I can hear the refrain. You are kicking a dead horse. Maybe, but you could also call it adopting the proper left-wing approach. Democrats never drop anything. We’re still hearing Hands Up, Don’t Shoot, or how Trayvon Martin was just a tiny lad when George Zimmerman had to shoot him to avoid death-by-sidewalk as wee little Trayvon repeatedly smashed the full-grown man’s head to the ground.
Career criminal George Floyd died of a self-ingested Fentanyl overdose in police custody. Trump never said “very fine people” in the context advertised (since admitted by major media but not widely disseminated). There are rank-and-file Dems who continue to flood social media with stories about the Steele Dossier (a debunked act of treason), along with scores of other lies. Summarized, they’ve got zombies who can’t let go, and we tend to move on even when we shouldn’t, like now.
.
November is Coming
News broke yesterday morning that Kamala Harris unofficially collected enough delegates to be crowned the Democrat nominee for president. Evidence, I would suggest, of both desperation and mass psychosis. The desire to imprint on anything to get past the disastrous weeks since Biden’s debate debacle. Not that it matters. As I wrote here on Substack, “Be they Hypocrats, Proglodytes, or Demorrhoids, elected Democrats destroy everything they touch. Change the name, sex, gender, age, or color, and the results are painfully the same.”
The Obamas called for a fair and open convention, so this has to gall at least a bit (unless, as Mark Steyn suggests, that was nothing more than bad political theater), but if the request was genuine, why didn’t they drop a name? I’m certain Kamala isn’t their dream candidate and arguably a step down from dementia Joe. Who do they propose, and why keep it so close to the vest while Kamala collected collectivists? Harris is the Clinton’s pick. The Obamas hate the Clintons, and vice versa. They represent monarchs with claims to the same throne. And perhaps it is a distraction without a difference, except that Kamala is strategically in a much worse position. She was in the Biden White House. She knew about Joe’s incapacity firsthand and kept quiet or was told to be quiet. What sort of Commander in Chief is that? Not much different than the one she wishes to succeed.
Hidin’ With Biden
Meanwhile, RFK Jr. continues to toil away at the narrative mill of every third-party presidential candidate. He’s another Rodney Dangerfield candidate who “can’t get no respect.” But he’s a smart guy, he is not new to the game, and he sees Harris as weak with a huge vulnerability. “She was seeing the president every day, and she was telling the American public again and again, ‘he is completely capable of running the country. There’s no signs of a deterioration. There’s no signs of cognitive impairment.’ And that clearly was not true.” He continued, “Whoever she runs against, she has a big vulnerability … because she’s been the concealer in chief.”
The Democrats lining up in fealty to the latest thing (Kamala) will run cover, but as a matter of national security, the problem of Joe’s incapacity isn’t going away. The debate exposed more than Joe. Everyone who knew, and it seems likely that more knew than will ever admit or can be proven, is culpable to the argument, but no one more than Kamala, the Bidens, and the White House Staff. An issue that extends to everything they touched during Joe’s tenure. A thing they tried to pin on Donald Trump (mental decline), a projection that galvanized how Joe was compromised, and they knew it. We should do our best not to let that go. Not now. Not any day between this and the election. Not ever.
