While Scaremongering CO2 NOAA (Unintentionally) Admits No Correlation to Sea Level Rise ... or Fossil Fuels - Granite Grok

While Scaremongering CO2 NOAA (Unintentionally) Admits No Correlation to Sea Level Rise … or Fossil Fuels

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Climate Cult’s got some new problems to address. A reliable government advocate for the fossil-fuels-drive-the-apocalypse narrative just kicked their scientific consensus in the McNuggets – twice.

In a tweet earlier this month, NOAA had this to say (tweet and accompanying scary graph below).

The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around 4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today, the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, & large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra.

If the damage does not appear obvious, I am happy to explain. First, they admit there was as much CO2 in the atmosphere absent any whiff of modernity or your fossil-fuel-fired Western comfort. That’s the science, my friend. Second, for reasons the science cannot explain, equal concentrations of CO2 correlate with a 75-foot difference in sea level from today.

Let’s make it four problems: There is no correlation to sea ice either (we have loads of sea ice compared to the same CO2 concentrations then), and large forests existing on the land currently inhospitable to same.

We’ve covered all of this in past articles, so we’d like to thank NOAA for confirming our previous reporting with a hat tip to the proggy detractors who doubted that science.

I’m no atmospheric scientist (or geologist), nor do I rely on a rising tide of climate cult grants to sustain my way of life, but “The Science” suggests some other forcing is involved that has nothing to do with CO2.

I’m sure someone from the CO2-causes-sea-level-rise-funding camp will be along shortly to politely correct my pedestrian observation. After all, how could laymen such as myself be expected to interpret a tweet from NOAA properly? I’m not even supposed to be able to read. Just look at the picture, dopey, and then vote for more research funding into scaring people out of their natural rights even when the science makes no sense.

Note: If this came from anyone but NOAA, would it be disinformation?

>