Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

[NOTE: This was originally posted on February 25th. We are bumping this back up to the top as a reminder for those who are participating in today’s elections in towns across the Granite State not to be fooled by this thinly-veiled attempt at paving the way for broad-based taxes and the destruction of the New Hampshire Advantage.]

Our friend Jane Aitken of the Coalition of NH Taxpayers (CNHT) sends the following article in order to help Granite Grok readers further understand who’s really behind the "anti-pledge" warrant articles appearing on some 88 towns here in NH. As it is an underhanded attempt to chip away at our New Hampshire Advantage, we are doing everything we can to expose this group for who they are and what they are trying to do to our beloved Granite State… 

Once again it’s the time of year when NH residents will attend town meetings, school meetings, and deliberative sessions, to decide how  their tax dollars will be spent. They will make decisions about the education of their children.  Since we in NH cherish local control, I present to you some infiltrators to be wary of during these discussions.

There will likely be present operatives from a group by the name of "Granite State Fair Tax Coalition". They may be offering any number  of "resolutions" for approval in the form of citizens petitioned warrant articles.

These articles may contain resolutions calling for our candidates for  State Representative, State Senator, and Governor to reject the local  "Taxpayer Protection Pledge".

This is merely an attempt to demonize those taking the Pledge as well as an attack on the Pledge itself. Taking the Pledge simply means that fiscally responsible legislators promise to reject any broad-based new tax such as a sales or income tax. Along with the goal of getting candidates to reject the Pledge, the articles may even be amended to specifically state the consideration of an income or sales tax.

The reasoning behind this non-binding action seems purely psychological and intended to convince taxpayers that  somehow, a new broad-based tax will lower property taxes. However, freedom of speech dictates that one’s right to take the Pledge cannot be legislated away. Candidates can and will continue to take the Pledge if they expect to be elected.

 

Read more

Republicans ‘destroying’ Belknap County… (and themselves, in the process)

Fans of the various Superman incarnations might recall the minor character, Bizarro, failed clone of Superman. After being hit by a meteor, Bizarro’s “powers” were the reverse of Superman’s. Leaving Earth, the evil clone moved to a world known as “Htrae” with “Bizarro-Lois,” creating “Bizarro World.” According to the Wikipedia

In the Bizarro world, a cube-shaped planet known as ‘Htrae’ (Earth spelled backward), society is ruled by the Bizarro Code, which states that it is a crime to do anything well or to make anything perfect or beautiful. In one episode, for example, a salesman is doing a brisk trade selling ‘Bizarro bonds. Guaranteed to lose money for you.’

Simply put- it is a world where up is down and in is out and good is bad. Come with me as I pay a visit to “Bizarro World…”

Writing in a post at our local blog, GilfordGrok, I noted that here in the Granite State, it is the job of the County Convention– comprised of the county’s delegation of NH house representatives– to review and approve the county budget that is proposed to them by the members of the County Commission. The Convention has much the same power and function as a municipal budget committee, with one difference: Unlike a municipal budget committee’s decisions, which are subjected to one final layer of checks and balances– the voters, who get the last word, the Convention’s vote is the ultimate and final authority. As our elected representatives, the Convention members form a purely republican (small “r”) form of government, in that we completely rely on them to act on our behalf. They are the eyes and ears of the taxpayers of the county. Let me repeat what I wrote last week at GilfordGrok: “Based upon my recent observations, they have failed us miserably.” After what I witnessed this past Tuesday night, I stand pat by that observation.

It is no secret that fiscal matters at all levels of government are facing extra scrutiny lately. With a slowing economy, and rising costs of energy and other necessary items of life, taxpayers are getting pinched, and are looking for relief wherever possible. In Laconia, the citizens have enacted a tax cap, vowing to live within their means. The practical result is that the city is now choosing how it spends its resources carefully, in some cases going without—much like any average family. Dittoes for neighboring Gilford, where the Selectmen, the School Board, and the Budget Committee have all worked to lighten the load on the taxpayers. Not so for the County. Over there, it’s “taxpayers be damned, business as usual.”

Read more

[Note: This is the first of a 2 part posting on the call. The detail and amount of material, while seemingly mundane budgetary matters, has ramifications of great consequence for all of us. More people need to become aware of the alarm bells being sounded by Senator Gregg.]

This week I had the opportunity to participate in a Blogger’s conference call with NH’s senior Senator Judd Gregg, Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee. I have to say that when it comes to discussing the federal budget… WOW! Senator Gregg greatly impressed me with his knowledge of the process and the current and future spending proposals coming down the pike. Additionally, he was filled with fire and passion– something I’ve never really greatly associated with Sen. Gregg. Unfortunately, Judd’s efforts notwithstanding, unless we can derail what the majority Democrats have in mind, we will all pay the price for their government largesse with increased taxes. He started with his assessment of the Democrats’ budgetary practices, now with some history as proof:

"Last year was the first time the Democratic Congress produced a budget in 12 years. They had the benefit of the doubt. When they said they were going to control spending, people gave them the benefit of the doubt. When they said they were going to address the problems which we confront with entitlements because of the baby boom generation and the cost that is going to be put on our children, people gave them the benefit of the doubt. When they said they were going to use pay-go rules—this motherhood term—to discipline spending around here, people gave them the benefit of the doubt. When they said they weren’t going to raise the national debt any more than the President was, people gave them the benefit of the doubt. When they said they weren’t going to raise taxes on the American people, that they were going to find revenues by simply collecting taxes that were already owed, people gave them the benefit of the doubt."

As he then told us,

• "They didn’t control spending."
• "They didn’t keep taxes down."
• "They’ve created more entitlement concerns."
• "They violated "PAYGO"- their OWN rule!"

"Democrat Kent Conrad says the ‘debt is the threat.’"

"Obama-rama"

This, he said

"will add 300 billion dollars of new spending annually!"

Read more