In New Hampshire, it is illegal to treat gender dysphoria. By law, you cannot advise any patient to consider their birth sex, only whatever else the culture can imagine, and I think, someday soon, someone should sue the state. There is no evidence that transition is the best choice, and there is increasing proof it is not.
Therapists have no choice, so the only remedy would be to take the government to court as a means to use discovery to correct this miscarriage of science, therapy, and injustice. Sadly, it will likely take the parents of a child who, after being encouraged to transition because no other consideration is permitted, has committed suicide or suffered harm from hormone treatments or surgery.
The legislature lacks the will to fix it, while I see that GraniteGrok continues to report a cascade of revelations about the serisl fraud being committed in the name of gender science and social justice.
The most recent revelations come again out of England, where a study was commissioned into the research upon which gender “therapy” for children is based. The summation of this analysis says it all. The majority of it is of low quality, lacks developmental rigor and transparency, and the pillars of gender medicine are built on shaky foundations.
In the foreword to her report, [Dr. Hilary] Cass said while doctors tended to be cautious in implementing new findings, “quite the reverse happened in the field of gender care for children.”
It’s almost as if actual science was hijacked to advance some other agenda.
Cass commissioned the University of York to conduct a series of analyses as part of her review.
Two papers examined the quality and development of current guidelines and recommendations for managing gender dysphoria in children and young people. Most of the 23 clinical guidelines reviewed were not independent or evidence based, the researchers found.
A third paper on puberty blockers found that of 50 studies, only one was of high quality.
Similarly, of 53 studies included in a fourth paper on the use of hormone treatment, only one was of sufficiently high quality, with little or only inconsistent evidence on key outcomes.
Stories from or about genderbending from the UK, France, Netherlands, WPATH, and others point to the unraveling of a conspiracy based on what amounts to garbage. Whether those truth bombs keep falling or not depends on a lot of things, including what we do with the information seeping between the clutched fist of the transgender agenda. We’re not talking emergency use vaccine money, but the payday is substantial and without continued pushback from parents, school boards, towns, and legislatures, the children are not safe.
The gender warriors will not leave them alone while accusing anyone who contradicts their program as bigoted. That’s a lie. You have just as much right to speak your opinion as they do and based on this new analysis, most of what has been passing for gender science is little more than opinion with very littleevidence to back it up.
