the First Amendment. What they may not know, and the sign holders may not either, but should be asked, is what constitutes a protest?
Or, a better question might be, is this illegal?
Is it illegal for a guy on the side of the road to throw bricks or rocks at you in your moving vehicle, or is it a protest?
If someone lights your car, your place of business, or your home on fire, is that illegal, or is it a protest?
Is it assault if someone throws things at you like bricks, bottles of urine, or other projectiles?
And, the more important question: is it possible to express an opinion or an opposing opinion alone or in a group without doing any of those things? Of course it is?
So why can’t Lefties do that without doing the other stuff?
Some of them can.
Here in New Hampshire, even during the BLM “parades” to honor the criminal drug user, there was no violence or vandalism. Part of the reason for this was the very real fact that in the Granite State the FO after the FA has to consider who or how many law-abiding citizens present are armed. Not knowing who might know when it is lawful to shoot someone in a threatening situation has the predictable effect of decreasing the likelihood of unnecessary violence.
It also has the sobering effect of not attracting out-of-state thugs bussed in to use protests to engage in illegal behavior. They bus in protesters. They have, too. But the people who just want to see your corner of the world burn (so far) stay away for reasons the left can’t rightly admit. The mystery of concealed carry, we could call it—armed law-abiding citizens. New Hampshire’s events and protests often have numerous such individuals mixed in them, and no one ever gets shot. No blood in the streets. No wild west chaos.
Weird. Liberals are usually so right about everything.
That’s a joke.
Dem leadership are a bunch of lying psychopaths misleading otherwise honest, hard-working people down the path to their political insanity, which includes convincing them that violent protests are just protests and anyone who would protect them without the violence is a threat to Democracy.
If the above examples didn’t drive home the point, if it’s violence when it happens to you, it’s violence when it happens to other people.
One more point.
You were all at these protests, whining about how this government doesn’t allow protests.
Why would the government you pretend exists allow you to do that?
Dopes.
