Vermont Dems Propose Bill to Hide Child-Rape and Sex Trafficking from Parents

by
Steve MacDonald

Vermont Democrats have created a state where it appears necessary to ensure that 12-year-olds can get treated for sexually transmitted diseases without telling their parents. Isn’t a better question or concern, where in Vermont are 12-year-olds getting STDs?

First, from True North Reports.

 

S.151ย would โ€œallow a minor 12 years of age or older to consent to medical care for the prevention of a sexually transmitted infection,โ€ which would further remove parents from direct involvement in the health and wellbeing of their children.

The bill would require informing parents only if hospitalization is needed: โ€œThe physician shall notify the parent, parents, or legal guardian of the minor if the condition of the minor child requires immediate hospitalization for treatment of the sexually transmitted infection.โ€

Clear as Vodka, comrade, so back to my question.

To get a sexually transmitted disease, you need to have sex with someone who has an STD. This suggests that either your partner has one or they have had sex with someone who does. I find it unlikely that twelve-year-olds, despite the Left’s efforts, are having enough sex with enough partners in their age groups (of suspicious enough circumstance) to get an STD. I could be wrong. The Green Mountain State might be the nexus of Tween-year-old sex trafficking rings and rampant disregard for sexual health despite the blathering of Democrats about how important it is.

The alternative is that children 12 years or younger are having sex with “adults” (maybe lots of them) who have casual sex in excess such that they’ve contracted and then passed on a sexually transmitted disease that manifests at 12 years or older.

Vermont is very progressive, but sex with minors is still illegal. It is rape. Not just rape, but rape rape. Any women’s healthcare advocate or regular contributor on The View worth her forceps or Abortifacients will tell you as much.

So, S.151 isn’t about making accommodations for the immediate healthcare needs of children. It is meant to hide child rape and sex trafficking from parents and guardians. And not for nothing, but these are the same people (Democrats) who insist that the government schools have more rights over children than their parents.

 

 

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...