When scientism coughs up “research” suggesting that your exhaled breath is not a negligible contribution to man-caused climate change, your first thought should be, where can I buy a firearm?
After the rise in government-encouraged assisted suicide, public policy that drove people to actual suicide, an engineered virus spread across the globe, followed by a “cure” that was more dangerous than the virus (and the orchestrated fear campaign that got it into billions or arms) – firearms is what you need.
Especially if you were not, until now, certain that they were coming for you.
The new study was led by Dr Nicholas Cowan, an atmospheric physicist at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Edinburgh.
‘Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming,’ Dr Cowan and colleagues say.
‘We would urge caution in the assumption that emissions from humans are negligible.’
I’d expect this new narrative to have legs as other “scientism” experts ape it, duplicate it, and then form a confirmation bias circle-jerk to justify the validity of their findings. It fits too nicely into the ongoing overpopulation narrative echoed across the party of death depopulation agenda.
Yes, you are the carbon they want to reduce. And it’s not just CO2!
Plants essentially soak up all the CO2 that’s emitted in human breath, so ‘CO2 contribution in human breath to climate change is essentially zero,’ Dr Cowan told MailOnline.
The same cannot be said for methane and nitrous oxide, as plants don’t use these gases in photosynthesis.
METHANE!
We shared numerous links and things about CO2 being an insignificant bit of the Earth’s atmosphere, which it is. But what about methane, fart breath? It’s new boogeyman of the Climate Cult.
Some thoughts from WUWT.
The role of anthropogenic methane (CH4) in global warming is exaggerated. The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), as measured at Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO), is above 420 ±0.7 ppmv (parts per million-volume) and is increasing about 2.8 ppmv annually. CH4 has a concentration of about 1.9 ppmv and is increasing about 0.014 ppmv annually. The anthropogenic contribution to the annual CH4 increase is a fraction of the total, probably about one-third, albeit the official estimate was increased in recent years. CH4 has more potential for warming than CO2, but it is effectively gone in about a decade, having a commonly cited long-term impact that is only about 32X that of an equal weight of CO2. Accounting for the CO2 warming equivalence on a mole-fraction basis reduces the equivalence factor to less than 12X. It is the long-term impact we need to be concerned about because of an arbitrary temperature threshold claimed to be threatening our survival after 2050. With CO2 being more than 200X as abundant, even with the greater potential impact of CH4, the Global Methane Pledge will, at most, achieve a 0.58% annual decrease in CO2-equivalent CH4.
A lot of nothing, which is what we’ve found from the climate cult time and again.
You can read more on the methane research here.
