At least one estimate suggests that there are 158,464,880 unique books in the world. At least one million are available online. How many of these are banned or censored by your public school library?
I’m using the groomer’s definition. A book can be accessible in print or electronically, delivered to a device or your door within minutes or days, but because someone does not want it on a school library shelf or accessible through a school-sponsored reading app, they call it book banning.
I’m going to guess that the average “school library” in my state bans (remember, their definition) at least 157 million titles, give or take. It’s probably a lot more than that.
They also ban thousands of periodicals, audio, video, maybe hundreds of thousands in total or of each. That makes your average “public library” the most fascistic book banner in your town, city, or county – again, using their definition. And that’s the rub. The liars parading around your state and mine screaming about not banning books are – as I have argued previously – and, by their definition, the worst book banners in human history.
They have “banned” more books than any religion or monarch, and Hitler’s got nothing on them.
This is, of course, absurd, just like their obsession with calling parents who don’t want their kids subjected to age-inappropriate material book banners. We’re discussing material you can’t show or read out loud at a public meeting or on television. Does that mean the town council and local “news” affiliates have banned these books? It must otherwise they’d be sharing their content with the world, which they refuse to do.
Bigots.
All of which brings us to the actual matter at hand. Priorities. Given the 158,464,880 or so choices a school or public library could make available, why shun more mainstream titles to make room on the shelf for books about cutting, adult-child sex, drug and alcohol use, suicide, or anything of a sexually explicit nature, as text or in drawings, cartoon, or other images.
Why are librarians exempt from the charge of groomer for allowing – even encouraging – access to sexually explicit material for minors? Have any pedophiles considered calling themselves librarians? It seems no less far-fetched than a 220-pound bearded sexual predator claiming to be a woman to gain access to the ladies’ room.
Identify as a librarian, and the proglodytes will not only praise you for grooming children but accuse anyone who tries to stop you, arrest or prosecute you as a bigot, and a book banner.
Self-identify a librarian, and maybe they’ll even insist you be removed from the sex offender registry.
