One of the many pages of documents pried from the FDA and Pfizer by court order explains a process that includes Graphene Oxide. Some have jumped on this as proof it is in the vaccines themselves. Is it? Let’s take a look.
Graphene Oxide appears once in the 14-page document, which you can review here. Expose’ news has more here. And that leads us to the Graphene Oxide in the COVID Vaccines conspiracy theory. Or perhaps I should say the narrative that its presence is a conspiracy theory.
I’ve read the Expose report but am not convinced of their conclusion. They say it is proof that it’s in the vaccine, but I could not tell if the citation regards manufacturing or a testing process, but my initial gut sense was the latter.
To help that debate along, I found a DEC 2020 research paper published by the NIH, titled “Potential of graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19: properties, perspectives, and Prospects,” which appears to prepare the battle space for how graphene “may contribute to fighting against COVID-19.”
Graphene and graphene-related materials (GRMs) exhibit extraordinary physicochemical, electrical, optical, antiviral, antimicrobial, and other fascinating properties that warrant them as potential candidates for designing and development of high-performance components and devices required for COVID-19 pandemic and other futuristic calamities. In this article, we discuss the potential of graphene and GRMs for healthcare applications and how they may contribute to fighting against COVID-19.
The paper is not, in fact, about sneaking Graphene into vaccines but how it could prevent the spread of SARS CoV2 or other viruses on contact surfaces or used in materials that make up PPE.
In the present pandemic situation, where the COVID-19 cases are exponentially increasing each day globally, the development of efficient anti-SARS-CoV-2 protective surfaces/coatings can play a significant role in controlling the viral spread through high touch components, products, and systems.
Graphene is also considered a potential component in virus detection devices, but nowhere does it indicate its use in vaccines.
Additionally, Fact Checkers – who can’t typically be trusted, appear to confirm that this “document in question describes a validation process in the lab that uses graphene oxide, but that process is not part of the manufacturing process.” …
The document describes a validation process in a lab, according to Dr. Thomas Russo, chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at the University at Buffalo’s Department of Medicine.
“That shows an evaluative process, not how it is made,” he said of the document.
Call it confirmation bias, but that – as noted above – was my initial gut feeling. So where does that leave me on the question?
A million things are wrong with the political and public health response to COVID-19 and as many or more as regards the “vaccine.” We’ve documented most of them and will continue to try and report on each again – especially when the media or the Public Health Industrial Complex is forced to admit defeat. That what they labeled a conspiracy theory has turned out to be true. The Expose piece, however, is not adding truth, as far as I can tell, given the context of the document cited.
If doctors, researchers, or scientists from around the globe have reported traces of Graphene in vaccines or blood samples, those need to be addressed individually with an unbiased eye. The Machine has, after all, been known to use the internet to catalyze false ideas to make people who have made otherwise cogent observations about the failure of the response to COVID (as one example) look like cranks whose corpus is then labeled as disingenuous by association.
I’m not here to deny any claim that might be legitimate but to point out that the Pfizer Doc in question is not proof that they put it in the juice, and you should avoid suggesting otherwise. But I will add that the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) produces zero results for a search of Graphene. And a search of Daily Clout.io (Naomi Wolf’s website) for graphene oxide also has zero results.
Both sights have done a rigorous review of the many documents pried from Pfizer and the FDA, and its absence in my mind is telling.
