Blogline of the Day – Elizabeth Warren Continues to Be the Word-Punching Bag She Has Worked to Be

by
Skip

Although I admit, Steve’s post about biology trumping silly sexuality identity propaganda came close (yes, I’ve had that tabbed to put up – GREAT fun!): Men vs. Women: The Boys From Wrexham Wrecked ‘Em! – I think this edges it out, even if in a tweet:

“Gender-affirming care” is to health as “Elizabeth Warren” is to Indian.

 

https://twitter.com/xenophonrocks/status/1666470495271755776

Yep, that 1/2024th of an Indian was just GREAT in taking an old, rich, white Progressive to the heights of Harvard Law (otherwise known as “affirmative action hire” and onward to a self-righteous Senatorial campaign that allows her to thrust her ideology (“You didn’t build that” meaning you’re just stupid to do anything without Government) onto the rest of us. Translation – nothing to do with Warren at all. TMEW is orders of magnitude more Indian than Warren.

Euphemism – the Left would blink out of existence faster than a proton meeting up with an anti-proton if they didn’t have euphemisms to call and change a horribleness like voluntary human mutilation by Parents of their children by slicing off perfectly good body parts for the sake of being part of the “cool kids” they missed out on being part of in Jr. High School (yes, I am of that age and so is Warren. Older, she is, truth be told).

That’s all that “gender-affirmative” means in this case – and now the studies are starting to show that it is all for naught – WORSE outcomes, mentally, than before being drugged and knifed into some simulacrum of attempting to be the other sex that you can never be.

Even the concept of doing so completely wrecks the illusion that gender is a spectrum item – if you’re a guy, you’re trying to get fixed (like a dog being neutered) to be a girl.  Isn’t that demonstrating that sex is binary – you know, real life and real biology without the idiocy of attempting to redefine what “gender” means simply to fulfill a political agenda???

One last point before I leave. Before “transgender” became a thing, there used to be another word that described a guy wearing girls’ clothes (and visa-versa):

Transvestite

Glad to see that word is coming back into use as it more correct in describing what is now happening. No child-body mutilation can result in a boy/girl becoming a girl/boy.  Clothes do NOT make the man. Or girl.

 

(H/T; Instapundit)

 

Author

  • Skip

    Co-founder of GraniteGrok, my concern is around Individual Liberty and Freedom and how the Government is taking that away. As an evangelical Christian and Conservative with small "L" libertarian leanings, my fight is with Progressives forcing a collectivized, secular humanistic future upon us. As a TEA Party activist, citizen journalist, and pundit!, my goal is to use the New Media to advance the radical notions of America's Founders back into our culture.

Share to...